Woman Seduces Teen She Met on Xbox Live, Gets Busted

[Critical_Sneeze]

In the case of a fully grown man, its impossible without the use of a cocktail of drugs...

Weak men, strong women and rope don't exist?

 

[Cursed Frogurt]

Pretty sure we alread had a thread about this, but might be mistaken.

Also: still wrong, still not funny, still not "awesome for the dude".

This.

The double standards people have for this stuff is ridiculous. If it was a man and a 13 year old girl, people would be calling him a sick pedophile, but for a woman and a boy, there going to act like it's no big deal.

In jail being held with the option of bail? I think they are taking it pretty seriously. I'm just thinking about how fucked this is going to be for her kids... Imagine that shit tomorrow morning on the playground.

I'm talking about the posters on the Escapist with double standards.

I don't think anyone has said "Nice!" or posted the a south park youtube yet. There is no double standard, this shit is fucked up and we all think that.

"N-"

Aw. That situation was another one of those reverse-Susan-Boyle phenomenons. It's so interesting how reactions change purely due to physical appearances. If some smoking-hot woman had sex with him it still would've been just as emotionally scaring.

 

[Random berk]

In the case of a fully grown man, its impossible without the use of a cocktail of drugs...

Weak men, strong women and rope don't exist?

Thats another way of doing it, but I was kind o including that in the 'cocktail of drugs' scenario, since even then she'd still need a little blue pill to proceed from assault to rape. So I guess I should say its almost impossible, certainly harder than for a man to rape someone anyway.

 

[Critical_Sneeze]

In the case of a fully grown man, its impossible without the use of a cocktail of drugs...

Weak men, strong women and rope don't exist?

Thats another way of doing it, but I was kind o including that in the 'cocktail of drugs' scenario, since even then she'd still need a little blue pill to proceed from assault to rape. So I guess I should say its almost impossible, certainly harder than for a man to rape someone anyway.

I'm just not following where drugs come into this.

 

[Random berk]

In the case of a fully grown man, its impossible without the use of a cocktail of drugs...

Weak men, strong women and rope don't exist?

Thats another way of doing it, but I was kind o including that in the 'cocktail of drugs' scenario, since even then she'd still need a little blue pill to proceed from assault to rape. So I guess I should say its almost impossible, certainly harder than for a man to rape someone anyway.

I'm just not following where drugs come into this.

Drugs as in using some sort of tranquiliser in place of brute force, so that the guy wakes up tied to the bed, and the the blue pill is... well, you get the idea.

 

[matrix3509]

Is this really what the Escapist has turned into? A 4chan-esque debate about rape? Seriously this is the stupidest thread I have ever been witness to on this once awesome website. No I don't have anything more to add.

 

[Critical_Sneeze]

In the case of a fully grown man, its impossible without the use of a cocktail of drugs...

Weak men, strong women and rope don't exist?

Thats another way of doing it, but I was kind o including that in the 'cocktail of drugs' scenario, since even then she'd still need a little blue pill to proceed from assault to rape. So I guess I should say its almost impossible, certainly harder than for a man to rape someone anyway.

I'm just not following where drugs come into this.

Drugs as in using some sort of tranquiliser in place of brute force, so that the guy wakes up tied to the bed, and the the blue pill is... well, you get the idea.

Alcohol is an effective enough tranquiliser. And you surely don't think that an erection = consent.

 

[Random berk]

In the case of a fully grown man, its impossible without the use of a cocktail of drugs...

Weak men, strong women and rope don't exist?

Thats another way of doing it, but I was kind o including that in the 'cocktail of drugs' scenario, since even then she'd still need a little blue pill to proceed from assault to rape. So I guess I should say its almost impossible, certainly harder than for a man to rape someone anyway.

I'm just not following where drugs come into this.

Drugs as in using some sort of tranquiliser in place of brute force, so that the guy wakes up tied to the bed, and the the blue pill is... well, you get the idea.

Alcohol is an effective enough tranquiliser. And you surely don't think that an erection = consent.

No I don't, but woman can't really rape a man unless he has an erection. I suppose she could do other stuff, but I think rape in this context would mean forced penetrative sex, for which she would have to give the man an erection. Thats what the pill would be for, since presumably he wouldn't get an erection properly if he really, really didn't want sex.

 

[Critical_Sneeze]

In the case of a fully grown man, its impossible without the use of a cocktail of drugs...

Weak men, strong women and rope don't exist?

Thats another way of doing it, but I was kind o including that in the 'cocktail of drugs' scenario, since even then she'd still need a little blue pill to proceed from assault to rape. So I guess I should say its almost impossible, certainly harder than for a man to rape someone anyway.

I'm just not following where drugs come into this.

Drugs as in using some sort of tranquiliser in place of brute force, so that the guy wakes up tied to the bed, and the the blue pill is... well, you get the idea.

Alcohol is an effective enough tranquiliser. And you surely don't think that an erection = consent.

No I don't, but woman can't really rape a man unless he has an erection. I suppose she could do other stuff, but I think rape in this context would mean forced penetrative sex, for which she would have to give the man an erection. Thats what the pill would be for, since presumably he wouldn't get an erection properly if he really, really didn't want sex.

