You have been forced to nuke a country.

[Airsoftslayer93]

Somewhere with a very small population, andorra perhaps.

 

[Phenakist]

The Vatican, or Luxemburg (probably not spelt right). Preferably the Vatican though, might kill off some catholic bigotry, I mean surely if they are as important as they think they are God would save them... Some minor cultural loss perhaps, as far as art etc. goes but as far as "acceptable losses" go, I could live with myself. Just you know, give me a small nuke, wouldn't want to damage the Colosseum or anything with actual historical significance in Rome.

 

[lonely tylenol]

Probably Spain... they don't seem very military strong.

Spain has the [a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_World_Heritage_Sites_by_country"]second highest[/a] concentration of UNESCO world heritage sites after Italy, you [a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philistinism"]philistine![/a]

So did you knew that or are you secretly from Spain. Just to be annoying right ¬¬. Oh no, sorry, just to be "clever".

 

[Shadow-Phoenix]

I wouldn't nuke any other country i would let the world seek it's destruction on equal terms.

 

[Estelindis]

Somewhere with a very small population, andorra perhaps.

The problem with any of these little landlocked sovereign states is that fallout would inevitably affect lots of people in the surrounding countries.

 

[Wintermoot]

the Sahara.
very little people live there and it would thus minimize the damage.

or the USA to start Fallout.

 

[Lord_Nemesis]

Africa. I don't care where just anywhere in Africa.

 

[Victim of Progress]

Madagascar. Anyone that's played Pandemic knows why.

"President Madagascar, man in Brazil is coughing.
SHUT DOWN EVERYTHING"
OT: Probably Norway

 

[Alcamonic]

Vatican. Mostly because I want to see the worlds reaction.

I would also request for the nuke to be tiny so only the Vatican area is destroyed, and not a large part of Rome along with it.

 

[Airsoftslayer93]

Somewhere with a very small population, andorra perhaps.

The problem with any of these little landlocked sovereign states is that fallout would inevitably affect lots of people in the surrounding countries.

Whoa whoa whoa, nobody said anything about the fallout crossing borders, i assumed some sort of hight tech shield would surround the borders and stop that kind of thing.

 

[Lord_Nemesis]

Simples, anywhere not the UK. Scotland doesn't technically count as the UK though, so they're fair game... In fact, let's just go with Scotland. Once it's gone we can use the irradiated land to dump garbage there which, let's face it, will make it look a little more presentable.

Harsh m8, very harsh. It may INDEED be a shithole but its OUR shithole.

 

[DeltaEdge]

Canada, in the Tundra. In a spot where there are almost no people. Right at very very top I think so most of the bomb goes into the north pole but the bomb still technically touches Canada.

 

[Crazycat690]

Israel, holy land my ass, after that's gone then hopefully several world religions will be really weakened, you know, after a few houndred years.
USA, well it's a full of trigger happy rednecks, the few good apples wont save the rest if one redneck gets power, just look what GW Bush did. Also, it seems every time there's an economical depression, they are to blame.
North Korea, obvious reasons.

 

[Xanthious]

Gibraltar! The Gibraltaran people are known to marry goats and live in huts made out of discarded Hot Pocket wrappers. Plus they have a natural odor similar to that of a particularly unkempt baboon. The sinister nation of Gibraltar should be scoured from this Earth forthwith!

 

[Shotgunjack1880]

North Korea, most Middle Eastern countries, or most African countries. None of them really do anything to help the world out as a whole. Actually can I nuke all of them while were at it?

 

[Estelindis]

Whoa whoa whoa, nobody said anything about the fallout crossing borders, i assumed some sort of hight tech shield would surround the borders and stop that kind of thing.

I thought no one said anything because it didn't have to be said; it's kind of implicit. ;-) However, given that this is a thought experiment, I suppose what you describe could be perfectly possible in our imagined scenario.

 

[Korolev]

I would choose an area which would result in the least damage - both in terms of human life lost, environmental damage and economic/political damage - I would nuke an island in Micronesia.

Yes, it is despicable to nuke some of the poorest people on the planet, but the good news is that since the islands are fairly spread out, not many people would die.

 

[Android2137]

If it counts... I'd nuke Sealand. I figure that'd be the best option.

...Ninja'd...

If Sealand doesn't count, then North Korea... It'd be most unfortunate for all those innocent North Koreans and my South Korean family probably wouldn't forgive me, but the fact is that it's ruled by a crazy dictatorship dynasty and is a totalitarian government to the extreme. I'm surprised it's lasted as long as it has, so unless reunification seems like a very near possibility, I'm just ending their misery.