Ramin 123 said:
The ending of Assassins Creed 2 nearly destroyed the rest of the game for me...even though it didn't I absolutely love that game. I just couldn't believe that Ubisoft would actually think that ending would either make sense or be cool.
Not just that but let's not forget how Ubisoft go back on themselves with Assassins Creed 1, Lucy has no bloody finger.....OHHH WHEN DID THAT HAPPEN? Then she does in the 2nd one and then they finally decide that people don't need to lose their finger to become an Assassin...bloody hell.
Just to be a pedant. Lucy was actually only tucking her finger back as a signal to Desmond. She has five fingers the rest of the time.
Also, the ending isn't supposed to make sense on its own (though it makes a bit more sense if you pay attention to the lore) it's meant to build up the ongoing storyline. Those Who Came Before were mentioned in the first game, so it wasn't an asspull on Ubisoft's part.
Anyway, I'll stop now before I go off on a fanboy rant. I'll let you go back to disliking it. Each to their own and all that.