Yahtzee-Do you take him seriously?

Recommended Videos

RedxDecember

New member
Jun 25, 2008
387
0
0
Lolno.
It's satire. Only a fucking idiot would take it seriously.

Oh yeah, and I find every video I've ever seen of him beyond annoying.
I don't see the appeal. I'm sure filming a hobo on meth and paying him to "review" something he has no interest or knowledge about is just as, or even more entertaining than Yahtzee.
 

Dfskelleton

New member
Apr 6, 2010
2,851
0
0
Sometimes he's right, but I disagree sometimes. I take his oppinion the same as any other reviewers, it's just that he's funnier than them.
 

J-Dude

New member
Dec 16, 2009
8
0
0
Yahtzee has a lot of problems as a reviewer, the first and largest being the lengths he goes to to put everything bad about a game up-front and almost NEVER mentions what's good about a game, even if he thinks the game's good parts outweighs it's bad ones. I can't say how many times I've listened through a patently negative review only to hear him finally say, "but overall, I like <insert-game-here>, it's this, it's that, so count this as a recommendation", and think to myself, "Wait, WHY is it good? That has to be the worst endorsement I've ever heard!"

In fact, Yahtzee is the only guy I tend to get reviews of most games from, so I never even CONSIDERED playing the excellent Mass Effect games until realizing Bioware was only JUST beaten by Valve in that Developers competition. Let me tell you, while his criticisms were accurate, they were footnotes compared to the creative and narrative masterpiece I got to experience.

Oh, and of course Yahtzee's intense prejudice concerning the Wii.

I don't really play the Wii often aside from the first-party Mario stuff, but even so I know how necessary the Wii and Nintendo are to keeping the gaming scene anchored. Whether Yahtzee likes motion controls or not, he needs acknowledge that Nintendo is THE only console-making game company out there that's a GAME company, and not a gaming arm of a giant multinational mega-corporation like Sony or Microsoft are. Nintendo knows the stakes, they know how to keep the industry thriving, even if they've wasted a lot of shelf-space on shovelware despite being the #1 selling console in the console-slaughter that is the current gaming-scene.

Yahtzee puts a lot of value on new IP's and is probably disappointed that Nintendo does tend to crush other newer Wii games by continually releasing new Mario content along with all the other Nintendo classics. But at least Nintendo acts like they're making stuff intended for kids and have a major mascot. It's unrealistic to want to squeeze Mario out of things when he's basically gaming's Mickey Mouse.

As MovieBob has said, video games are TOYS, and they're core audience must be the YOUNG. Microsoft and Sony are on the road to destroying this industry the same way comic books imploded in the early 90's, by only making stuff for all the 17-35 year olds and leaving the next generation in the dust. By catering only to an inevitably shrinking number of older fans WITHOUT seeking out NEW ones, the industry will quite literally suck it's own DICK, into an oblivion of the sort the comic book industry has YET to recover from. Sony and Microsoft, this one is on YOU.

Nature abhors a vaccuum; it's is not natural, nor is it good business, for 80 - 90 percent of an entire consumer-base, namely kids, to be spoke for by only one company, who happens to be your chief competitor!

Yahtzee isn't helping either. Whether he realizes it or not, his words carry as heavy a weight as as there can be, and when he dismisses Nintendo, the Wii and the old-school Nintendo titles as he does, he reinforces a stupid notion in lots of his followers, that games for kids and games set in a non-realistic style, aren't worth anything, and that Nintendo is the enemy, holding us back. Now, I don't think this is what he really MEANS, but he sure doesn't elaborate on it very well.

Yes Yahtzee, I love IP's too, and yes, I'm not big on motion control either, but God Damnit, Nintendo is the last pure game-makers out there. Sega is gone, so is Atari. And the day this industry becomes prohibitively unprofitable, Sony and Microsoft will pull their entire divisions, because they can, because gaming is only one thing they do, not the ONLY thing. Nintendo will then be the last and only game in town, who can and WILL sustain and rebuild the industry on their own. Because in the video game...er...GAME, there can be no substitutes for the real deal.
 

phant0md

New member
Dec 16, 2009
2
0
0
yahtzee is like marmite you either love him or you hate him, and hats off to the guy because he is one of probably only a handful of people that could make most smear their members with branston pickle and waggle them around like a hyped up teen on a red bull high :)


As for his reviews they wouldnt sway me into NOT buying the game but its nice to hear a different side for once!
 

