ogreloot said:
The history textbooks, all lies and mistruths
Like what? It's just a bold statement to make and I'm intrigued.
As for the original discussion I'll go with Jane Eyre. I really gave it a go but it just angered me. I held a grudge against the Brontes for years, then I read Wuthering Heights. What a book! I also did not get on with Turn Of The Screw, utterly pointless garbage and the literary equivalent of spunking over someones face without invitation or even offering to return the favour.
Anyway, I do a literature degree so I read at least one book a week. I'd rather talk about the favourites
Mary Shelley - Frankenstein (AWFULLY written, but the story was gripping. A bit like why Twilight is popular)
Anthony Burgess - A Clockwork Orange (It's a real skill that he could make the language so understandable, by the end of the book you could get all the slang despite it never being explained.)
Joseph Conrad - Heart Of Darkness (The best writer of the English language I have ever read, yet he is Polish and did not speak fluent English until his 20's. Apocalypse Now was based on this.)
John Fowles - The French Lieutenants Woman (Just craps all over itself in places, throws form to the wind and even has 3 endings.)
A bit worried that so many people have said Catcher In The Rye is bad, I have JUST bought it.