omega_peaches said:
So, I know, people said this about MW2 and Black Ops, but when those were coming out, I admit, I thought MW2 would be like Jesus' second coming, and I was kinda burnt out on CoD when Black Cops came out. World at War WAS the next CoD4, because it was basically a mod of CoD4 with WW2 weapons.
But, MW3 will put the focus back on gunplay, it will remove most of the BS from MW2, and other things.
So what are your opinions on the statement in the OP?
Sure, it'll be like COD4... and if by COD4 you mean "Still vastly inferior to a certain other FPS made by a certain other company." Yes, I agree, it'll be a clone of COD4.
Lol... seriously though, fanboyism aside, I appreciate the changes they're trying to make to the game so a lot of the horse shit that made me NEVER want to TOUCH a COD game again is taken out. What I still see them severely lacking is a focus on team-play. I'm not saying it's not there, and I'm not talking about the other cooperative game modes... but in their multiplayer game modes such as domination and that one with the bomb, I never felt like anyone else cared except for their own points. I would be very, VERY disappointed if I were to hop into a match and be on a team full of those brats who say, "WHAT ARE YOU DOING, WHY WOULD YOU PLANT THE BOMB!?" "... ummm, cause that's how you win?" "NO YOU NOOB, WE DON'T WANT TO WIN, WE JUST WANT TO INCREASE OUR KDR!" -.- That shit don't happen in Battlefield. You play as a team, and you play to win - otherwise your ass is conveniently gift wrapped for you in the form of a 105 mm howitzer cannon blast from an m1a2 abrams.
Seeing as how I only ever bought the other two modern warfares because I needed something new to hold me off till the next Battlefield - and since the next battlefield is coming out before MW3 - I don't think I'll ever touch this COD... cept maybe to rent it for it's single player cause I always liked their single player.