Not my entire argument, but part of it regarding the licenses. What else is there to say? You can't do much more than trusting them, or anyone. There's a chance that Sony could suddenly discontinue their system by deactivating all their PS3s completely, rendering them unusable even for singleplayer (it's an example) - but we trust them that they won't. It's the same thing here, except that we have digital licenses.SaneAmongInsane said:So basically your whole counter arguement is "Naaahhhhh they won't do that!" <.<
Something only the future can tell.SaneAmongInsane said:The difference is, if I want, I can go ahead and hook up my Genesis. Get my Dynamite Headdy on. I buy an Xbone, a decade later I won't be able to play anything because they'll drop support for the console and I won't be able to log in.
They can easily put restrictions to disk copies as well if they wanted to, which just leads us back to trust. And why do we trust them? Because they want their profit and something like that would ruin their image.SaneAmongInsane said:If my "license" is my physical medium, I'm cool with that. This copy of Bioshock Infinite to my left here is mine, and I can do with it what I please. If my license is this abstract thing, they can place any sort of restriction they want on that. Don't like that.
Some of it isn't, some of it is. I'm not ignoring anything, but I've been reading a lot of comments and posts over the last days.fozzy360 said:Again, this isn't some blind hatred based off of nothing. To ignore the reason why there's so much anger is just as short-sighted, because this discussion goes far beyond which console someone prefers.
That's a new business model, and a successful one at that. You can't say it won't work since it already did - Steam, Spotify... It should be yours, but you know yourself that these fees were there before, but from publishers. Now Microsoft just provided an official option, so that it works the same for any game that might enable it.Longstreet said:1) The main point with this is, YOU DO NOT OWN GAMES. If this gets pushed through, you rent a game for 60 bucks. Hence why the can say "no you can not resell / lend this out" When you buy something, it's yours not the publishers(or retailers) anymore. YOU should be able to decide whether or not you would like to resell it, not some third party.
2)Although they improved it after cowering out of their previous stance on this subject (aka fuck you, you no give game away) It's still BS. Why can't i just mail him the disc, if he lives far away, or let him grab it out of my box if he wants to borrow it. Why do i have to do this complete circus act of jumping through hoops to please the M$ gods?
Apart from that, I think mailing a game is more work and harder than just sending a digital copy.
I don't there's much to comment on this one, I repeated myself about this so many times on this topic because people wouldn't read.Longstreet said:3) [...]
But yes, I meant the cloud servers, since they will be handling everything as far as news goes.
They're not forcing you to buy an XBone, are they? It's the package available right now, if you don't like it, don't buy it. Furthermore, I own a Kinect 1 already and have had a lot of fun with a couple of Kinect games. It works just fine.Longstreet said:4) [...]
And again, for the third time, no, it won't spay on you and you can turn it off completely. Check my second or third post her for an article confirming that.
It's not bs, it's an idea, or a vision. Forza is picking this idea up with their AI database, but that could be just the beginning. The only way to see the full possibilities of this technology is to wait for developers to adapt it once the console is out and old enough.Longstreet said:5) I know fuck all bout the hardware, some say it is about the same. I also saw one guy saying in a post in this thread that the PS4 is 50%more powerfull. I still have to see a single thread of evidence that Cloud Computing works, until that it is just BS.
Nope, a lot of 360 owners used it as an entertainment device especially later on, when Netflix came out as an app. The console is aimed to be liked by casuals, and they did good at that.Longstreet said:6)Here they just marketed it wrong, or at least that is their main error. People buy a Xbone for GAMING. Not for TV, not for a dvd player. Gaming.
I never said that the XBox is doing particularly better in any of these.Longstreet said:7-9) [...]
And no, they didn't lie in their presentations, not a single time.
Yep, the PS4 is less entertainment orientated and I'm on a gaming website. I knew I was going to get some hate at least, but I do think that this being a gaming website is no excuse for judging a product for partly false rumors.Longstreet said:10) It's not essentially the same, you pay ONE HUNDRED BUCK MORE for the Xbone. What do you get in return? Mandatory circus style hoop jumping, a device that can turn into a brick, a augmentation that is unwanted by most people and more DRM.
