wewontdie11 said:
I understand what your point was but you seem to have completely missed mine. When talking about his speeches I'm not referring to his tone of voice or pattern of speech as you so incorrectly tried to "satirise" with your Stephen Hawking analogy. I was making reference to the content of his speeches and the remarks he makes not making sense, as if he just opens his mouth and lets the words fall out any which way they please. Such as:
........
If the man can't construct a coherent sentence then I wouldn't want him in the White House.
...Because of course that is the defining characteristic of a good leader, someone who can construct a sentence. You should really be evaluating his decisions with regard to his job and the rest of the world if you want to talk about his faults. Personal attacks about the way he talks or
forms a sentence fails to form a coherent sentence just shows that you dislike him rather than his actions.
TheIceface said:
Do you see what I did there? I made you look like a dick through satire. Now disagreeing with things people do is fine, but judging someones mental capability simply by the way they talk is a bit shallow and conceited. .....but I'd like to think I'm mature enough to be above making fun of the way someone talks in reference to how well they make decisions.)
Nope nothing there that appears as a personal attack to me...
Well I guess we've established how much of a sense of humor you have, but you
are shallow and conceited if you are judging peoples' ability to make decisions on the way they talk. Yes, I am using negative adjectives to specifically define
you. I wouldn't call it a personal attack as much as a personal evaluation. I'm evaluating your personal preference in regard to how you judge people. Rather than complaining that I'm a "meany-name-caller", why don't you refute my claims by posting something that shows evidence to the contrary.