Since eSports are presumably watched by people of all ages and not just adults, like most other sports, I'm not particularly fond of this idea.
Dangerous? In what way is advertising porn dangerous? You think it's going to give some poor grandmother in the audience a heart attack? As for immorality, plenty of people think that homosexual relations or converting from [insert religion here] is immoral, however that doesn't mean the act should be banned unless they can be proven to cause harm.KingsGambit said:They shouldn't be allowed to advertise or promote these sites and having eCelebs endorsing them is immoral and dangerous. It's particularly important when minors could be among those watching or supporting these teams. I can't see it happening as most companies would prefer to avoid any association with sleaze.
Yes there is such a thing as a minor. Anyone under 18. That's the law and the socially accepted norm to boot. Just because your middle school had debauched hallways doesn't make it right or acceptable. It doesn't matter if people know about it or not, it is about keeping it out of the mainstream and out of the reach of minors.Artaneius said:I'm sorry but anyone past the age of 10 already knows of sex and porn. And boys and girls around that age already start watching it anyways. This isn't the "old days" anymore. Hell back in my middle school and high school, everyone was groping and making out all the time in the hallways. I started getting "interested" in girls when I was around 10-11. Honestly, in this day and age there is no such thing as a minor when it comes to this stuff.
It is dangerous for the following reasons: it sets a bad precedent and it popularises and endorses the site and by extension, porn in general.JoJo said:Dangerous? In what way is advertising porn dangerous? You think it's going to give some poor grandmother in the audience a heart attack? As for immorality, plenty of people think that homosexual relations or converting from [insert religion here] is immoral, however that doesn't mean the act should be banned unless they can be proven to cause harm.
On-topic, I don't really see the problem as long as it's tasteful and unintrusive, society really needs to get over sex. If you don't want to watch porn, just ignore the adverts like I do for perfume advert #64932.
Your evidence is simply a link to a google search? Wow you're clearly very informed on issue and have clearly taken an objective and purely scientific look at all the evidence and you are definitely not spouting complete unsubstantiated bullshit.KingsGambit said:What "plenty of people" think or don't think about homosexuality is irrelevant. Porn has been proven to cause harm [https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?#q=effects+of+porn], long lasting and short term, physiological and psychological, particularly for those addicted to it and to both individuals and larger society. There is no such thing as "tasteful" porn or advertising of it. The second word is "unobtrusive". Society has no issue with sex. Porn != sex and that's not the reason why porn is taboo and sleazy.
No, it's not evidence. It's a page of results you can read through to find it for yourself. I don't recall being given the job of teaching you. You have the opportunity to see for yourself; I gave you a helping hand to a list of links you can start with. A further tip as a courtesy, learn how dopamine works and what it does. It plays a large role in why porn is unhealthy. That's not the topic at hand tho, which is that of advertising it in a space in which minors are likely to see it.JazzJack2 said:Your evidence is simply a link to a google search? Wow you're clearly very informed on issue and have clearly taken an objective and purely scientific look at all the evidence and you are definitely not spouting complete unsubstantiated bullshit.KingsGambit said:What "plenty of people" think or don't think about homosexuality is irrelevant. Porn has been proven to cause harm [https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?#q=effects+of+porn], long lasting and short term, physiological and psychological, particularly for those addicted to it and to both individuals and larger society. There is no such thing as "tasteful" porn or advertising of it. The second word is "unobtrusive". Society has no issue with sex. Porn != sex and that's not the reason why porn is taboo and sleazy.
/sarcasm off
Actually, I think a porn site advertising it's wares so to speak is better than an alcohol or tobacco company advertising their fairly toxic substances which are addicting and prone to abuse which can result in death.Fappy said:It's the exact same thing as being sponsored by alcohol or tobacco companies. They've been advertising their restricted products to minors for eons.
It's incredibly presumptuous, if you'll pardon my saying, to say you're backed by 'society at large'. I don't think any of us is qualified to speak for society, and you should leave any assumptions like that out of a rational debate. Pet peeve of mine.KingsGambit said:I am very informed because I have already read the results of studies and essays. My view is objective and subjective both, it doesn't need to be purely scientific. I have an opinion backed up by evidence. Everything I said is substantiated by doctors, psychologists and health professionals as well as government and society at large.