Thumper17

New member
May 29, 2009
414
0
0
I take it into consideration, perhaps more then I should. But he's not the only thing I look at when buying games, though I agree with him most of the time and that's why I don't have too many of the games on his list. Although I went out and bought Scribblenauts despite his bashing of it. I enjoyed it.
 

Ambient

New member
Nov 19, 2009
110
0
0
Not really. If I did, I wouldn't have bought Bioshock (a game I like so much I would by it five times over ) after hearing his review of it.
 

Proteus214

Game Developer
Jul 31, 2009
2,270
0
0
I take his reviews of games themselves with a grain of salt, but I find that his criticisms of the industry in general are much more valid.
 

Assassin Xaero

New member
Jul 23, 2008
5,392
0
0
Not always... he even said in one of his first reviews that if he doesn't say bad things about a game people whine and complain.
 

bsaxagent

New member
Sep 27, 2009
11
0
0
I take him in as a consideration.

But it's like reading newspaper reviews of movies and basing whether you should see the movie or not. You won't know until you see it/buy it. I do agree with him a lot, but I'm a very picky person as well, so I don't play games unless they are really really good.
 

pumasuit

New member
Aug 7, 2009
79
0
0
The man is a critic, not merely a video game reviewer. He's there to entertain, inform, and analyze. At the end of his critique, he's not there to tell you to buy it or not buy it - he's there to help you understand the product's contribution to the industry.
Yes, I take him very seriously.
 

Cornugon

New member
Sep 15, 2009
17
0
0
Most of the time he is right about the flaws of the games he "reviews", nevertheless he overlooks the good parts of a game far too often. Many games I like, he seems to detest, because of his inadequecy to overlook the flaws in it.

I've never bought a game fully based on his opinion however (possibly with the exception of Saints Row 2), so most of the time I only watch Zero Punctuation for the laughs. I also rarely watch his "reviews" of games I intend to buy, in fear of spoilers. So I guess his opinions have no no hold over me.

I do agree with him that JRPGs may burn in hell, but on the other hand I also think Half-Life 2 was only OK. Nothing spectacular.
 

TheRundownRabbit

Wicked Prolapse
Aug 27, 2009
3,826
0
0
I said it once and I'll say it again. An acurate review of a game comes from a worldly perspective, not a personal one, especially about minor details. So no, I dont take him seriously, if I did the only game I would have would be Saints Row 2
 

LivingInStereo

New member
Dec 22, 2008
112
0
0
He's never prevented me from buying a game, but if he says one is AMAZING (you all know what I'm talking about) I might look into it. That said, I've only been what could be considered a "gamer" since late gamecube era, so it's more of a recommendation on titles that I missed because I was too young to realize they existed.
 

Pyode

New member
Jul 1, 2009
567
0
0
dancinginfernal said:
You shouldn't take his reviews seriously, since they aren't reviews. They're more critiques if anything. With humor mixed in.
SirDerick said:
He's more of a critic than a reviewer.
Critics concentrate on the bad and tell us why it went wrong while reviewers simply tell us a bit of everything.
Um... critiquing is the same as reviewing. That's why reviewers are called critics... because they critique. Critiquing does not just mean saying what is bad, it means telling what is good and bad in an effort to make future iterations better.

Reviewing is essentially the same thing only more focused on the consumer and whether or not the product is worth their time and money.

Yahtzee does both of these things as well as a nice helping of humor.

So, in regards to the OT, yes I take him seriously. That doesn't mean I always agree with him or that his opinion is the deciding factor in whether or not I get a game. It just means that I respect his opinion and take it into consideration when I am thinking about purchasing a game.
 

Guffe

New member
Jul 12, 2009
5,106
0
0
I think that if you look/listen to his videos and later read his extra punctuation (and it has something to do about the game) you get a pretty good idea of what he thinks and what the game is about but it is a matter of taste after all...
 

disneyprincess

New member
Jul 3, 2010
10
0
0
Ha! The idea of Yahtzee as 'serious' is absurd! He's hilarious and awesome, but he is far from serious. When I am looking for a game to kill some time or something to tempt my husband from his brain draining pharmacy studies, I'll watch his reviews to get a general idea of how hideous a game might be, but he's a deliberately harsh critic because that's what we fans want see and it's hard to make positive things funny. So do I take Yahtzee seriously? In short- no; in long- noooooooooooooooooooooooo.