Treeinthewoods said:
Ah, see to me Peter Parker is a highly intelligent photographer who works for the daily planet and lives in New York. Skin tone has zero effect on his character, black people can be raised by their aunts and uncles in the suburbs, get bit by spiders and be really really smart just the same as white people.
To me it's all Peter's personality traits (shy, awkward, nerdy) and the way he acts out his fantasy of being a total smart ass when he wears his costume that define him. Any person of any race could be all of those things and the character doesn't change.
Same for Bruce Wayne, why couldn't a wealthy black child watch his parents be killed by Joe Chill before deciding to become a vigilante? To paraphrase the movie, "It's not who we are inside that defines us, it's what we do." Basically, to me, heroes are not defined by race but by personality and the action they take.
Ok, but it really doesn't matter what he is "to you". The character Peter Parker
is white. Your vision of the character can be WHATEVER you want. But by the DEFINITION OF CHARACTER, Peter Parker is white.
Same with Bruce Wayne.
See, when you start asking, "Why can't this character be black?",
YOU are actually stirring up racism. It's not a racist question in itself, but it brings about conversation of inherent differences between races, and whether or not they affect characterization.
Long story short, with a main character, race matters.
Just to clarify my points...
Bruce Wayne is white.
Peter Parker is white.
If DC comics wants to make an unexplained alternate universe where this is not true, they have every right to. However, it's going to make more people angry than it will satisfy snobbish "revolutionaries" who want to change things to make them PC in an attempt to repair years of bigotry and hate which has been slowly dying by itself, and only resurfacing when someone adds fuel to the fire...
Like I said, I don't see the point.