Dangerous reasoning. By the same train of thought, as long as a rapist makes a girl climax, it isn't rape.

 

[Random berk]

In the case of a fully grown man, its impossible without the use of a cocktail of drugs...

Weak men, strong women and rope don't exist?

Thats another way of doing it, but I was kind o including that in the 'cocktail of drugs' scenario, since even then she'd still need a little blue pill to proceed from assault to rape. So I guess I should say its almost impossible, certainly harder than for a man to rape someone anyway.

I'm just not following where drugs come into this.

Drugs as in using some sort of tranquiliser in place of brute force, so that the guy wakes up tied to the bed, and the the blue pill is... well, you get the idea.

Alcohol is an effective enough tranquiliser. And you surely don't think that an erection = consent.

No I don't, but woman can't really rape a man unless he has an erection. I suppose she could do other stuff, but I think rape in this context would mean forced penetrative sex, for which she would have to give the man an erection. Thats what the pill would be for, since presumably he wouldn't get an erection properly if he really, really didn't want sex.

Dangerous reasoning. By the same train of thought, as long as a rapist makes a girl climax, it isn't rape.

I don't think so. What I mean is, the woman can't physically have penetrative sex with the man if he doesn't want it. Without giving him a chemical stimulant, that is. A man on the other hand, can have penetrative sex with a woman against her will. Whether the victim climaxes in either situation is completely irrelevant.

But I digress. The overall point I was making is that the woman was still wrong, but in the thirteen year old's case, I don't think he was forced to have sex against his will, and I doubt he will suffer any legal or psychological consequences from this incident.

 

[Critical_Sneeze]

I don't think so. What I mean is, the woman can't physically have penetrative sex with the man if he doesn't want it.

To this I'm asking, why not? Guys can be really drunk.

But I digress. The overall point I was making is that the woman was still wrong, but in the thirteen year old's case, I don't think he was forced to have sex against his will, and I doubt he will suffer any legal or psychological consequences from this incident.

I agree with you there.

 

[Random berk]

I don't think so. What I mean is, the woman can't physically have penetrative sex with the man if he doesn't want it.

To this I'm asking, why not? Guys can be really drunk.

Ah, but there's a difference between a girl forcing a man to have sex using viagra and ropes, and some drunken idiot waking up in bed with some girl he doesn't know with no recollection of how he got there. Odds are if they're drunk, then they'll consent, even if its not one of their better judgement calls. If they are so drunk that they can't do anything to resist the advances of whoever might be taking them to bed, then they aren't going to be any use to a woman anyway. They'd basically be passed out at that stage.

 

[katsumoto03]

Pedophilia and rape? Damn, that's one sick fucking woman.

This was pedophilia, due to the ages of both people involved, but it can't really be called rape. Not that I'm defending the woman, pedophilia alone is well worth the jail sentence, but rape implies the child was forced to have sex. Its pretty damned hard for a woman to force a man, even a younger man to have sex, and if I remember what early puberty was like, I doubt the kid needed convining, or if he even cared that she was much older than him. He'd probably have beenhappy enough once she had two legs and a vagina. Hell, he wasn't even negatively affected by this. His friends will most likely commend him for geting laid, being kids themselves, the article would have mentioned if she'd been infected with something, and if he impregnated her, I seriously doubt he'll have to share responsibility for it.

Also, it is probably for these reasons that when a woman manages to 'rape' a man (or boy) the courts tend not to take it as seriously. In the case of a fully grown man, its impossible without the use of a cocktail of drugs, and in the case of a boy, its pedophilia, but not forcible rape.

Again, I'm not condoning what she did at all, merely offering what I feel is a detached and logical view of the matter.

Yeah, I just thought it said rape somewhere.

Ah well, I guess I'll have to be satisfied with statutory rape then.



...


That was a joke.

 

[ph0b0s123]

Well, this is an open and shut story. Unlike the woman with the 16 year old last year, there is no moral ambaguity here. It was wrong and she is going to jail, job done. And since the person is way under the age of consent of most civilised countries it is statutory rape. He was not old enough to give consent. In the same way he is not old enough to sign a contract.

I feel sorry for the victims family, but they are not blameless. I would not give a kid a mobile phone without being able to monitor it. Even if it is just to see that there is a lot of communication with someone who is not one of their fellow children....

 

[Da pyro man 999]

Did the teen mind any of this.

 

[Random berk]

Actually, men will automatically get erections from sexual stimulation even if they don't want to. So a bullet to the gut or knee is all that's needed.

Do you find getting shot in the stomach or knees sexually stimulating?

 

[Random berk]

Actually, men will automatically get erections from sexual stimulation even if they don't want to. So a bullet to the gut or knee is all that's needed.

Do you find getting shot in the stomach or knees sexually stimulating?

That's so they don't fight. After that, any sexual stimulation will cause an erection, even if it's unwanted.

Huh. I would have thought it was possible to resist it under certain circumstances.

Hell, if I was about to be raped, I'd still fight even if I had been shot. I'd fight until I was literally incapable of moving. Unless of course I was about to be raped by a very good looking girl, in which case it'd probably be completely consensual, lol.