That was bloody painful to watch, why was there like against 3 and 1 for videogames? Unfair wankers.Penguinness said:
That was bloody painful to watch, why was there like against 3 and 1 for videogames? Unfair wankers.Penguinness said:
Shit take this bloody flamethrower and let's go BURN THOSE FUCKERS!!!UndeadGamerNinja187 said:I shall share with you my thoughts.dathwampeer said:Oh God... I've never seen that before. Why did you link that? I now must find fire and clense my mind.DividedUnity said:This is rage at its finest.
AAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!!
Also. BURN THEM ALL.
Hehe as for the annotations, it's the best video of it I could find. There was a normal one but it got taken down. I agree they are also annoying at times because he also doesn't know what he's talking about. Even more annoyance eh?The_Logician19 said:Honestly? This...this thread actually pisses me off a little. I watched the video, and while it isn't a pillar of intellectualism and thought, it doesn't seem that bad. You've got two people who say, "See, my understanding is that this is making our people violent; can we talk about that?"; maybe I'm reading too much into it, but they only seemed to be listening to the guy who was telling them they were wrong. What's more, the detractor seemed to be portrayed as crazy; I very much doubt that was done on accident. All in all, it seems to be in favor of an open-minded mindset, and encouraging actually thinking about what you've been told. And the guy on our side? He seemed to win. He had solid arguments and spent the most time talking; the blond woman's argument was "Games are violent! Violence is bad!" and the third guy didn't even make an argument, he just pointed at her and said, "Uhh, for the purposes of argument, can you prove she's full of shit?" Which he does.
What's more, whoever made the captions for the video is a moron. Would you let your child watch Saving Private Ryan? Would you let your child watch Akira? Would you let your child watch Inglorious Basterds? No, because they're not for children. That doesn't mean that they're bad, just that they can be traumatizing if you aren't prepared for them. What's more, he seems to assume everyone is lying about...well everything, continuously calls people "retarded" and misspells "currupted". No, really, it's right at the beginning. And did you miss the part where he censors the guy? Did you all miss that? A detraction video like this makes people like that blond woman look right. That's not what we want.
So...maybe you all have no priorities. Or I'm completely missing the point; is the stupid person narrating what everyone's pissed off about?
Apologies Abound
An aside, an aside: I thought the average age for gamers was mid 20's-30's. If it wasn't, why would all these violent games be being made in the first place?
Meh, when I was 8 I watched Full Metal Jacket. You know the boot camp scene? I saw it and I neither started to swear like an old sea dog nor did I want to kill anyone.The_Logician19 said:Would you let your child watch Saving Private Ryan? Would you let your child watch Akira? Would you let your child watch Inglorious Basterds? No, because they're not for children. That doesn't mean that they're bad, just that they can be traumatizing if you aren't prepared for them.
Well, what about the video makes you foam at the mouth? The only gamers I can imagine actually getting angry over someone sucessfully defending video games is someone I would compare to a hyper-feminist or PETA: the sort of person who would be angry that all three people weren't declaring the saintly aspects of games, and that Halo wasn't mentioned.Penguinness said:Hehe as for the annotations, it's the best video of it I could find. There was a normal one but it got taken down. I agree they are also annoying at times because he also doesn't know what he's talking about. Even more annoyance eh?The_Logician19 said:Honestly? This...this thread actually pisses me off a little. I watched the video, and while it isn't a pillar of intellectualism and thought, it doesn't seem that bad. You've got two people who say, "See, my understanding is that this is making our people violent; can we talk about that?"; maybe I'm reading too much into it, but they only seemed to be listening to the guy who was telling them they were wrong. What's more, the detractor seemed to be portrayed as crazy; I very much doubt that was done on accident. All in all, it seems to be in favor of an open-minded mindset, and encouraging actually thinking about what you've been told. And the guy on our side? He seemed to win. He had solid arguments and spent the most time talking; the blond woman's argument was "Games are violent! Violence is bad!" and the third guy didn't even make an argument, he just pointed at her and said, "Uhh, for the purposes of argument, can you prove she's full of shit?" Which he does.
