Worst sequel ever
- Thread starter gorfias
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Well, I can't say MW2 because I never actually played it - but well, that's because they're still trying to charge £39:99 for 6 hours of game (for me.) But from what I heard of the plot, I was pretty damned disappointed.
You know what? Fallout 2. I loved Fallout 1, and Fallout 2 gave me a frakking stick and told me to go fight beetles, and it was so full of utterly arbitrary 'YOU FAIL' segments that it just plain infuriated me.
You know what? Fallout 2. I loved Fallout 1, and Fallout 2 gave me a frakking stick and told me to go fight beetles, and it was so full of utterly arbitrary 'YOU FAIL' segments that it just plain infuriated me.
Devil May Cry 2. Oh my god, that game RUINED DMC for me. I couldn't even begin to appreciate DMC 3 because of that game.
You never had a problem with building a ranged character, then getting asked to punch a guys lights out in the very beginning? >.> my first time through, I could not beat him..Serenegoose said:
But heres a bad sequel. Disciples 3. It's a complete waste compared to 2.
oplinger said:
Not really. I stacked int/cha and told him I've obviously passed since I got to him. He agreed. The tough bit was getting past the scorpions to him, especiallyif they poison you. I didn't have melee or unarmed skill, so it was like 30% chance to hit. I made the stupid mistake of assuming that, like in fallout 1, they'd at least give me a frakking gun.
Really? I thought Revolver was the worse of those two.Dango said:
For me, it's Wing Commander Prophecy (seriously did WC4 need a sequel?), Final Fantasy X-2, and Blood Omen 2.
BO2's fun and all but seriously has no purpose in the over all story.
Well, I don't really care about the sports games, because there are a segment of people who genuinely enjoy them, and if they are perfectly willing to spend their money on the new game every year, that's none of my business.
I will say, however, that the most disappinting sequel I've ever played would be FarCry 2. The game was absolutely beatiful to look at, and I found an almost endless supply of amusement with the fire physics. However, between a lack of incentive to progress the story and the added fact that in 13 minutes I came across 7 checkpoints that all unfailingly ended in a shootout, the game just wasn't that fun.
I will say, however, that the most disappinting sequel I've ever played would be FarCry 2. The game was absolutely beatiful to look at, and I found an almost endless supply of amusement with the fire physics. However, between a lack of incentive to progress the story and the added fact that in 13 minutes I came across 7 checkpoints that all unfailingly ended in a shootout, the game just wasn't that fun.
Methinks the case expenses would outweigh any eventual gain. Perhaps we should settle out of court.Gardenclaw said:
Nukes. Loooootsss of nukesSquilookle said:
Oh and the Fuel Air Launcher, an RPG that fires mini fuel air bombs, totally awesome.
And the motorcycle with two miniguns.
And the sports car with a foldout Missile launcher.
And the Devastator ;P
I don't think you can really get much worse than the Rayman series. Three absolutely classic platformers, a fourth one in development, everyone's crazy excited, then suddenly... (terribly) motion controlled repetitive minigame compilation!
The Rayman Raving Rabbids series is supposed to be a spinoff, and they're making a classic Rayman game now anyway.British-Hobo said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayman_Origins
Oh aye, I know, I'm insanely hyped up for that. But IIRC, wasn't Raving Rabbids originally supposed to be a fourth platformer in the series, and a trailer was released to that effect, but at some point they completely changed tack and created the abomination that is Rayman Raving Rabbids?ALuckyChance said:
Well, the final product was a spinoff regardless, so I don't see the problem.British-Hobo said:
Also, here's a tip: there's a little thing called opinion. Saying a game is an abomination is fine, but try 'I think the game is an abomination.' That way, you don't come off as pretentious. Not that I'm saying you are you are, of course.
*settles in with you*Dango said:
I agree with you it was fun but after playing with Jack Marston I completley hated the game
San Andreas. I know everyone here is like "San Andreas good, GTA4 bad.", but San Andreas was Vice City with extra features and variations. GTA4 took a shot with entirely different gameplay which I actually enjoyed because the previous games had a SHIT load of inherent gameplay flaws (like trying to play the game without cheats, getting 3 stars means you're fucked etc.)