No they are not the same, PS4 is a gaming device (SUPPRISE, you are on a gaming website) The Xbone is more suited as a dvd player and dancing games.
The 24h problem has been discussed thoroughly and we all know that it is a problem, but personally I don't care about it too much thanks to the area I live in. That's another thing that you should decide about.RoBi3.0 said:No matter how you spin it an extra 100 dollars is a big deal. Yes the Xbox 1 comes with camera but if you could give to shits about it it is worth nothing. 100 dollars is a nice chunk of money I can decertify to stuff for my kids come Winter Solstice season.
All the game sharing benefits do not make up for the fact that if I don't connect to the Internet every 24 hour I can't play any games what so ever. The Internet is far from prefect it can and does go down. That is not even taking into account what happens if you have to move change ISP or whatever. This is not a ever pressing issue, but it still annoying that at some point through no fault of your own you will not be able to play game you paid for, not even the one that are not single player games. That's poor form. This will not change no matter how many people complain because that is how Microsoft will be managing used games. You sell your game they will then access your Xbox and erase said game from your hard drive. This is the biggest issue I have with the Xbox 1.
100 dollars is definitely a lot if you don't need the features - but if you don't need the features, you don't need an XBox One. This consoles has its advantages and disadvantages, so does Sony's PS4 and Nintendo's Wii U, now it's up to you what to choose.
I don't feel like commenting on the PSN once again, but if you have extra time on your hands feel free to read the rest of the thread. To sum it up: both have advantages and disadvantages (what a wonder, haha).RoBi3.0 said:PS+ to play multiplayer ps4 is a little sucky, but even before it had multiplayer rolled in it was one hell of a value. I have half a 500 gig hard drive full of free games and I have not even been paying for PS+ the entire time it has been out. Microsoft has announced it will be doing something similar, but nothing they have said yet leads me to believe it will be comparable in value. Also Sony is not requiring a PS+ Subscription to access 3rd party services like Netflix, which are something you pay for but can't use on Xbox unless you also pay for gold. I always felt that was pretty shitty.
You're right as in this is a little vague to say yet, but you can't really choose either side until both consoles are out (and for cloud computing, old enough). There's a lot of factors influencing this, so yeah.PoolCleaningRobot said:False. The ps4 has 50% more processing power than the xbox one and no amount of cloud magic can change that. Either Microsoft can stream the entire video footage from a game being processed somewhere else or they basically can't do anything
I have a theory for this in my first or second post, but other than that I can't tell you much else about it being useless to you. Some will appreciate it, other's don't.PoolCleaningRobot said:That's part of the point. It's like if I bought a pc and it came with a full blown, 5 mega pixel webcam that cost $100. That's cool and all, but I don't want it. I like that Sony gives us the choice. Microsoft has no reason to make this thing necessary for the console because we can control it just fine with a controller. Want a kinect? Pay $100 for it and enjoy.
PSN has been discussed enough in previous posts, so I'll just leave it as that:PoolCleaningRobot said:And the Xbox Gold vs PS+ totally does count. You can't do shit on an xbox without gold. You can't download certain apps like Netflix and you can't even use their freaking Internet Explorer. Microsoft is basically saying "Don't play multiplayer games? Then I hope you like eating shit because you can't play with any of my other toys either. And I still want more money so I hope you like dashboard advertisements. Thanks for your support, bye". Sony does the exact opposite. "You signed up for ps+? Thanks! I hope you like discounts, cloud storage, and free games too!". And I've never had trouble playing multiplayer on my ps3. Maybe now that they're charging for it I'll see some of these improvements xbox users keep talking about
As far as news goes, both have advantages and disadvantages. It seems like both services are moving closer together feature-wise though.
[I'm done with answering for today, typed too much. Keep your posts coming and discuss though, I'll try to address any unanswered posts again tomorrow.]