Schools shouldn't let you read Shakespeare to begin with. Considering he was a playwright it's far more logical to watch plays or movies based on his work. Adapting a Shakespeare play to a novel (even though generally not much is adapted and you're just reading the transcript of the play) is like adapting a video game to film. It just doesn't work.Vhlad said:Actually, shakespeare was worse than the bible. I remember covering a different shakespeare book every year for english in highschool. Many of my classmates had poor writing skills, bad spelling, bad grammar, bad punctuation, and weak vocabulary. I found it very frustrating to witness the school system focus on shakespeare when students needed to learn proper english language skills. IMO covering shakespeare is not an appropriate use of class time. The goal of highschool english instruction should be to improve written and oratory skills in modern english. The language style and format used in shakespeare is irrelevant.Vhlad said:The bible
...and yet my teachers seam to enjoy that. I feel like a sell out when I write it though.dashiz94 said:You sir, I admire. That book was absolutely horrid, the symbolism in it was downright pretentious if nothing else.ZephrC said:Absolutely, undeniably, and extremely emphatically: The Scarlet Letter. The worst book ever written. Dear God that was awful.
I thought it was an excellent book. I listed a few that I didn't like, then I said ones that I had to read at school/uni that I did like. Thought I made it obvious, but I suppose it does look a little ambiguous.L1250 said:Question: What exactly is your opinion of A Clockwork Orange? It seems from your post that you're mentioning it among books you hate, but you didn't actually say your opinion of the book, only that you thought Burgess was a skilled writer.AndyVale said:Anyway, I do a literature degree so I read at least one book a week. I'd rather talk about the favourites
Anthony Burgess - A Clockwork Orange (It's a real skill that he could make the language so understandable, by the end of the book you could get all the slang despite it never being explained.)
Did you not enjoy it because it was a little to graphic and viseral, or because it was dull?Marter said:Probably "All Quiet on the Western Front", this year.
I really did not enjoy that book.
I am with you there.Spencer Petersen said:Sometimes I wonder if some teachers make you read a book that they know is shit but try to convince you that it is the most amazing thing ever just to test you
It was not my most favorite book. But I respected the shit out of it. It was pretty amazing how you understand everything towards the end.AndyVale said:Anyway, I do a literature degree so I read at least one book a week. I'd rather talk about the favourites
Anthony Burgess - A Clockwork Orange (It's a real skill that he could make the language so understandable, by the end of the book you could get all the slang despite it never being explained.)
What did the plot do for the 365 pages then?Summerspeak said:The Summer Holiday.
365 pages of "Nothing", I don't understand how you can write a book in which nothing happens in the plot. Oh boy, did that book turn me brain dead.
The issue is, that school curriculum force you to read it as a serious story of love e.c.t, whereas Shakespeare meant it more as a parody of love stories of that kind. When read in that way its actually quite amusing.OmegaXzors said:I honestly was mature about reading the books we were required to throughout school. None of them were terrible but some of them were boring as fuck.
I'd say the biggest over hyped piece of shit I had to read three times in my life would be Romeo and Juliet. It's the worst Shakespeare play (in my opinion). I have all his work in a giant, super well made book. I don't like this story. Sucks ass.