The Iron Ninja post=18.72208.754527 said:
Bulletinmybrain post=18.72208.754522 said:
Gunz N' Roses were from the 80's/90's.
I'm torn about the Gunners, on the one hand they have Slash, who is a fairly decent guitarist. But on the other hand they have Axl Rose. And he has his very own tier of douchebaggery.
So all in all it evens out to Guns and Roses being a
patheticly average band.
Never a truer word said. Axl Rose; model beater, trash, asshole.
Like a few have said, 'rock' music, as you call it has been over-exposed from some time now, I remember the days when Linkin Park, Limp Bizkit and Korn were first all whored to the high heavens and soon began to churn out single after single. Not that this was the first time anything of this nature has happened.
Whether you're into the softer 'emo' stuff or into the heavier stuff with Bree singing they're both simple extremes of the same genre (metal), once they'd made everyone sick of rap-rock (**blames RATM too**) and Brandon Boyd strumming then stripping on stage, they decided to go one step further, in 2 separate directions.
We all know how smug people get when they really JUST listen to metal and they're given the excuse to sound overly cultured by saying they're into heavy metal, black metal, doom metal, gloom metal, speed metal, thrash metal, rash metal, death metal, rap metal, nu-metal, hardcore and emo (etc.) I get really bored when stood listening to how cultured some fuckers think they are because they've just reeled of the list above.
In my opinion, it's pretty much all pop music now, despite the genre they claim to be. You will just have to look for any sultanas amongst the rabbit droppings and don't be taken in when the next "new genre" rears it's ugly trendy head.