Not really. It's more like thinking Shakespeare is bad because all the characters are speaking Shakespearian [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iambic_pentameter].Kuhkmala said:He is simply offering an opinion based upon his own experiences with the game and Oblivion. His viewpoint is of a new person to the series, and it is how he sees the game. To call his opinion as invalid because it goes against your ideals doesn't sound very tolerant. His opinion is just as valid as yours, because it is what he believes and experienced.RAKtheUndead said:So, right, let me get this straight: You've never played the originals, correct? Then your view is invalid, and you're not entitled to complain about the game, unlike myself, who has played Fallout 1 and 2 in depth, and therefore has the entitlement to complain about the third game in the series.
Until you've played the originals, you really haven't got much of a clue about where Bethesda went wrong (and indeed, where it got things right). I hereby rescind the validity of your rant against the series until you've played 1 and 2, and realised exactly why they're retrofuturistic, and where the Brotherhood of Steel actually came from.
Actually, the story/environment is the reason why I'm willing to forgive Fallout's gameplay quirks. (Admittedly, the action-RPG "soggy cardboard combat" is not nearly as bad as it was in VTMB. Interestingly enough, that game can be seen as a distant cousin to the Fallout franchise, as it was developed by Troika games. Troika was founded by the people in charge of Fallout. Anyway, the influence shows.)Pezzer said:So basically all you care about is the story/environment and you don't give a **** about the gameplay or the hilarity of Fallout 3.
Oh Dear...
This precisely. If the game had just been called, I dunno, Postapocalypse, I would have enjoyed it more. But every time I paused the game reminded me that it was called FALLOUT. So I kept thinking about all the things it did wrong.RAKtheUndead said:So, right, let me get this straight: You've never played the originals, correct? Then your view is invalid, and you're not entitled to complain about the game, unlike myself, who has played Fallout 1 and 2 in depth, and therefore has the entitlement to complain about the third game in the series.
Until you've played the originals, you really haven't got much of a clue about where Bethesda went wrong (and indeed, where it got things right). I hereby rescind the validity of your rant against the series until you've played 1 and 2, and realised exactly why they're retrofuturistic, and where the Brotherhood of Steel actually came from.
I agree with the whole faction thing but you sound kinda like a Nazi.DalekJaas said:4. I CANT JOIN THE BAD GUYS!!!! I completely agreed with what the enclave was doing, screw the irradiated and save what's left of the world. But you can't join them, what's up with that?!?!
Oblivion had so many factions to join, you could really play how you wanted to. That brings me to 5.
What did Fallout 3 do wrong? Aside from not being Van Buren?Clashero said:This precisely. If the game had just been called, I dunno, Postapocalypse, I would have enjoyed it more. But every time I paused the game reminded me that it was called FALLOUT. So I kept thinking about all the things it did wrong.RAKtheUndead said:So, right, let me get this straight: You've never played the originals, correct? Then your view is invalid, and you're not entitled to complain about the game, unlike myself, who has played Fallout 1 and 2 in depth, and therefore has the entitlement to complain about the third game in the series.
Until you've played the originals, you really haven't got much of a clue about where Bethesda went wrong (and indeed, where it got things right). I hereby rescind the validity of your rant against the series until you've played 1 and 2, and realised exactly why they're retrofuturistic, and where the Brotherhood of Steel actually came from.
Also, OP: Stop comparing Fallout 3 and Oblivion. Fallout 3 should be compared to Fallout 1 and 2.
Mostly it had to do with some inconsistencies in the setting and the lack of freedom compared to previous titles.ThrobbingEgo said:What did Fallout 3 do wrong? Aside from not being Van Buren?Clashero said:This precisely. If the game had just been called, I dunno, Postapocalypse, I would have enjoyed it more. But every time I paused the game reminded me that it was called FALLOUT. So I kept thinking about all the things it did wrong.RAKtheUndead said:So, right, let me get this straight: You've never played the originals, correct? Then your view is invalid, and you're not entitled to complain about the game, unlike myself, who has played Fallout 1 and 2 in depth, and therefore has the entitlement to complain about the third game in the series.
Until you've played the originals, you really haven't got much of a clue about where Bethesda went wrong (and indeed, where it got things right). I hereby rescind the validity of your rant against the series until you've played 1 and 2, and realised exactly why they're retrofuturistic, and where the Brotherhood of Steel actually came from.
Also, OP: Stop comparing Fallout 3 and Oblivion. Fallout 3 should be compared to Fallout 1 and 2.
