Would you use a teleporter?

Recommended Videos

viking97

New member
Jan 23, 2010
858
0
0
John the Gamer said:
If technology of that level ever becomes commonsight/reality, I'll just modify my genetic structure to grow wings so I can fly and use that instead of teleportation.
well, by modifying your genetic structure to grow wings, it would either take a long time for the to grow and be quite painful, (did you ever have growing pains as a teenager?) or happen very quickly and be excruciatingly painful. unless of course this was to happen in a doctors office or something, and some sort of sedative was used. i'd prefer a jet pack, myself. would be a helluva lot faster and less tiring, unless they gave you some sort of metabolism modifying gene as well, which would mean eating ALL THE TIME to supply the energy needed. unless of course...*goes on forever*

OT well, yes. i don't believe in any sort of "soul", i believe we are a construct of molecules working in a fantastically complex way, and even if the teleporting process was simply to scan my molecules and then send this data to another transporter which then rebuilds me using the same molecules (any molecule of any particular pure substance is identical, at least that is if i understood me chemistry class correctly) in the exact same structure, and then disintegrating the first me, i'd still do it, because, from my point of view, all that happened is i moved from one place to another.

i don't see anything ethically wrong about this, unless maybe the first me felt pain while being destroyed, nor do i see anything dangerous, unless the power were to go out during the process or the signal to be interrupted, so this process would need numerous fail safes to be safe, but if it was proven to be at least as safe as say driving the freeway, i'd do it.
 

AmayaOnnaOtaku

The Babe with the Power
Mar 11, 2010
990
0
0
VicunaBlue said:
They show up in all sorts of science fiction, and they usually have one thing in common: Their process involves either converting you into some sort of energy, or breaking you up into particles, then reassembling you at the destination. Now while they are obviously others, MANY use this model.
As in to go back in time or just to travel?

Be awesome for travel. no more baggage fees or long drives!. Not to mention how much money you save no more expensive plane/train/bus tickets. Never have to pay gas for a car, or car payments/insurance.

I would prefer the whole mage portal or hearthstone idea since there is no upkeep and little to no cost for setup.
 

Roamin11

New member
Jan 23, 2009
1,521
0
0
Yes, because if its near isntant than that is still not quick enough for where I need to go!
 

Nukey

Elite Member
Apr 24, 2009
4,125
0
41
I would.

While it does kill you, it brings you back just as you where before you left (unless, of course, you decide to go into the teleporter with a fly) instead of making a new you. Your energy, which one could argue is the living portion of you, remains intact, instead of being replaced, so therefore what comes out is you, not a clone.
 

VGStrife

New member
May 27, 2009
143
0
0
I'd go with folding space, not sure about de/remolecularisation(sp?) though. Probably.
 

_Cake_

New member
Apr 5, 2009
921
0
0
Magic ones yes, but if I'm basically destroyed then just cloned an another point no. To be honest I would be afraid for my soul.
 

Death God

New member
Jul 6, 2010
1,754
0
0
Depends on how many people try it before me and came out fine. But I'd still probably go even if I was the first.
 

Dorian6

New member
Apr 3, 2009
711
0
0
Dags90 said:
Dorian6 said:
But how would they know? Every time Picard would use a transporter, it would destroy him and create an exact copy somewhere else, with the exact same thoughts and memories. As far as the people operating the machine are aware, the transporter was a complete success, and the duplicate has no idea that he's not the original.
I don't get why you put "as far as they know it was a complete success" without ever explaining how that would be an incorrect assessment. If he's exactly the same as the original Picard but in a different place in space-time, it's a success.
The original Picard is DEAD! It wouldn't be disassembling his atoms and sending them somewhere else. He'd be destroyed on the subatomic level and the machine would create a new one at the specified location! If you kill someone and replace them with an exact copy, the former is still dead
 

RyQ_TMC

New member
Apr 24, 2009
1,002
0
0
Dags90 said:
It depends if you subscribe to mind-body dualism or not. If not, then it doesn't matter because your soul, consciousness, etc. are based on physical atoms and their arrangement.

If not then presumably you'd need a teleporter which could teleport all the supernatural stuff as well as atoms.
I thought I'd interject here. We don't even need to resort to "supernatural stuff" for that argument to work. What I mean is that all the particles that make you up don't just hang in one place. They are in constant motion. Even if we had technology allowing us to record the position of each and every particle in our bodies - and I don't think that will ever be possible - reassembling them in the same conformation would just give you a neatly assembled mass of stationary particles, i.e. a corpse. You'd probably also need the technology to also record the specific energy and vector of each of the particles and somehow transmit that as well - and somehow do it in a short enough time for them not to change in the origin.

Bottom line: you cannot stop an organism's functioning and restart it. Suspended animation still involves metabolic functions going on. And no, Venter's group didn't "create life" earlier this year, whatever the media might have said.
 

TheHecatomb

New member
May 7, 2008
528
0
0
No, I don't think I'd have the guts to use a teleporter in the breaking down / building up type of thing. I would give portals a chance though.
 

John the Gamer

New member
May 2, 2010
1,021
0
0
viking97 said:
John the Gamer said:
If technology of that level ever becomes commonsight/reality, I'll just modify my genetic structure to grow wings so I can fly and use that instead of teleportation.
well, by modifying your genetic structure to grow wings, it would either take a long time for the to grow and be quite painful, (did you ever have growing pains as a teenager?) or happen very quickly and be excruciatingly painful. unless of course this was to happen in a doctors office or something, and some sort of sedative was used. i'd prefer a jet pack, myself. would be a helluva lot faster and less tiring, unless they gave you some sort of metabolism modifying gene as well, which would mean eating ALL THE TIME to supply the energy needed. unless of course...*goes on forever*

OT well, yes. i don't believe in any sort of "soul", i believe we are a construct of molecules working in a fantastically complex way, and even if the teleporting process was simply to scan my molecules and then send this data to another transporter which then rebuilds me using the same molecules (any molecule of any particular pure substance is identical, at least that is if i understood me chemistry class correctly) in the exact same structure, and then disintegrating the first me, i'd still do it, because, from my point of view, all that happened is i moved from one place to another.

i don't see anything ethically wrong about this, unless maybe the first me felt pain while being destroyed, nor do i see anything dangerous, unless the power were to go out during the process or the signal to be interrupted, so this process would need numerous fail safes to be safe, but if it was proven to be at least as safe as say driving the freeway, i'd do it.
Like I care, I'll just make an exact clone of myself, and make the changes to him during his (excellerated) growth. Even if I would have to die. I could always download my conscience to the clone-body (yes that was in a movie). And though that would pretty much mean that "I" die, I'd be willing to make that sacrifice; it's for the survival and awesomeness of the being known as 'ME'(...) Or maybe I should seek out a psychiatrist, what do you think?....... :D

P.S.: I'd rather go through excrusiating pains to grown wings and get an awesome mutant body-thing, than use instant teleportation and get fat like the people from Wall-E or something.
 

TehIrishSoap

New member
Aug 18, 2010
382
0
0
That Would Be The Coolest Thing EVER!!!!!!
Just Imagine Teleporting To New York, In The Middle Of A Conversation....
 

ajofflight

New member
Jun 5, 2010
379
0
0
It could always create a wrinkle (fold in space) and instantly pop you into wherever the set destination was. As for breaking down into particles and moving, yes, that would almost definitely kill you. Probably.
 

duchaked

New member
Dec 25, 2008
4,451
0
0
if it worked properly...heck yeah

what if instead of breaking you apart it was more like...a portal?