Why does everybody hate 3D?

Recommended Videos

captaincabbage

New member
Apr 8, 2010
3,149
0
0
capin Rob said:
F*** 3D...
I'll just wait until hologran hits mainstream, It'll be worth it
speaking of which. . .


Wow. that was wierd. I'm listening to Stylo by Gorillaz atm and I started up the video and it synched up awesomely in parts.
 

Turbulenssi

New member
Apr 6, 2010
271
0
0
I don't hate it but in my opinion it's not an improvement and it makes my eyes feel funny and my head dizzy, so I rather skip this trend and let rich people and hipsters throw their money in to this bottomless pit.
 

Bohemian Waltz

Senior Member
Oct 3, 2010
175
0
21
I'll divert to David Mitchells take on 3D as he puts it far more eloquently then I ever could. Enjoy the eye-strain.

 

Nigh Invulnerable

New member
Jan 5, 2009
2,500
0
0
3D is interesting, in theory, but never works the way I would hope in practice. There's still no adjuustment in perspective if I move around the image. Once that can be achieved easily, I'll be excited. There's a video of a guy doing this with a Wii, but I'm on my phone and can't find it.
 

MasterKirov

New member
Nov 8, 2009
148
0
0
Why do I hate 3D?

From my experiance, 3D makes me unwell. Generally something I can get around by not eating popcorn in the cinema, but that doesn't stop some things in 3D getting very disorienting at times.
 

elcamino41383

New member
Mar 24, 2009
602
0
0
captaincabbage said:
elcamino41383 said:
captaincabbage said:
elcamino41383 said:
captaincabbage said:
Meh, I don't hate it, I just think it's unnecessary.
I agree with how most people are saying it's not so good and etc, but this is exactly what I was going to say. For me it really just doesn't add anything extra.
The only thing it adds to my viewing experience is a headache.
I often worry about getting the headaches considering I already wear glasses. Has yet to happen but I suspect it will.

yeah, I get mild ones when I watch it and my girlfriend can't stand it since it strains her eyes (she wears glasses) AND gives her a headache.
It made the entire viewing of Resident Evil: Afterlife really bad, since Hoyts refused to show it in regular-o-vision. We're both fans of the RE movies, since they're always so unintentionally hilarious, though I feel the joke was on us this time.
Well it didn't help that Afterlife was probably the worse of the series. All that slow-mo was pretty stupid. I've liked the RE movies until I saw that one. It was a bit too ridiculous. The joke was on all of us that viewed that movie. Sad Pandas all around!
 

Mr.Incognitus

New member
Dec 7, 2010
127
0
0
I find it unnecessary for pretty much any movie released now, Avatar was the only movie I've seen that actually benefited from 3D, the rest of them it just seemed like a needlessly tacked on addition which swindled me out of 5 bucks. Since I wear glasses the 3D glasses were incredibly awkward to wear, but I didn't get a headache from them
 

captaincabbage

New member
Apr 8, 2010
3,149
0
0
elcamino41383 said:
captaincabbage said:
elcamino41383 said:
captaincabbage said:
elcamino41383 said:
captaincabbage said:
Meh, I don't hate it, I just think it's unnecessary.
I agree with how most people are saying it's not so good and etc, but this is exactly what I was going to say. For me it really just doesn't add anything extra.
The only thing it adds to my viewing experience is a headache.
I often worry about getting the headaches considering I already wear glasses. Has yet to happen but I suspect it will.

yeah, I get mild ones when I watch it and my girlfriend can't stand it since it strains her eyes (she wears glasses) AND gives her a headache.
It made the entire viewing of Resident Evil: Afterlife really bad, since Hoyts refused to show it in regular-o-vision. We're both fans of the RE movies, since they're always so unintentionally hilarious, though I feel the joke was on us this time.
Well it didn't help that Afterlife was probably the worse of the series. All that slow-mo was pretty stupid. I've liked the RE movies until I saw that one. It was a bit too ridiculous. The joke was on all of us that viewed that movie. Sad Pandas all around!
lol we're not here to discuss movies, we're here to discuss how stupid 3D is.
I rather enjoyed Afterlife, the 3D was just completely unneeded and made the movie just that little bit more rediculous than it needed to be.
 

Super Toast

Supreme Overlord of the Basement
Dec 10, 2009
2,476
0
0
Because it's expensive, gives people headaches and 1/10 of people can't see it.
 

elcamino41383

New member
Mar 24, 2009
602
0
0
captaincabbage said:
elcamino41383 said:
captaincabbage said:
elcamino41383 said:
captaincabbage said:
elcamino41383 said:
captaincabbage said:
Meh, I don't hate it, I just think it's unnecessary.
I agree with how most people are saying it's not so good and etc, but this is exactly what I was going to say. For me it really just doesn't add anything extra.
The only thing it adds to my viewing experience is a headache.
I often worry about getting the headaches considering I already wear glasses. Has yet to happen but I suspect it will.

yeah, I get mild ones when I watch it and my girlfriend can't stand it since it strains her eyes (she wears glasses) AND gives her a headache.
It made the entire viewing of Resident Evil: Afterlife really bad, since Hoyts refused to show it in regular-o-vision. We're both fans of the RE movies, since they're always so unintentionally hilarious, though I feel the joke was on us this time.
Well it didn't help that Afterlife was probably the worse of the series. All that slow-mo was pretty stupid. I've liked the RE movies until I saw that one. It was a bit too ridiculous. The joke was on all of us that viewed that movie. Sad Pandas all around!
lol we're not here to discuss movies, we're here to discuss how stupid 3D is.
I rather enjoyed Afterlife, the 3D was just completely unneeded and made the movie just that little bit more rediculous than it needed to be.
Sure we're here to discuss movies, movies with 3D and Afterlife did :p But I digress, overall I liked Afterlife too, just much less than the others. And yes, it was completely unnecessary and made it more ridiculous.
 

faceless chick

New member
Sep 19, 2009
560
0
0
3d is a fad, and i think it's been said before.
unlike sound or color, it came and went and was hardly missed.

most movies do it to rake a few more bucks from the easily impressed then gloat about it ("zomg this movie made twice as much as the previous one, even though the tickets cost twice as much, therefore it sold exactly as much as the other one , but we'll ignore that since it's the money that counts!!") and add NOTHING to the movie.

worse is when the movie script/scene is crippled to make room for 3d enhanced scenes -raise your hand if a 3d movie has a flying/jumping at you scene that wasn't necessary but looks "cool"- or you have shoddy 3d added in post (like airbender) because "hey, if avatar can make 2 billion, so can we"

also, like every fad, it gets tiring once it's overdone. remember the ninja turtles clones of the 80s/90s? weren't you sick of those by the 4th series that blatantly ripped it off for the sake of money? how about the pokemon clones?

this is how i feel about 3d. sure, a couple of 3d movies are a nice, refreshing idea, but it's become stale by now and i want this fad to end already.
 

Imp Poster

New member
Sep 16, 2010
618
0
0
I know the movie industry thinks its innovation because of how 3D technology has improved. Glasses were made out of paper and everything looked red and blue. But I feel that as a moviegoer, I have been trained to think that 3D has a purpose like flashbacks, flashfowards, start the movie from the ending, etc. So now when movies are going to be made for innovation, as the next thing to do, I do get turned off by 3D. It serves no purpose in the movie. So far, the movies that I remember that it was worth it to watch it in 3D was Beowulf and How to Train Your Dragon. I am sure Avatar would have been great too but I didn't watch it.