That must've been a horrible experience.. Normally books are better than the movies, but I think Twilight makes an exception there.Gabanuka said:Twilight, it was sugested by a group of girls and my ***** of a teacher said ok.
Ok, that's understandable. I didn't mean to sound pissy, but it is one of my favourite books. I'd still suggest you read it again though, maybe you'll like it more after some time has passed.-=Spy=- said:I understand that is from a literary standpoint, but I found that I just couldn't care about this Siddhartha's journey. In addition, our teacher was reading it to us, and she doesn't quite have what I would call a lovely voice.thethingthatlurks said:Aside from the whole quest for enlightenment, and microcosm of human existence, yes? It's one of the best books ever written, but maybe you didn't take your time with it...-=Spy=- said:Siddhartha. Nothing happened within that book.
I thought that the point of that book was to show that Frankenstein WAS the monster, instead of his creation.Kagim said:AjimboB said:So why the hell are we going over it in school as if it's a great piece of literature?Kagim said:To be fair Mary Shelly wrote that while drunk off her ass with a couple friends on a rainy day.AjimboB said:Probably Frankenstein.
I expected the book to be interesting, but it was just soo boring and badly written. I was like "this is what pasted for horror in the 1800s?!"
Because we live in a world where everyone thinks Frankenstein is the monster.
Yes, I read that book in grade nine and it sucked -1st COUSINS GET TOGETHER! EWWWWW....dududf said:The chrysalids.
I'm an avid reader but I just hated that book.