Yeah, soldiers totally regenerate health in 3 seconds.henno13 said:DutchAssassin8 said:COD MW 2I lol'd. There must be something wrong with the people you meet if they think MW2 is realisitc.realistic
Yeah, soldiers totally regenerate health in 3 seconds.henno13 said:DutchAssassin8 said:COD MW 2I lol'd. There must be something wrong with the people you meet if they think MW2 is realisitc.realistic
Exactly. No matter how realistic the flight sim or FPS is, the fact that you will never be in that situation in your life means they are still very much an escape from your real life.Bynine said:Because realistic games usually mean shooting. And that person killing millions and not getting caught is not realistic.
...DutchAssassin8 said:Before COD MW 2 was made, everybody i met agreed. Now they say Halo sucks because it isn't realistic.?
The port was bad, many of your problems seem to be that not the actual mechanics, I have instant repsonses on my pc copy, but run and gun was easy most of the time in GTA IV.ImprovizoR said:Always. But I played it with a controller and it was still fucked up.Mcface said:Did you play GTA on PC by chance?ImprovizoR said:I don't like the realism wagon Rockstar jumped on. GTA4 and both DLC's were as fun as diarrhea. Cover system in GTA4 sucks and so does the character movement. It takes Niko 3 seconds to respond to your commands. It's a pain in the ass to play that game. And cover system is just stupid. The entire shooting mechanics is about you crouching behind cover not moving once until the end of the gunfight. That's how easy the game is because of their realism thingy. What happened to run and gun in most video games? Run and gun is awesome. Cover system should be used only when you're wounded. That may not be realistic but it's fun. Realism is boring. If I wanted realism I'd go outside and rob a real bank. At least I'd have fun doing it.
Escapism is not confined to a specific genre (f.x. fantasy or sci-fi) but covers every type of reality.DutchAssassin8 said:i'm not a hardcore gamer but i always liked the HAlO series for some reason. and before COD MW 2 was made, everybody i met agreed. Now they say Halo sucks because it isn't realistic. so what? most people watch movies, read books and play games to escape this reality and enter an other one. like the wise says: we decline your reality and substitute our own. i would love to hear your opinion about this and only this. Not things like im an idiot because i like Halo, i get that enough.
in short:Is realism in games better than games without any relation to reality?
Thats why man. The PC port of all of those games are garbage.ImprovizoR said:Always. But I played it with a controller and it was still fucked up.Mcface said:Did you play GTA on PC by chance?ImprovizoR said:I don't like the realism wagon Rockstar jumped on. GTA4 and both DLC's were as fun as diarrhea. Cover system in GTA4 sucks and so does the character movement. It takes Niko 3 seconds to respond to your commands. It's a pain in the ass to play that game. And cover system is just stupid. The entire shooting mechanics is about you crouching behind cover not moving once until the end of the gunfight. That's how easy the game is because of their realism thingy. What happened to run and gun in most video games? Run and gun is awesome. Cover system should be used only when you're wounded. That may not be realistic but it's fun. Realism is boring. If I wanted realism I'd go outside and rob a real bank. At least I'd have fun doing it.