Labyrinth said:
We 'whine' about those as well, actually. See, if Duke Nukem was the only game in which this is the case it wouldn't be an issue, it'd be a lone incident. The issue is that the industry overall consistently and persistently throws up games in which this behaviour is encouraged.
Oh, go ahead. Name 3 excluding Duke. I will wait.
Besides, lets say there were actually a fair number of games out there with this sort of material, why should people not have the option to play these games? You would have the industry remove peoples options. How about we start limiting female oriented games huh. See, the very notion is offensive. Should we limit the number of violent video games too because it upsets pacifists?
Fact is, if you do not like it, do not play it.
Oh really now? I'm a real feminist too
No you're not.
and I assure you, it's still very relevant. While Yale fraternities are preaching that "no means yes, yes means anal" we still need feminism.
No. We do not. Because that has nothing to do with feminism. That is about rape. Rapists do not care about equality of women. The feminist part of that is convincing the legal system that that is rape. Which has already been done.
While non-cis, non-heterosexual students are still persectued for not adhering to gender norms to the point where they are 6 or more times more likely to commit suicide, we still need feminism.
Not a feminist issue. That is feminists trying to take on other, non feminism related causes just to feel relevant seeing as how they are outdated. Would be like PETA taking on race issues...
While what the victim was wearing is an excuse for rapists, we still need feminism.
Once again. You can not call that a feminist issue. Rapists are gonna think what they want. The only time feminism should be brought into it is if it is used in court and no civilised court is gonna take that sort of claim even semi seriously. Hell, most of them will go harder on the rapist since it shows a lack of remorse.
While men are still refused monetary support and encouragement to become primary carers we still need feminism.
... You do realise feminism is about women right? Stop trying to claim other issues are feminist issues.
And these are contemporary western issues. Not even starting on the global ones that feminism is always relevant to such as the battle against arranged marriage, infant genital mutilation, sexual slavery and the systematic use of rape as a weapon of terror in war.
And if you are over in those countries then you will be relevant. In the west you are not a true feminist anymore.
Let's see now. How many myths about the feminine have we here? The automatic assumption that women desire marriage is the most prominent one. Not to mention the idea that all it takes is a potentially false proposition to turn a woman into a whore.
Dudes not necessary offering her marriage. He is just offering her a bit of shine in return for sex. Plus I have noticed one thing about that picture. Every woman takes it as the man giving the woman something. None of them even think about the fact that she is giving him something in return for the shiney. And yes, maybe more people are not wanting marriage. But there are still a whole metric fuck-tonne that do.
How about the near-limitless quantity of feminist argument against marriage as an instution as it originates from principles of controlling female sexuality and the definition of women as property of their fathers, then their husbands? I call horseshit on that picture.
Yeah and tinned food was invented to feed the army. Does that mean anti-war protestors should be opposed to something based on what it may originally have been designed for?
Black people were enslaved to pick cotton, yet I bet youll not find any black person who refuses to wear cotton because of some stupid bit of history that has nothing to do with today.
I can not control what pissy people choose to take offence to because at some point it history it meant something else.
Do remember that not all women are feminists. I have never met a female feminist who would do what that picture suggests, and I've met a lot of women who don't claim to be feminists who would call horseshit on it as well.
Already said that not all women are feminists. Modern feminists just can not accept that they are too late, that they are not needed anymore. And femnazis are just idiots who happen to be women. Plus of course no woman is gonna
admit she will fuck for a ring. But slap a ring in front of them and see how many do...
White, heterosexual males perhaps. They're not exactly a majority of the population, they're just the ones with the privilege to believe that if it's for them, it's for everyone and if everyone doesn't enjoy it then there's something wrong with them or they're bitching unnecessarily. This is the very essence of endemic privilege, that the second something includes or targets a group other than that, it's deemed less valuable or a betrayal. Look at the bullshit that got thrown around when Bioware put non-mandatory homosexual relationships into Dragon Age, including relationships which were only directed at females. Even heterosexual females. How many games do we see in which the usual protagonist is not white and male and below 50 and heterosexual, and this is not considered revoltionary, devious, betrayal of the 'target audience' or innovative?
Once again. You are trying to take the opinions of a absolutely tiny number of people and turn it into a issue. The number of people that complained about the homosexual option was tiny. Most of those who did complain about the homosexual thing with Anders in DA2 was more to do with the way it was handled [http://v.cdn.cad-comic.com/comics/cad-20110314-c6e0a.png]. Which actually kinda made the DA2 lead writer look like an ass since he was trying to take the moral high ground and totally glossing over the fact that the way they implemented it was shitty and forced.
There's no evidence to suggest that women, for example, wouldn't be a core demographic for games which target them. Who are you to say that is not a valuable thing to aim for?
Fine. Then allow them to have games that target them.
Stop trying to take away games that target others just because they do not target you.
Sims does not target me, I do not ***** about it because I am not its core audience. Day time soaps do not target me, once again, I do not ***** about them.
I do not try to change them or demand they be removed.
I let you have your options that appeal to you. You leave games that appeal to me alone.
End of story is this. Feminists are done. They are no longer needed in the western world. The "feminists" of today are trying to emulate the role models of the last couple generations so they are trying to take on others issues to try to still feel like they are important.
You want to take on gender issues as a whole? Stop labelling yourself a feminist. Think up a new title because one thing you are not is a feminist. Going after non issues under the title feminist just sullies the memory of the women who fought to be considered more than property.