I haven't run into those problems. What's changed?Clashero said:Mostly it had to do with some inconsistencies in the setting and the lack of freedom compared to previous titles.ThrobbingEgo said:What did Fallout 3 do wrong? Aside from not being Van Buren?
Then you obviously didn't play the mind games with everyone and causing chaos. C'mon, there was so many good Twilight Zone references in there!I will say that one of the few parts of the game I liked was in the virtual reality land with your dog dad, but that got boring quickly too.
Oblivion has bland and boring environments that look like the same meadow over and over again. As for "wildlife", I found the mutants far more convincing than Giant Crocodile Men and Spider Women that so often roam the countryside of Oblivion.DalekJaas said:1. I am a massive Oblivion fan (insanely modded of course), but I still played vanilla oblivion and enjoyed it immensely. As such I was optimistic for fallout 3. In comparison to Oblivion, Fallout 3 has worse environments, less immersive scenery and what I call 'ridiculous' wildlife. I mean, somehow I expected it to be more realistic. Super mutants look absurd and speak ridiculously. There are crab things and giants. I thought hundreds of years of radiation would have made things look, well, more deadspacey. Not make them stronger.
Generic High Fantasy. Oblivion isn't even high fantasy with a twist. It's almost as unimaginative as an Orcs&Elves setting can get. At least Morrowind mixed it up a bit with an exotic setting, but no, Oblivion is as generic as it gets. Heck, Forgotten Realms have more flavor. And if you can't relate to the 1950s theme or understand it, I'm not about to write an essay explaining it and instead will say only "WHOOOOOSH!".DalekJaas said:2. Retrofuturism: This is purely personal taste but the I can't stand the 1950s theme of the game. I mean, I understood it, I figured the bombs fell in the 1950s. But when I was informed the bombs sometime in our future in made no sense whatsoever. I just don't get the 1950's theme when culture developed way more past the 50s.
No, just no. Fallout 3 voice actors did a far better job than Oblivion's. Yes, better than both voice actors in Oblivion...DalekJaas said:3. The voice acting is worse than oblivions, and that's saying something.
Now you're just making things up. Slavers, blowing up a city, raiders, etc. There's so many opportunities to be evil. And as for the Enclave, I don't remember Oblivion letting you join the Deadra...DalekJaas said:4. I CANT JOIN THE BAD GUYS!!!! I completely agreed with what the enclave was doing, screw the irradiated and save what's left of the world. But you can't join them, what's up with that?!?!
Oblivion had so many factions to join, you could really play how you wanted to. That brings me to 5.
Your gay fantasies aside, at least it beats "X Guild"...DalekJaas said:5. Ok, seriously, who thinks that the 'Brotherhood of Steel' is a cool name? It sucks. Its an awful name for the people you have to join. It reminds me of the homosexual steel mill workers from 'The Simpsons'.
Well, you can't really get an ironsight on a Minigun, but sure, I'll give you this one. Ironsights would have been a nice touch.DalekJaas said:6. This is a pet hate but; in any game with guns: THERE SHOULD BE IRONSIGHTS!!!!! I get so annoyed when I right click to raise the gun to my eye level and it doesn't happen. That is such a big immersion killer for me. I know its not an FPS..... but still, it drives me insane. Any good game with guns has sights of some kind. And snipers don't count, I need that ability for all weapons except the obvious ones (big ones). EH!
I couldn't get into Oblivion because it didn't really have a story, just a bunch of overdone cliches thrown together. Also, the setting was so uninteresting that I could barely sit through an hour without falling asleep. And seriously, CRABS that level up with you?DalekJaas said:7. I couldn't get immersed in the story because I had discovered within 2 hours of the game that its setting was so ridiculous that I just didn't care. Sure I was mildly impressed with the tutorial and saw some realism ( I think) in the poorly named RAD ROACHES but when you get outside...the guns have no sights and the environment is insanely dull.
Yes I blew up megaton, and thought it was boring. Then I killed everyone in that tower because I didn't care. The story just didn't pull me in, it may have worked wonders for you, but for me it was all too far fetched.
If that 20 minute section managed to get boring, you have a very short attention span...DalekJaas said:I will say that one of the few parts of the game I liked was in the virtual reality land with your dog dad, but that got boring quickly too.
In conclusion, I think Oblivion is a terrible game filled with broken mechanics and set in one of the most bland game worlds ever concieved. Both Morrowind and Fallout 3 are vastly superior to it.DalekJaas said:In conclusion, I don't like Fallout 3, I really, really don't. I'm sure people will flame me or whatever but remember this is purely personal opinion.