Wranglers: Hobbit Production Responsible for 27 Animal Deaths

Recommended Videos

PunkRex

New member
Feb 19, 2010
2,533
0
0
Fire the guy/gal responsible. His/her job includes protecting these animals I assume, and if its true he/she ignored it then even more of a reason to do so. I hate animal cruelty, more so then I hate PETA... I do hate PETA though...
 

Xdeser2

New member
Aug 11, 2012
465
0
0
Im a person generally in support of animals being treated well,

but PETA, this is fucking ridiculous -__-

Now, if you excuse me, Im going to go back to enjoying a delicious bacon double cheeseburger from Jack in the Box
 

sethisjimmy

New member
May 22, 2009
601
0
0
You people are stuck on the PETA aspect of this story. PETA could cure cancer and you guys would find a way to spin it as a bad thing.
Yes PETA is a very misguided and in almost all aspects terrible organization, however, 27 animals seems like way too high of a number to me. I suppose if some of these animals have naturally short life-spans they could see a high death toll over the course of a few years, but it still seems way out of proportion.
 

Godhead

Dib dib dib, dob dob dob.
May 25, 2009
1,692
0
0
Well it doesn't appear that this has been posted yet. (Hobbit is going to be awesome I can't wait ;saldjf;lsakdjflaksjdL;SAKJ;ALDSKJF;DALSKJF. Really looking forward to it.)

 

Sonic Doctor

Time Lord / Whack-A-Newbie!
Jan 9, 2010
3,042
0
0
If only it would be scantily clad women doing the protesting, other than that, this story does nothing too me and I will be going to see the movie as I planned.

Angel Molina said:
As soon as I finished reading the paragraph were PETA decides to go ahead and protest (even if Jackson adopted three pigs after the incidents), I couldn't help but remember this web comic:

(Also, I know this img. is too big, but i don't know how to make it smaller, does anyone know how to shrink images? Thanks in advance)

Basically, you put spoiler tags around the image tags so that the picture doesn't show up automatically and make your post gigantic. That way people only have to load the image if they click the spoiler box.

[/spoiler ]
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,952
0
0
Well. that is as much justification as is needed to cease production on this furry footed feature. None too soon either I might add. Alright, pack it all up and send it back to the shire.
 

mooncalf

<Insert Avatar Here>
Jul 3, 2008
1,164
0
0
On the one hand, avoidable animal deaths sound horrible and probably should be investigated to ensure that anyone who can be held accountable *is* held accountable. On the other hand, PETA routinely kill animals on purpose and pointing their blackened fingers at other kettles is just some of the most laughable bull I can imagine.

sethisjimmy said:
You people are stuck on the PETA aspect of this story.
+1 sethisjimmy reminding us that even the devil can sometimes speak the truth, if only by coincidence. So while we merrily sharpen our pitchforks to skewer that atrocious farce of an organisation, let us not forget that if there is a kernel of truth to this story, then whatever its *lack* of a connection with the actual filming practices of Peter Jackson et al. we should still say "hey hang on, innocent fluffies shouldn't be randomly destroyed! INTENTIONALLY destroyed for food, sure, but by accident is just mean and sloppy!"
 

DugMachine

New member
Apr 5, 2010
2,566
0
0
Shame that the animal deaths were avoidable but happened anyways.

Coming from PETA though? They need to get their heads out of their ass and fuck right the hell off. When your organization spends more money on ads, protests and the killing of animals more than actually SAVING the fucking animals you're doing it wrong.
 

Sean951

New member
Mar 30, 2011
650
0
0
Formica Archonis said:
Grey Carter said:
The American Humane Association confirms that no animals were harmed during the actual filming, but admits that it only monitors film sets, not the facilities where animals are housed and trained.
Why am I not surprised? I've yet to see a group with "humane" in the title that wasn't a bunch of incompetents or an outright racket.
I would recommend you look up what the American Humane Society actually does before dissing it and incompetent.

Here [http://www.americanhumane.org/] is their home page.
 

ResonanceSD

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 14, 2009
4,538
5
43
thesilentman said:
...And not a single fuck was given from me. And how are these guys are going to get away with arguing this? Seems like they lost all cred they had a while back... (I've never heard of these guys.)
Because vested interests will get outraged about anything they need to. It's PETA for god's sake, they're nuts.
 

YodaUnleashed

New member
Jun 11, 2010
221
0
0
Yeah thousands of animals die on a daily basis to sate many peoples hunger for meat or to keep their feet warm and now that a few die during the production of a film people go crazy. I mean a lot more goblins and orcs will have died as a direct result of filming, I don't hear anyone standing up for their rights!
 

Doom972

New member
Dec 25, 2008
2,312
0
0
Quaxar said:
Doom972 said:
Quaxar said:
All I read was the Hobbit is getting free advertisement from naked crazy chicks. Good for you, Peter Jackson!
Yes, I needed a good reminder about The Hobbit.
What was that about crazy naked chicks?
Edited that post for easier understanding. I'm assuming PETA is going to protest the only way they can... maybe they'll go with fake blood but my hope is on the naked models dressed as hobbits bludgeoning rabbits with battleaxes.
Awesome. As long as PETA's message gets lost in boobs and silliness, I'm fine with whatever kind of protest that they want to make.
 

kuolonen

New member
Nov 19, 2009
290
0
0
I came here expecting to read many many preaching posts about treatment of animals and yet find myself thoroughly underwhelmed by the amount of post in support of these animals. Is this really the same website where I found myself reading about people defending the the ethical treatment of cockroaches?

[link]http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.387582-Researchers-Remotely-Control-Cockroaches-With-Electronic-Backpack?page=1[/link]

OT: The mandatory joke about how many of the animals were killed for Peter Jackson to munch down.
 

