Your views on Underage Sex?

Recommended Videos

Greenstripe0

New member
Apr 2, 2010
51
0
0
TestECull said:
If their bodies have matured enough for it, and they're using some sort of contraceptive in an effective manner, then I don't care if they bone themselves silly.


If they're missing either piece of the recipe however, they shouldn't do it.
Pretty much this is my general opinion. Also, one more little addition, they should be within at least a year of the same age. Why? I don't know. Part of me finds it intensely creepy at more than that. I'm not going to try and defend that it's just something that really...well I find bizarre.
 

LostNightRecon

New member
Apr 28, 2009
25
0
0
Okay so long as they are being told its taboo, Then Kids will be kids its like the oven. You tell them its hot and not to touch it. But they do anyways. Once they are burned they know better. If we as humans are told not to do something then we will do it its human nature. If we would stop telling out kids that sex is bad an teach them properly and not just by the school it has to come from the parents as well as the school can only go so far. We shall see a drop in the conditions however as long as we keep this idea that sex is bad and train the youth in that regard its only going to run more rampant. Not to mention all the hormones in our food and water. I mean we have people being mature in their early teens now adays. We fill our meat with them so they grow faster it does the same thing down the line once we eat it.
 

LostNightRecon

New member
Apr 28, 2009
25
0
0
Skullkid4187 said:
dickywebster said:
Skullkid4187 said:
dickywebster said:
Skullkid4187 said:
dickywebster said:
Depends on the person and the country, as for example Swedens age of consent is 15, while americas is 18
It varies from 16-18 depending on the state.
Thanks for saying as ive only heard a general 18 and something about state variation, but i wasnt sure enough to say. Mind you, doesnt that make things complicated in america?
Somewhat I live in Ohio and the age of consent law is 17. Indiana(Our neighboring State)has 16 as its age of consent. Say you(17) and your 16 year old girlfriend wanted to have sex. You both live in Ohio. SO the two of you drive to Indiana, and have sex and get caught, because you both legally live in Ohio you committed a crime and will be punished with pedophilia a minor form of it but still.
Ah ok then, so not as easy to get around as i thought, if its based upon where you live it might be harder to get around in theory, but how easy is it to enforce in reality? Ignoring actually catching them but say tracking them to where they live if they had skipped to a state with a lower age of consent?
Generally they buy hotel rooms(were you must be over 18 to rent a room) or have sex in a car, in a parking lot, usually police officers stroll by parking lots and if they catch you they have to arrest or call your parents.
Crossing state lines for sex is illegal in the US. As I'm in Indiana so if someone goes from Ohio to have lets just call it relations for now as its weird to see sex on a gaming forum used in serious context. If you cross state lines with a minor in your home state with the intention of having relations then you can be arrested and fined and possibly have it in your record as being a sex offender.
 

Harla

New member
Mar 8, 2010
25
0
0
I personally think that one of the biggest problems is that, in muhc of the so-called civilised world, we're stuck using physcial age as the line. Someone's age is never going to be a direct indivcation of wheher they are ready for it or not: People develop at different rates, both physically and mentally, and individual upbringing and environment has such a long-reaching impact on allthe relevant variables, that something like "age" becoems arbitrary and foolish.

I know 21 year olds who are defintiely not ready to be having sex yet, 28 year olds with 6 kids who shold be chemically stilled for hte benefit of society, and I'bve also known 13, 14 and 15 year olds who understood exactly what they were tlaking about, what they were wanting to do, why they wanted to do it, and were both aware of the risks and precautions, and able to explain to me calmly the situation and why they felt it was alright. I agreed with them, when all was said and done.

I feel as though there must be somethign beyond "age" that we can use to set the bar, since age alone is such an unreliable mesure. Heck, I'd even support coupling liscences, with no age limit, but with a general mental maturity and understanding test involved.

Me, I was barely 13... my choice, and while I may not have known as much as I know now, I'd done my research and knew what I needed to, simply because my own body's libido was driving me insane, already, by that point, and I needed it. Boy I went to was only a sort-of friend (as people 4 years above you can only be, when you're that age), who was 16-going-on-17 and I approached him becuase he was known to have experience. I could not have survived if I'd waited until the minimum age of consent here, and even if I'm an anomally in that my drive is unnaturally potent, I still think it's wrong that what I did should be classed as illegal.

-Harla
 

Rusman

New member
Aug 12, 2008
869
0
0
Been there done it, I lost my virginity at 15 to a girl I'd been seeing for about a year at the time. We'd talk about it for a couple of months, made sure we were both ok with it, very careful with protection and it went fine... well, however fine doing it for the first time can be.

So yeah, as long as both parties are sensible about it then I don't see a problem with it... as long as it's not crazy young, like under 8 or something creepy like that.
 

Lazier Than Thou

New member
Jun 27, 2009
424
0
0
I'm against it.

