I love 'em. Rather, I love mine. I've never had a moment of regret about any of them, with around 20 hours, total, of work done (i.e. of actual time spent with the needle in my skin). I have very visible tattoos, in that if I'm wearing a t-shirt it's virtually impossible not to see them. The thing is, the world is becoming more and more open to the idea of tattoos as socially acceptable. There aren't a lot of people you'll ever see who cringe at the site of tattoos, though people still seem to hold some archaic belief that if you get one you'll automatically exempt yourself from ever getting a job. My mentor has full sleeves, a full chest piece and a full back piece, has been a teacher for, like 15 years, and has a wife and 2 kids. There is nothing wrong with getting tattoos, in theory.
On the other hand, I do have a lot of problems with what some people choose to get. There are 3 main types of people who get tattoos that I fundamentally believe should not be getting tattoos. At least of what they're getting. Firstly there are people who want a tattoo cliche: that is to say someone who has no conception of tattoos as any kind of expression of oneself an get: asian characters, tribal designs, skulls, armbands, chinese dragons or butterflies. These have a tendency to be people who like the idea of the tattoos as they were viewed ten to twenty years ago, and seem to still have the conception of a tattoo as an expression that one is somehow a badass. Secondly there is the person who just wants a tattoo with no real idea of what they want: have you ever heard, or perhaps asked yourself "I want a tattoo, but I don't know what to get?". This is a sign that you shouldn't get a tattoo... yet. My personal process for deciding on tattoos is extensive, and takes upwards of year. I have to come across an image which provides me with enough of a response to feel that I want that image tattooed. Then I have consider the tattoo for the next year to 4 years before I'll actually start saving to get it done. In the case of someone who doesn't know, they begin seeking out images to get done, which often leads to settling on something they aren't actually going to be all that happy with. Thirdly and lastly, the ironic tattoo: it's really easy pickings these days to take a jab at hipsters. They're everywhere and they function as a really easy target for all of everyone's hate about youth culture, in general. Frankly, I know a lot of hipsters and I've been called one myself, and they can be very nice people. On the other hand, I do have a problem with the ironic tattoo. Getting a tattoo that is, in actual fact, a joke about something isn't clever. It's something that will get old to the tattoo's bearer extremely fast and cease to be a relevant entity even faster. I've seen people get things from rage faces to my little pony characters, to Neil Patrick Harris' face, and few to none of those things will continue to be relevant to that person in the forseeable future.
I am kind of a douche about these things, though, so please forgive my partisan opinions on the matter.
dex-dex said:
I laughed very hard at your photo. very funny and pretty accurate.
my only question is that the grey area on the rest of the guy, does that mean they can be there and won't make a statement?
I am all for tattoos but with anything too many is not a good thing.
such as this is too much in my opinion
I will admit that the guy in the photo that looks pretty cool
That guys lives in Montreal. I've met him. He's a character, that one. He could be perfectly nice, but I'm not keen on talking to him because
his face is a skull/i].