Marcus Kehoe said:
this isnt my name said:
Marcus Kehoe said:
Though I'm not a Jehovah Witness I go to their churches a believe what they believe. I believe in what I learn and have never been happier with my region, but people really don't like Jehovah witnesses. Their the nicest people I know and follow the bible the closest then any other form of Christianity, but they cause a lot of flak if you mention their name. I want to stick up more for what I believe but I don't want to alienate people.
I dnt want to get into religious debate. But... Uh... Have you read the Bible ? like God seding bears to maul children for calling a guy bald. I find that funny, but if I took it seriously, it would be entirely different. Or Moses and the angel of deth killing firstborns who did fuck all to anyone
Their are a lot of things in the bible I don't quite get either, but I am making my way throughout he bible and trying to make sense of some of those weird things. A big thing about studying with Jehovah witnesses is that they know that you need to ask questions, and sometimes just believing isn't enough. Not to be a dick either, but Their have been a lot of stories and scriptures altered in the bible since it was originally written. The king James Bible is the biggest one I know of, Its been altered in very big ways from a lot of the original scriptures and contradicts itself a lot.
It should be understood that the significance of things (such as rape, execution, certain punishments, etc.) for different cultures was entirely dependent on that cultures perception of how things should be.
Lets take how rape has been defined in past centuries. Ancient Greece for instance (and in fact not too long ago), rape wasn't so much considered as the unlawful forcing of yourself onto another person sexually, but rather the taking of something you do not have the right or authority to take. Such as the "rape" of Persephone, when Hades takes Persephone down into the underworld to have her marry him, he didn't actually have sex with her, but instead took her away without permission by Persephone's mother, Demeter.
Same as the "rape" of Helen, when Paris of Troy was invited into King Menelaus's home and unlawfully took Helen, Menelaus's wife, for himself and took her with him to Troy, causing the Trojan war.
The definition of and significance of rape has only changed within the pass couple of centuries, where before Dukes were allowed to lay with a woman right before she was married, because they had the AUTHORITY to do so. And more recently, a husband forcing himself onto his wife, even against her will, wasn't considered rape because she consented to marry him in the first place.
I'm just going to conclude with saying that Definitions and perceptions of terminology have altered with time, and being that the bible is fairly old (as well as being re-translated over centuries), it should be understood how certain actions and whatnot held different meaning and significance to different cultures involved in the bible.