What's more, whoever made the captions for the video is a moron. Would you let your child watch Saving Private Ryan? Would you let your child watch Akira? Would you let your child watch Inglorious Basterds? No, because they're not for children. That doesn't mean that they're bad, just that they can be traumatizing if you aren't prepared for them. What's more, he seems to assume everyone is lying about...well everything, continuously calls people "retarded" and misspells "currupted". No, really, it's right at the beginning. And did you miss the part where he censors the guy? Did you all miss that? A detraction video like this makes people like that blond woman look right. That's not what we want.
So...maybe you all have no priorities. Or I'm completely missing the point; is the stupid person narrating what everyone's pissed off about?
Apologies Abound
An aside, an aside: I thought the average age for gamers was mid 20's-30's. If it wasn't, why would all these violent games be being made in the first place?
Suprisingly I was taught that the average gamer age was infact 32,33 or 35. Can't quite remember.
I never meant to say it would, but would you let your children watch it? I wouldn't.Quaxar said:Meh, when I was 8 I watched Full Metal Jacket. You know the boot camp scene? I saw it and I neither started to swear like an old sea dog nor did I want to kill anyone.The_Logician19 said:Would you let your child watch Saving Private Ryan? Would you let your child watch Akira? Would you let your child watch Inglorious Basterds? No, because they're not for children. That doesn't mean that they're bad, just that they can be traumatizing if you aren't prepared for them.
Anyway, OP's video made me smash my head against the table. Owch...
Good...gods... Though I kinda dig at least one of those girls *cough* yeeeaaaah... But damn they're annoying like that.DividedUnity said:This is rage at its finest.
Well first and foremost Alan Titchmarsh messes up straight away with the games 'Call of Duty 2' and 'Modern Warfare' and the whole setting just clearly comes across as it being a show for the middle-aged who don't game. It's then stupid comment atfer stupid comment. The woman puts forward a fact which doesn't seem very factual and the defender of games brings out another fact, and is boo'ed by the crowd. Very rage-worthy material.The_Logician19 said:Well, what about the video makes you foam at the mouth?
I lasted 10 seconds of that horrible sound. I now need to clean the blood out of my new headset.UndeadGamerNinja187 said:I shall share with you my thoughts.dathwampeer said:Oh God... I've never seen that before. Why did you link that? I now must find fire and clense my mind.DividedUnity said:This is rage at its finest.
AAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!!
Also. BURN THEM ALL.
GGHHHHNNNNN. NNNNNGGGGG! MUST BOMB JAPAN AGAIN.DividedUnity said:This is rage at its finest.
huh? it comes out end of this year or start of next year... 0.opantsoffdanceoff said:My rage is Guild Wars 2... it will never come.
I'm pretty sure it's in Austrailia and not japanSlowShootinPete said:An American study? It wasn't, like, anybody in particular, America in general ran a research study on 130,000 gamers. Citations, please?
I wonder what they all would think of this. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmwB-yz7PxM]
http://www.zombietime.com/fraud/ambulance/
http://www.zombietime.com/fraud/ambulance/hrw/
These articles made me rage like you would not believe. I really loved the part where the author describes exactly what kind of missile it would have taken to produce the damage shown in the photos.
GGHHHHNNNNN. NNNNNGGGGG! MUST BOMB JAPAN AGAIN.DividedUnity said:This is rage at its finest.
You've got to root weeaboos out at the source.DividedUnity said:I'm pretty sure it's in Austrailia and not japan
But they've been saying at the end of the year since when? 2008?Korten12 said:huh? it comes out end of this year or start of next year... 0.opantsoffdanceoff said:My rage is Guild Wars 2... it will never come.
well it was only last year they released a trailer. alot of info has been released.pantsoffdanceoff said:But they've been saying at the end of the year since when? 2008?Korten12 said:huh? it comes out end of this year or start of next year... 0.opantsoffdanceoff said:My rage is Guild Wars 2... it will never come.
Good...gods... Though I kinda dig at least one of those girls *cough* yeeeaaaah... But damn they're annoying like that.[/quote]DividedUnity said:This is rage at its finest.