CodeOrange said:
Skyrim will be remembered as a game that could have been so much better. It's going to suffer the same fate as Oblivion, aging horribly with a bitter aftertaste of despondency and obstination. It'll happen, trust me.
Or better yet, just outsource the next game to a competent development team. Obsidian Entertainment would be a good place to start.
This a million times.
I fully hated Morrowind and Oblivion. I think Skyrim is a "good" game.(ive put in roughly 120 hours) Thats it. Just good. It isn't amazing, and it sure as hell isn't innovative or groundbreaking. Its watered down and streamlined enough to make it more accessible to more people. To increase sales.
There is nothing new of value in Skyrim. They added nothing new to the genre or games in general. (dragons are just another mob you end up one shotting, get a grip)
"Without a doubt, this has been our most ambitious project ever," said director Todd Howard. "
If this is the case, Skyrim should be considered a massive failure. Almost every feature in Skyrim is lacking something. Almost as if they purposefully didn't flesh them out. (my moneys on DLC)
It saddens me to see people thinking that Skyrim is "innovative" or "groundbreaking". I can only assume that they are either simply ignorant of whats available, or a simple minded fanboy.
All it does is reinforce another developers lackluster effort.