To be fair, I saw ads for playboy and hustler when I was 10,12,13. They weren't on TV, but I did see them. And if you have access to Esports you also have access to the internet, and if you have access to the internet, you really only need to know how to use google and that "porn" is a word and you have an endless cache of explicit material at your fingertips anyway.Pink Gregory said:Depends on the kind of presence their *ahem* service would have.
Under 18s probably watch esports after all.
Ah I was wondering when that card would be played, yeah if you're going to make very big claims about something you should always give good evidence to base your claims off otherwise your opinion is nothing short of worthless to anybody else.KingsGambit said:I don't recall being given the job of teaching you. You have the opportunity to see for yourself
No you didn't you gave a link to a google search which willI gave you a helping hand to a list of links you can start with.
And yet not only do you seem incapable of repeating any of the content and evidence you've read from these studies, you are even incapable of linking said studies.I am very informed because I have already read the results of studies and essays.
I don't give a shit what the government or society thinks and if you actually knew anything about the matter you'd know the effects of porn (or media in general) is very unsure and hotly debated territory in psychology.My view is objective and subjective both, it doesn't need to be purely scientific. I have an opinion backed up by evidence. Everything I said is substantiated by doctors, psychologists and health professionals as well as government and society at large.
I'm not interested in changing your mind, nor am I obligated to. Firstly, the topic is about advertising, not porn itself. Second, nothing I linked to would satisfy you or change your mind. I believe you'd refuse to believe any of it because your mind is made up and thus choose to save my time. Thirdly, remember Morpheus's line, "No one can tell you what the Matrix is; you have to see it for yourself." Pretty much the same thing here.JazzJack2 said:Ah I was wondering when that card would be played, yeah if you're going to make very big claims about something you should always give good evidence to base your claims off otherwise your opinion is nothing short of worthless to anybody else.KingsGambit said:I don't recall being given the job of teaching you. You have the opportunity to see for yourself
No you didn't you gave a link to a google search which willI gave you a helping hand to a list of links you can start with.
A)Have the different results for different people
B)Have no quality control meaning the vast majority of the results will not be scientific and will be completely worthless
Give me conclusive scientific evidence for your claims please because giving someone a link and telling them to 'find it out for themselves' is utterly moronic. I mean if I told you that UFOs exist and then when you asked for evidence I just gave you a link to a google search and told to find out yourself you would call me a moron, no?
And yet not only do you seem incapable of repeating any of the content and evidence you've read from these studies, you are even incapable of linking said studies.I am very informed because I have already read the results of studies and essays.
I don't give a shit what the government or society thinks and if you actually knew anything about the matter you'd know the effects of porn (or media in general) is very unsure and hotly debated territory in psychology.My view is objective and subjective both, it doesn't need to be purely scientific. I have an opinion backed up by evidence. Everything I said is substantiated by doctors, psychologists and health professionals as well as government and society at large.
Youporn is legit. 'All porn is malware' hasn't been the case for about a decade.ObsidianJones said:They'll have to clean up the site I guess as every porn site is probably full of malware and so forth.
You and everyone who saw that CSI:Miami episode and thought it was real are certainly not any kind of majority.KingsGambit said:I have my opinion, shared by the majority (I say with confidence, excepting this site evidently)
I don't know what csi Miami is. Regarding my quote, read the post I was quoting before jumping to conclusions.Easton Dark said:You and everyone who saw that CSI:Miami episode and thought it was real are certainly not any kind of majority.
Not saying majority opinion makes things right, but don't be fooled into thinking you have that many allies. People who use the word "debauched" to describe school hallways are not common.
Just a joke about CSI:Miami.KingsGambit said:I don't know what csi Miami is. Regarding my quote, read the post I was quoting before jumping to conclusions.Easton Dark said:You and everyone who saw that CSI:Miami episode and thought it was real are certainly not any kind of majority.
Not saying majority opinion makes things right, but don't be fooled into thinking you have that many allies. People who use the word "debauched" to describe school hallways are not common.