indeed how stupid of him to attempt to gain some support from the public, how dare he act like a real person instead of a fun sucking, money eating legal machine. people can boycott if they want to, it's not gonna keep the game out of your hands so THIS THREAD is pointless.Saviordd1 said:Now is Zenimax guilt free? Of course not, they're being stupid about the lawsuit to, but Notch is being just as equally (if not more so by bringing the public into it) about the whole thing.
He also offered to give up the trademark completely. And they declined. Although I don't have a law degree (although, you probably don't either), so there might be something I misunderstood. If you decide to reply to this I'd greatly appreciate it weren't as angry and purposely insulting as your post.Saviordd1 said:An article went up recently (This one: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.316261-Mojang-Offered-Up-Scrolls-Trademark-Bethsoft-Said-No)
and more butt hurt and flames were sputtered by Notch fanboys. Apparently Notch said that he was willing to change "Scrolls" to 'Scrolls: [some subtitle]' and now he's confused as to why he's getting sued still.
BECAUSE IT DOESN'T GET RID OF THE SCROLLS PART.
That's what Zenimax is peeved about, the Scrolls part, so adding a subtitle doesn't solve their problem.
Now is Zenimax guilt free? Of course not, they're being stupid about the lawsuit to, but Notch is being just as equally (if not more so by bringing the public into it) about the whole thing.
OH SNAP!Saviordd1 said:OK, for one, Notch isn't little, stop defending him.
Saviordd1 said:please for the love of god use your brain.
Actually deciding it over a game would be kind of gentlemanly. It's how major beefs were decided in the 16, 17 hundreds.Saviordd1 said:Why should they though? They have a legitimate concern with the name of notches game, why should they behave like 12 year olds and play a game over it?Terminate421 said:Boycotting a game is pointless
At some point you will give in and buy the game.
Bethesda aren't bad people, their legal team are just being assholes who won't do the Quake 3 match.
If he really did offer the trademark on the name Scrolls to them then this argument has no merit. By owning the trademark to the title Scrolls there would be no possible infringement on their Elder Scrolls trademark since they would own both and Notch couldn't claim any rights to it beyond his being allowed to use it for that one game. Which means he wouldn't be able to sue them or anything. The argument that using it would in some way confuse customers also holds no weight since the games are quite different, and the it makes use of one word from a trademarked title. A fairly common word that anyone can use, but which no one uses to actually refer to the Elder Scrolls.Saviordd1 said:Fourth, a article went up recently (This one: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.316261-Mojang-Offered-Up-Scrolls-Trademark-Bethsoft-Said-No)
and more butt hurt and flames were sputtered by Notch fanboys. Apparently Notch said that he was willing to change "Scrolls" to 'Scrolls: [some subtitle]' and now he's confused as to why he's getting sued still.
BECAUSE IT DOESN'T GET RID OF THE SCROLLS PART.
That's what Zenimax is peeved about, the Scrolls part, so adding a subtitle doesn't solve their problem.
Matters taken to court, including lawsuits such as this are matters of public record. There is no right or expectation of privacy, so Notch is doing nothing wrong by keeping his fanbase in the loop about what's going on, especially when he'll probably be making all of these points in court if things go that far. And I'm pretty sure his earlier comments, such as posting the initial letter and challenging them to a Quake deathmatch were probably made in a tongue in cheek fashion because the whole thing seemed like an over zealous lawyer taking the reigns and trying to bully a smaller company into changing a title without any real legal ground to stand on. I'm not sure anyone really thought at first that they would actually file a lawsuit.but Notch is being just as equally (if not more so by bringing the public into it) about the whole thing.
I'll be skipping Skyrim, but not because Notch says he's innocent. I don't play Minecraft, and likely never will as it simply doesn't interest me. I don't believe that Bethesda actually has a legal leg to stand on with this lawsuit though, and the whole thing smacks of trying to push around a smaller company (despite their success, Mojang is not in the same league as Zenimax in terms of resources) to get them to agree to a settlement that they shouldn't have to. So since I was on the fence about Skyrim before, I've decided to skip it entirely. No skin off my back since I've enjoyed games like Oblivion and FO3, but they certainly weren't anything spectacular.My overall point? Boycotting an awesome looking game because your overlord says hes completely innocent is just being stupid, please for the love of god use your brain.