Let me state at the outset that I don't have any way of making children not have sex. I don't want government or any other intervention(except parental) to force kids to not have sex. I don't believe in chastity belts. I don't think that we should have a "sex monitor" follow kids around all day, every day to make sure they don't have sex. In fact, I think the system should largely stay in place that we have now(though I'd prefer a better sexual education for children, so they understand the biology and what contraceptives to use).

I don't believe that teenagers should have sex. Late teens, early teens, I think it's a bad idea. Heck, I'm generally against sex in the twenties, but it's less of an issue. Sex is a very dangerous thing to play around with. It can ruin your life and the lives of other people. Taking aside the issue of STDs, an unwanted pregnancy will effect your life for the rest of it. Abortion, adoption, keeping it, it doesn't matter which path you take, it's going to be a defining moment of your life. Not only that, but it'll occur at a time when society has not emotionally or mentally prepared you for such devastating possibilities.

If these children had some idea of the forces they were playing with, I might be more willing to allow it(that's why I'm more open to the idea of the twenties), but most people have no idea how sex will effect them. Even if there are no physical scars in the way of pregnancy or STD, sex is still very much an emotional thing. Yes, even for guys, though less so obviously. It's a bad idea to mess around with such things.

I believe it should be discouraged, at the very least.
 

Sparcrypt

New member
Oct 17, 2007
267
0
0
I have no problems with kids having sex.. I have big problems with kids being pressured into having sex though.. and if you think that doesn't happen you're kidding yourself.

But if a 15 year old (or 14, 13, whatever) honestly feels that they want to have sex, have a like minded partner and do so safely then sure, why not?

Something like 50% of people who have sex before they're 18 do regret it though and it's not like kids these days are feeling anything different from what everyone else has been for the last million years when the hormones start going crazy, so there is some argument against it... but I still believe in educating them honestly about the risks, making sure it's a decision not to take lightly and then leaving them to make that decision.
 

Max David

New member
Mar 22, 2010
9
0
0
Believe me, it has been discussed many times and in the end just go with your feelings!
I'v been there and if people are in love they aren't going to listen to what is the sensible thing to do.

There will always be assholes taking advantage or sluts doing it to show off!

But use both condom and birth controle pills and if you think that, the relationship, will last past the time that was needed to get in her/his bed then alright.

Big difference here is education and parenting, Not the law.
 

TacticalAssassin1

Elite Member
May 29, 2009
1,059
0
41
This is the one topic that I actually agree with Australian laws on.
Sex from 10 up is fine, as long as it's with someone +-2 years of you age wise, all consenting.
Once you reach 16, it's fair game unless you're under their care (teacher, doctor etc). Once you are 18 you have full rights to do whatever.
I think that's pretty suitable.
 

Queen Michael

has read 4,010 manga books
Jun 9, 2009
10,400
0
0
The problem is that what's underage at some places isn't underage at other places. So if we're going by the lawbook I'd have to say that having sex with a fifteen-year-old girl is a crime against nature in the UK but not in Sweden.
 

TacticalAssassin1

Elite Member
May 29, 2009
1,059
0
41
Credossuck said:
TacticalAssassin1 said:
This is the one topic that I actually agree with Australian laws on.
Sex from 10 up is fine, as long as it's with someone +-2 years of you age wise, all consenting.
Once you reach 16, it's fair game unless you're under their care (teacher, doctor etc). Once you are 18 you have full rights to do whatever.
I think that's pretty suitable.
that is retarded.
Because it misses the vital part about educating the little shits about what they are doing.
Not considering pretty much every Australian public school gets free sex education.
And not bullshit 'Don't muck around, kids!' education. Unbiased 'If you wanna do shit, do it this way' stuff.
And it works.
 

MasterOfWorlds

New member
Oct 1, 2010
1,890
0
0
I personally believe that no one under the age of 16 is emotionally or intellectually ready for sex, and even then, the majority of 16 year olds probably aren't.

If they feel that they absolutely MUST do it though, there's really not going to be a whole lot of stopping them, and I think it's best to simply encourage that they're smart about it. Explain very carefully that, yes, giving/getting a blowjob can in fact spread STDs (as this seems to be among the most common things to do when people are younger) and I think you'd see underage sex in general decline because really, how many people just stop at a blowjob unless time is short?

Also, if someone's underage, they should never sleep with someone who's at or above the age of consent.
 

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,623
0
0
Not entirely sure the specifics here in Canada, but personally speaking..?

15-16 years old at the lowest, and the participants must be at a maximum of two years apart, and fully consenting with one another for the act to be legal. Beyond those requirements? Wear a condom, learn safe sexual practices, listen in school.. and I don't care what happens after that.
 

StormShaun

The Basement has been unleashed!
Feb 1, 2009
6,948
0
0
Im alright with it as long as its above 12 or 13, and also if the two are in truthfully in love.

But a three years radius above or below you age is the limit I find it.