You have been forced to nuke a country.

Recommended Videos

Giest4life

The Saucepan Man
Feb 13, 2010
1,554
0
0
I'd do the Saudi Arab. They are way, way too much baggage and their miasmic influence over the world needs to be broken.
 

thelonewolf266

New member
Nov 18, 2010
708
0
0
fenrizz said:
Scotland.

Not a hard choice, and I even get to be celebrated as a hero for saving the world.
Square Go ya big ninny and other words to that effect.What have we ever done to you.
Anywho I'd nuke North Korea because if somebody doesn't they are probably going to start WW3 anyway.
 

Doomsday11

New member
Apr 15, 2010
241
0
0
Iran there basically evil and I would be saving the world a whole load of hassle for when they next decide to have a go at either Israeli or the west in general.
 

fraszoid

New member
Oct 26, 2010
17
0
0
Vatican City, its a country and I'm pretty sure Italy has no nuclear retaliatory capability.
 

The Last Gaijin

New member
Feb 9, 2011
31
0
0
fraszoid said:
Vatican City, its a country and I'm pretty sure Italy has no nuclear retaliatory capability.
I'd go with this one, least number of people living there. Sorry Catholics!
 

Draitheryn

New member
Jan 20, 2010
125
0
0
Korak the Mad said:
North Korea

That place is just evil, and crazy, and is being run by an insane evil person. I just know that if a nuclear war ever starts, they're probably the ones who started it.
If nuclear war ever starts, it is more likely to be initiated by the U.S in their paranoia of another country starting nuclear war.
That being said however, if the stipulations are nuke a country I would just nuke a place already barren of life, if its to nuke the entire country so its off the face of the earth, I would have to agree, North Korea.
 

Heartcafe

New member
Feb 28, 2011
308
0
0
Let the world be destroyed.
If I nuke one nation, it would kill the world anyways due to the radiation. So I rather be killed quickly, then slowly.
 

Sean Hollyman

New member
Jun 24, 2011
5,175
0
0
CrashBang said:
Technically it's not a country but it sure as well thinks of itself as one so Wales. I went to uni there and loved it but apart from that small seaside town, Wales is a dank, dirty shithole. Every inch of it. I've got a lot of friends there so I'll get them all to safety in England or the sea first and then happily nuke Wales.
Oh thanks I'm Welsh.

And we are a country.
 

Allevil

New member
Nov 11, 2009
35
0
0
Australia. Russia maybe. Aim it somewhere in the desert or siberia. One nuke isnt going to do much.
 

StBishop

New member
Sep 22, 2009
3,251
0
0
Wherever will have the least nagative impact to human lives and the environment in general.

eg, least number of lives lost/affected, but without annihilating some random flightless bird that only on one island in the world (like a kiwi or penguin which isn't found elsewhere).

inb4 Kiwi's being on both islands of New Zealand.
 

twistedmic

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 8, 2009
2,542
210
68
I'd go for Mexico and hopefully burn out a good deal of the rampant corruption that plagues the country. And after the nuking, America can send down troops to help stabilize the situation and bring in aide to the people who truly need it.
 

Sizzle Montyjing

Pronouns - Slam/Slammed/Slammin'
Apr 5, 2011
2,213
0
0
Heartcafe said:
Let the world be destroyed.
If I nuke one nation, it would kill the world anyways due to the radiation. So I rather be killed quickly, then slowly.
Nukes have been tested and i'm still here.
Pretty sure 1 nuke won't kill everyone.
CrashBang said:
Technically it's not a country but it sure as well thinks of itself as one so Wales. I went to uni there and loved it but apart from that small seaside town, Wales is a dank, dirty shithole. Every inch of it. I've got a lot of friends there so I'll get them all to safety in England or the sea first and then happily nuke Wales.
What's with the hate for wales!?