Sadly, that's not remotely the case.John Marcone said:Once again. You can not call that a feminist issue. Rapists are gonna think what they want. The only time feminism should be brought into it is if it is used in court and no civilised court is gonna take that sort of claim even semi seriously. Hell, most of them will go harder on the rapist since it shows a lack of remorse.While what the victim was wearing is an excuse for rapists, we still need feminism.
Scotland has begun circulating a PSA about how a woman's dress is not an invitation to rape after a survey suggested "almost one in five Scots believe a woman is partially to blame for being raped if she is wearing revealing clothing".
[link]http://www.rapecrisisscotland.org.uk/news/not-ever-scotland-s-first-ever-tv-rape-advert-launched-this-week/[/link]
A man in Manitoba was sentenced to a term without jail time for his rape conviction by the judge because said judge felt there was a "perceived invitation" in the victim wearing a tube top.
[link]http://goodmenproject.com/newsroom/judge-pardons-rapist-because-victim-was-wearing-a-tube-top/[/link]
Florida decided to pass a bill preventing attorneys from bringing up rape victims' clothing in court after a man was acquitted in 1990 because the jury felt the victim's manner of dress was "asking for it".
[link]http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1990-05-30/news/9001100984_1_lace-miniskirt-victim-jury-foreman[/link]
What judges and juries think is an acceptable reason to let a rapist off damn well is a feminist issue.