uhh you welcomeThePinkAcidSmurf said:I'd just want to say thank you Vault101 for bringing an interesting subject to my attention.Vault101 said:Snip
uhh you welcomeThePinkAcidSmurf said:I'd just want to say thank you Vault101 for bringing an interesting subject to my attention.Vault101 said:Snip
I will say 100% honestly Im not a troll, and the spelling, yes thats...somthing of an oversight on my partJacobShaftoe said:If your arguement comes down to that last paragraph, then why all the other illogical stuff? Also, I'm wondering just how much of a troll you are, what with casualy dropping a nice little statement alluding to possible disapproval towards gayness in general. Still, hats off for managing to cram so many grammatical, spelling and quite frankly basic reasoning mistakes into your reply, it lets me know this conversation should have been over before it began...Vault101 said:well I have also hated the "its nature" argument in raltion to alot of other unlrelated stuff (gayness for one)JacobShaftoe said:lol You got any idea how not vaguely even pretending to be logical the whole "It's nature" arguement is? Have you seen how wild hominids behave? Do you behave the same? If we have the ability to choose not to go with our "Nature", and natural animals are dicks, then maybe the hole in your non arguement is that, unlike animals, you get a choice and still act like a dick?
BTW this is all from an omnivore, I'm just okay with knowing I lack the ability at present to alter my diet. I know what I'm doing isn't optimal and I cope. The urge to prove your actoins right and good has outstripped your ability to reason methinks...
all Im saying is if we are humane as possible about it, I see no reason why its wrong to eat animals bred for the purpose of being eaten
1. Have you ever seen a sad chicken?AnOriginalConcept said:While I'm not vegetarian, a friend of mine does not eat meat for two reasons:
-Farming techniques are cruel
-Involves killing another living thing
Honestly, I agree with him, but I am more concerned with eating healthy and tasty food.
Animals like dogs and cats DO show emotion. Why not cows and chickens?
Also, I'm not certain what your point- any cause has extremists and people should be allowed to do as they wish as long as it does not impinge on others.
and youre probably right, which is fair enough, anyway thats not what Im arguingTreefingers said:But i think vegetarianism has plenty of benefits for humans, regardless of what anyone thinks of the animals at all.Vault101 said:snip
Efficiency, for one. It takes a large amount of grain to produce a relatively small amount amount of meat. If we ate less meat, we could feed A LOT more people. It'd be much better for the environment too.
Eloquently and succinctly put!Cherry Cola said:Why I think eating Meat is A-ok:
It's fucking delicious
And if we stop eating them we are contributing to the extinction of several different species.varulfic said:Here's why I think eating meat is A-ok: it's their destiny.
Think about it. Cows, chickens, pigs. They don't exist in the wild. Never have. Farmyard animals have been kept and bred by humans for thousands of years specifically to make them tastier to eat. They might have started out like their wild cousins but guided by human hands, they have evolved into something new. Conclusion? Humans are their gods, and their purpose in life is to be eaten.
/sigh. I know it is meat, it's just I don't put fish on the same level as mammals or birds. I understand that they have the same spectrum of emotions and feel pain etcetera, but I just don't see the killing of them as bad on a moral level. I understand that it was phrased badly and could be misinterpreted as literaly I do not think that it is meat.harmonic said:Fish are composed of meat. Yes, it's meat. You're killing fish so you can eat meat.PatrickXD said:snippidy
Yeh but if you look at a herbivores teeth, like a sheep, they're more squarish shape for grinding and chewing plant matter. Then if you look at human teeth its clear that we've evolved to eat both and anyone who wants a balanced diet shouldPontiusTM said:This is simply not true - in the best case we are omnivores, like rats and pigs. Ever had a look at a cat's od dog's teeth - they are carnivores. Those teeth are sharp as hell! The human body is not able to work uncooked meat, because of several biological reasons I'm not very into (something with our innards). I at least never saw a lioness cooking. So the "Dude - It's nature"-argument is 100% invalid.viranimus said:Yeah, its a part of nature. We are carnivores, we are top of the food chain, it is to be expected we eat meat.
Beside all the shiny biological stuff - here's some shiny philosophical stuff:
Is the only way to exalt over animals eating them? Would it not be of more value (morally and deontological) to refuse this behaviour and use our ratio do the job?
Besides: I'm vegetarian. I am not vegetarian, because I love animals.
I HATE PLANTS!!!
Except that not eating meat comes with health issues mainly a lack of ironSuijen said:The logic is quite simple.
Killing is inherently horrible, unless it's something essential. Carnivores need to kill, otherwise they die.
We humans are omnivores, and our bodies have adapted (as have our societies) to be able to absorb protein from many different sources, many of them not from animals.
Thus, our killing of animals is not because of necessity, but because of pleasure (taste), since we can get protein from other sources.
Remember, we can choose to eat meat and choose not to. The poor can't afford to, the wealthy have alternatives. We as a society can survive without the killing of animals. I personally don't care about animals too much, and just see them as chattel.