they won't have it because they'd be pretty much shooting themselves in the foot. some games are impossible to find new anymore so used is the only way newer gamers will have of even getting them at all. even this gen has some games that are impossible to find new anymoreFelixG said:I buy my games new.
Though I can just look at this thread and chuckle when it is plainly obvious why next gen systems will likely include anti used game components.
I'll never understand why people think this is true of anything but new releases and first party Nintendo games (which just don't drop in price until about a year before the death of the system they're on.) I picked up a used copy of Ragdoll Kung Fu for $2 yesterday[footnote]The standard price is $10, it's a budget title for the PC[/footnote], proving that not only is the markdown usually pretty significant if it's not brand freakin' new, but also that PC games can still be bought used if you know where to look. Not that I would recommend it with this one; I got extremely lucky because the previous owner hadn't registered it with steam, opting for the stripped down multiplayer options you get without having to download Valve's software. Still, I buy used PC games all the time, and that's the first one I've bought that had a one time use code on it. Everything else I've bought in recent memory has either a disc check only, or a CD key that can be used on as many computers and by as many accounts as the owner wants.kaizen2468 said:I don't. Not so poor that I will buy a used game for 54.99 instead of 59.99, especially when they probably paid the person less than half that.
Also, handhelds (at least Nintendo ones) tend to retain value (first party or not).Owyn_Merrilin said:I'll never understand why people think this is true of anything but new releases and first party Nintendo games (which just don't drop in price until about a year before the death of the system they're on.)
I recommend to you this beauty. Buy all my games from it.Zhukov said:Cheaper. It's that simple.
I can buy a brand new high-profile PS3 game for $110. (Australia. Shut up.)
Or I can wait a few months and buy it for $70. (Seriously, stop laughing.)
Or I can wait a few months, trade in some old games and get it for $30.
I make no apologies for saving money. Fuck the developers and publishers. If they want my day-one new game money they can either lower prices or make games that are really worth those ridiculous prices.
I live in Australia.Owyn_Merrilin said:I'll never understand why people think this is true of anything but new releases and first party Nintendo games (which just don't drop in price until about a year before the death of the system they're on.) I picked up a used copy of Ragdoll Kung Fu for $2 yesterday[footnote]The standard price is $10, it's a budget title for the PC[/footnote], proving that not only is the markdown usually pretty significant if it's not brand freakin' new, but also that PC games can still be bought used if you know where to look. Not that I would recommend it with this one; I got extremely lucky because the previous owner hadn't registered it with steam, opting for the stripped down multiplayer options you get without having to download Valve's software. Still, I buy used PC games all the time, and that's the first one I've bought that had a one time use code on it. Everything else I've bought in recent memory has either a disc check only, or a CD key that can be used on as many computers and by as many accounts as the owner wants.kaizen2468 said:I don't. Not so poor that I will buy a used game for 54.99 instead of 59.99, especially when they probably paid the person less than half that.
Oh, I also pick up used console games on the cheap, it's just that the most recent console I own and still actually play is my DS Lite, which I do occasionally pick up used games for for quite a bit less than the new price. I've never been into a Gamestop that didn't have used Xbox 360, Wii, and PS3 games for under $20, though. They may not have been released the day before, but they were significantly cheaper than $5 off a new copy.
I could maybe see that with Australian prices, but it's almost always stated to be $55 vs. $60, not $115 vs. $120 or $90 VS. $85, which means we're talking US, not Australia.Supertegwyn said:I live in Australia.Owyn_Merrilin said:I'll never understand why people think this is true of anything but new releases and first party Nintendo games (which just don't drop in price until about a year before the death of the system they're on.) I picked up a used copy of Ragdoll Kung Fu for $2 yesterday[footnote]The standard price is $10, it's a budget title for the PC[/footnote], proving that not only is the markdown usually pretty significant if it's not brand freakin' new, but also that PC games can still be bought used if you know where to look. Not that I would recommend it with this one; I got extremely lucky because the previous owner hadn't registered it with steam, opting for the stripped down multiplayer options you get without having to download Valve's software. Still, I buy used PC games all the time, and that's the first one I've bought that had a one time use code on it. Everything else I've bought in recent memory has either a disc check only, or a CD key that can be used on as many computers and by as many accounts as the owner wants.kaizen2468 said:I don't. Not so poor that I will buy a used game for 54.99 instead of 59.99, especially when they probably paid the person less than half that.
Oh, I also pick up used console games on the cheap, it's just that the most recent console I own and still actually play is my DS Lite, which I do occasionally pick up used games for for quite a bit less than the new price. I've never been into a Gamestop that didn't have used Xbox 360, Wii, and PS3 games for under $20, though. They may not have been released the day before, but they were significantly cheaper than $5 off a new copy.
It's true, a lot of our pre-owned games are cents off our new ones.
It just isn't worth it.
Bargain... bucket?Muspelheim said:And I agree, it's simply because it's cheaper. Used games and the bargain-bucket is where I make most of my finds.
I have only one disclaimer I feel should be added to this - when the price is literally merely shaved rather than cut, like it's $5 off or something ridiculously small. In that situation, I feel it's wrong to leap at the "saving" rather than supporting the publisher and developer. It's really on stores to make sure it doesn't happen - and GameStop often puts used and new on the same shelf, right next to each other, because they know people who don't know better will take the minimal saving and thus they'll pocket all the cash for themselves - but when you have the knowledge, it seems trivial to leap at a relatively low discount at the cost of shafting the people who actually made the game.Lunncal said:Because they're cheaper... why else? When you've got two ways to purchase exactly the same thing (and this statement only applies when they are exactly the same), and one is cheaper than the other, you'd pretty much have to be an idiot to do it the more expensive way. I'm both amazed and appalled at the success companies have had convincing us that buying used is somehow evil.