That is not what I meant. I apologise if i conveyed the wrong idea.heavymedicombo said:so apparently people dont pick up games from companies theyve never heard of and only stay with what is familiar. if this was true there would be no games market. only nintendo.Korovashya said:My theory, there were two types of people who played Fallout 3.
1. The Elder Scrolls fans who were just happy to have a new Bethesda Games.
2. The venerable veterans of the original Fallout's who just wanted a new fallout game for the suddenly resurrected franchise.
The problem with this is the in-built human resistance to anything new. The oblivion fans were angry because they interpreted it as an elder scrolls RPG with guns added to the mix, and the fallout veterans interpreted it as the defilement of a classic franchise by changing it.
The second reason is that the games are similar enough to be compared as part of the same series, (Not my opinion but I'm stating fact here) and it is a natural reaction to regard the 1st of anything superior.
Of course, there are also the smart gamers who judged it on its own merits. Personally I fall into both categories mentioned above, as I have played Bethesda since Morrowind, and I remember playing Fallout 2 as a kid.
And guess what? I Thought Fallout 3 was the best of both worlds.
Of course there are people who like to try new things, I didn't say there aren't. However, most players of Fallout 3 fall into those categories, and they make up most of the people who compare the games.