so you dislike boxing because it's violent?Vegosiux said:Yeah, sorry, no epiphany, I still disagree. Even after watching slow-motion (and I do a lot of that, because my job involves a lot of various sports and so-called-sports stuff), I still see nothing more than two people hitting each other until one is knocked out cold, and a crowd all but calling "FINISH HIM!". It's a display of violence in my eyes. (those things have their own painter tho)Treeinthewoods said:Boxing is not a sport? How the hell do you make the ridiculous logical leaps to arrive at a conclusion that silly? It's physically exhausting, competitive and requires a ridiculous amount of skill and smarts at the highest levels. My wife used to think it was just two people wailng away at each other until she started paying attention to slow motion replays and started to grasp the ridiculous precision and timing of top level boxers. It's one of the purest forms of sport in existence and is also a highly effective martial art to boot.
I don't have a problem if you see it as "one of the purest forms of sport in existence". I don't. Hope you have no problem with that.
because it really is but it's not just two people hitting each other, just like all martial arts it involves a lot of technique and precision that the untrained observer will not pick up on. Most highly successful boxers are also quite smart, which makes them good partners in an interview and increases popularity.