Because people are disillusioned morons.
Don't get me wrong, I love Star Wars, but the originals are hardly masterpieces. Special effects-wise (for the time) they were maybe, but so were the prequels. Once uses miniatures and the other uses a blue screen a lot (although there's more real set there then people give them credit for I think).
They're fun space opera romps (not that kind of romp!), with a bit of food for thought. And that sentence applies to both trilogies.
People are just too stuck up when it comes to the midi-chlorians that were already established in 1977, the year A New Hope was released. Or Jar Jar Binks - an attempt at comic-relief that miscalculated but hardly film-destroying.
Don't even get me started on how a man with the potential to become the most powerful person in the galaxy, who then loses his mother and has the vision of the same thing happening to his wife is not a candidate to join the dark side. Especially when he's told he can save her.
Yeah, you're right people; God-forbid Lucas comes up with human reasons for a person to do the wrong thing.
Oh, and Lucas was just as bad at writing romance in the originals as he was in the prequels.
HijiriOni said:
OH Speaking of Palpatine, 1-3 actually retconned him, just a tad. He's not a true sith or even truly capable of using the force. His lightning bolts come from mechanisms that drain his life to generate them, which is why he rapidly ages after using them. But they basically made him seem like he was a sith accept showing the rapid aging, but they don't explain it.
That's not true. At all.