Saltyk said:
The idea that we could ever have a Utopian society is probably one of the worst concepts people ever came up with. It's not possible, stop wasting your breath on trying to accomplish it. Just try for a just or happy society. Perfect is both impossible and boring.
spartan231490 said:
yeah, utopia isn't really possible. People are just too animal. I have some ideas that I think would get us a pretty good society, but they are too long to write out. It involves a pyramid-like government to limit the potential abuses of government, as well as to ensure that each individual has the maximum possible say in what happens in their life. It's based on a low-regulation capitalism system that regulates by giving incentives to good processes instead of by penalizing bad processes.
I have pages and pages on it, i'm thinking about writing something about it. a paper, or a small book or something.
Isn't that basically what the American government is supposed to be? Not to be rude or to troll you, but ideally the American government has various tiers of government (Federal, State, County, City) with checks and balances (Executive, Legislature, Justice) to prevent any one branch from growing too big or powerful and prevent corruption and abuse. We vote for people who we want to represent us in said government branches and levels. You can pretty much do anything as long as you don't hurt anyone. The reason we get tax breaks and subsidies is to encourage good behavior (like owning a home or growing food for others). And America is nothing if not capitalist. Remember our enemies keep calling us that as an insult or something (I wonder if they have any clue what it actually means).
You're not being rude or trolling, it's a legit question. In short, they sound alike, but they are fundamentally different. The main difference is that each tier of gov't can only affect interactions below the step beneath it. So, it would be like if the federal government was only allowed to regulate interstate commerce basically, and each state was only able to influence interactions between counties, and ect. There are other differences, but like I said, I want to avoid going into too much detail. And I would go a lot further than creating different branches of government. And we don't have as much power individually as I like because most decisions that influence us directly, are controlled by the federal or state government, which have a lot of voters. In my system, the gov't that would have the most influence over you is your town government.
And I would use similar systems to tax breaks and subsidies but take it much further, as well as removing many regulations and taxes on big business. They don't help as much as you think, because as long as you penalize bad behavior, people will find loopholes, if you only encourage good behavior, it's harder to get around. For example, instead of breaking apart monopolies and legislating against them, i would just give huge subsidies to companies that had a very very low percentage of market share.
I would, overall, be more lazze faire then the US with the economy, and very much more segmented with the government, and use something like a reinforced expanded bill of rights as well as checks and balances. if you're really interested, I could send you a message with the details in a few weeks once I have the chance to compile everything I have(I'm really busy for the next 2-3 weeks or more)
it obviously isn't perfect, no system is, and I don't even claim to be smart enough to come up with the best system all on my own, but I think it's the same basic format as the best possible government.
also, if your curious, it is heavily based on the philosophy of John Stuart Mills and the US government, I just expanded a few new steps based on his theories, and looked at what practices worked and how well the worked in the US(as well as which ones didn't and as near as I can figure why)
Whew, that was a bit of a wall of text wasn't it.