Elvaril

New member
Dec 31, 2010
124
0
0
Peter Jackson just updated his facebook page with his own post about the allegations.
http://www.facebook.com/notes/peter-jackson/animal-allegations-on-the-hobbit/10151300381651558
Going to post the entire thing in a spoiler as well as the link.
Animal Allegations on The Hobbit
by Peter Jackson on Tuesday, November 20, 2012 at 12:25am
The Hobbit production has always instituted swift and immediate investigations in to any concerns of any kind over the treatment of animals under its care. A prompt and thorough investigation into the recent unsubstantiated allegations by the American organisation, PETA, in to the ?hobbling? of a horse during the making of The Hobbit was undertaken. No evidence of such a practice was found to have occurred at any time. Further, the production contacted the owner of the horse concerned who provided the following statement: ?I am 100% happy with the return of Shanghai and his condition. In the term that he was leased he was picked up and returned to me two times. On both occasions there was not a mark on him and he was healthy and happy. He has shown no signs of ill-treatment. I would not hesitate in leasing him to the movie again.?

To date, the only horse wranglers whose treatment of animals fell below the production?s standard of care seem to be the two wranglers who have chosen to level this new accusation on the eve of the premiere of the first Hobbit film and who were dismissed by the production over a year ago. Reports of their actions are documented in several written statements dating back to October 2011.

The production regrets that PETA has chosen to make such a serious accusation, which has distressed many of the dedicated Kiwis who worked with animals on the films - including trainers, wranglers, care-givers, farm workers and animal health care professionals - without properly vetting the source from which they received this information.

The production has been inundated with calls of support as regards to this matter, including the following statements:


FROM: DR JULIA BRYCE BVSc
?From December 2010 till July 2012, this practice was the primary Veterinary care giver for the horses and livestock in the care of ?Three Foot Seven?.

During this period we were consulted promptly in cases of injury and illness. We were also consulted routinely about ongoing veterinary care and preventative medicine.

If referral was required to a specialist clinic or Massey Equine Clinic, this occurred promptly. As occurs in normal practice there are incidences and injury which may result in an unfavourable outcome and others that recover completely; like the young goat who fractured a front leg but recovered completely after 6 weeks in a cast and hospital rest, or the rooster who spent two weeks at our clinic with a foot infection.

These and other animals in the care of Three Foot Seven Limited received the best available treatment to ensure their recovery, their welfare and return to good health was paramount to those in charge. At no time were we concerned about the welfare and on-going treatment of animals under our care.?


FROM: JOY GRAY - FARMER
?I was appalled to hear of the wild claims being made in the media by PETA. I and my family own the farm which the Hobbits used to train their animals. Myself, my manager, my children and grand-children saw nothing to make us uncomfortable or give us cause for concern. We all had totally free access to all activities at all times. In fact, the animals were wonderfully looked after, being well-fed, well-housed, and well-treated. As both farmers and dedicated horse people ourselves we would have stood for nothing less. I myself ride horses, all my children rode competitively and now my grandchildren ride.

I was involved in Pony Club for many years and was District Commissioner for the Wellington Pony Club. My manager was totally aware of all that was happening with the Hobbits and he is outraged at these false claims.

The sixty horses, the cattle, oxen, sheep, goats, dogs, pigs, hens etc. were given professional and humane treatment.?


FROM: JED BROPHY - ACTOR (NORI)
?As an actor and animal trainer who has worked on large scale productions here in New Zealand, in particular The Lord of the Rings Trilogy and more recently, The Hobbit, I am flabbergasted to read this morning of the accusations levelled at the production by PETA. With a production as large as The Hobbit, filmed over such an extensive period the care of the animals used in filming was exceptional. The entire time we were on set, and when we were training with the animal wranglers employed to look after and train the animals for filming, I observed no mistreatment - in fact the opposite is true.

The animals were treated with the utmost care and responsibility. The farm in which they were housed had excellent facilities for the care and maintenance of the animals? health. So much so that I moved my own horse on site so I could ride him for training exercises. At all times on set we had experienced Wranglers and Animal health Authorities on hand and Vets to monitor the welfare of the Animals working for the film. It has been my experience working for this film company that they take every conceivable precaution and employ the very best practitioners in every department and that includes the animal department.

I feel that there is a certain amount of personal vindictiveness levelled at the production from individuals with their own agenda. As is often the case in these situations, organisations will leap at the chance to gain publicity for their cause without seeking the truth. Being an experienced horseman and having worked as a wrangler and rider in the past, I would not have allowed myself to be a part of any production that knowingly employed unsafe practice in the workplace in this way. I can say with absolute certainty the production went out of their way to treat animals with the upmost respect and care.?
 

tmande2nd

New member
Oct 20, 2010
602
0
0
Its fucking NEW ZEALAND.

Hello people its a land of hills and such.
Besides animals are not that robust even a single trip can damage a horse beyond repair.

But again its PETA doing this.
 

Berithil

Maintenence Man of the Universe
Mar 19, 2009
1,600
0
0
Umm... Shouldn't PETA be glad about this? You know, so those poor, little animals no longer have to suffer under their abusive owners? Right?

Oh, wait, I forgot. PETA is absolute bonkers. Their so insane, they can't even support their own agenda.

Is it bad that I kinda want them to protest at our local theater? (They won't, 'cause our town's much too small and insignificant, but still... it would be entertaining)
 

Jandau

Smug Platypus
Dec 19, 2008
5,034
0
0
One day a Warg falls into a sinkhole, the other day a Giant Eagle lands in a mudtrap, then a Wyvern falls asleep and rolls off a cliff. Shit happens...