Zero Punctuation: Gears of War 3

Recommended Videos

Mooninaut

New member
Jan 15, 2008
1
0
0
While I love the video as always, I found the unexpected and unprecedented appearance of actual punctuation at 03:19 shockingly dismaying, or possibly dismayingly shocking, or something.

Keep up the good^W work!
 

hendoben

New member
Nov 12, 2010
9
0
0
I've only played about two hours of GOW, the very first Gears, it was just so completely bland, bland dialogue, bland characters, bland game-play that I never felt even remotely compelled to return to it at any time. Easily one of the most overrated games of the last decade, the only reason it done so well is because of how it looked.

But then, i'm not much of an online shooter player, and i think this is where a lot of people have most fun with this game. Good luck to them.

Xbox really needs to start doing better with its exclusives heading into the next gen of consoles.
 

Havik223

New member
Nov 17, 2009
25
0
0
I'm a HUGE Gears of War fan, I bought the first one on PC and I got an Xbox just so I could play the second one. I can say without hyperbole Yahtzee is right on many accounts. The lambent were introduced in the second game, but it was minor and glazed over in one small part of a chapter. To anybody who has no vested interest in the universe they wouldn't have noticed or easily would have forgotten. The Gears games have not done a very good job of explaining anything to a normal person. I know what Anvil gate is, who Berni is, what lambency is and I know that because I read stuff on line, I bought a book, I had an interest in the universe and I did more research into it. A regular person wouldn't care enough to and as a result they're left with a story line that just seems bland and ordinary.

I remember playing with a friend of mine a few days ago and he asked me what was going on in the story line. I said "uuuuhhhhhhh" and I gave him some vague answers, because honestly this game's campaign was forgettable. It was full of rail shooters and filler sections. Nothing of real importance happens, it's just a series of roadblocks on Marcus's way to finding his dad. As I write this I'm trying to figure out why there was a section where the Gears went through a Locust base. I cannot for the life of me remember why and that's a perfect example of a poorly written story (or too much weed).
 

FallenMessiah88

So fucking thrilled to be here!
Jan 8, 2010
470
0
0
Personally I didn't like Gears Of War 3 that much either, though it really has nothing to do with any of the points that Yahtzee adressed. This was especially because of the ending. It just felt rushed, which is a shame because I was honestly curious to see what happens next, but I suppose that is reserved for Gears Of War 4...
 
Mar 26, 2008
3,429
0
0
JSRT said:
Ixal said:
rickicker said:
I think the entirety of Gears of Wars series runs on bayonet chainsaw vasectomy, because of the whole "HOLY SHIT BAYONET CHAINSAW VASECTOMY LOLOLOLOLOLZ!!" mentality of both the producers and the audience who bought them. It was only when they see the later games that comes after GoW that they go, "Hmm...you know, this 'plot' thing might not be such a bad idea after all!"

Well done, boys. Well done.
And sadly "BAYONET CHAINSAW VASECTOMY" now gets exported and ruins other games by dumbing them down go get that audience. Mass Effect 3 being the most recent example.
Thank you guys for ruining video games...
LOL! So now Gear is ruining games? WOW! Gotta love that hyperbole. Yeah lets blame other developers whose games have nothing to do with them for Bioware's fuck ups! While we are at it lets blame Epic for Final Fantasy 13 and 14 being such turds as well. Funny thing is while they talk about "dumbing something down" for a certain audience , Mass Effect was never a complex game in the first place.
I'm a Mass Effect fanboy and thoroughly agree with your last comment.
Plus anyone who's spent a decent amount of time with the Gears series knows that the chainsaw bayonet isn't an insta-win button. Try rushing a Theron with it on anything greater than hardcore and you'll be cut down by gun fire before you close half the distance. Either that or they'll just go around you.
 

internetzealot1

New member
Aug 11, 2009
1,693
0
0
Yahtzee, you were positive to Gears 2 to because it had excellent pacing. Gears 3 had even better pacing, so I guess fuck all for reviewer consistency.
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
internetzealot1 said:
Yahtzee, you were positive to Gears 2 to because it had excellent pacing. Gears 3 had even better pacing, so I guess fuck all for reviewer consistency.
Glad to see I'm not the only one who felt that this review was off, I kind of thought that he would like Gears 3 because he like Gears 2, guess I forgot who we were dealing with
 

Uncle_Brainhorn

New member
Dec 18, 2009
219
0
0
Before I saw this review, I wanted the game. After I saw this review, I bought the game and have been loving it so far.

And I know better than to take these reviews seriously, but this one wasn't funny so much as kind of whiny.

Also, I don't ever remember them saying anything about the planet being destroyed.
 

Cid Silverwing

Paladin of The Light
Jul 27, 2008
3,134
0
0
warrenEBB said:
first Zero Punc I've disagreed with.

Gears has a story and it has nuance. but it's hard to notice it between all the explosions and screaming.

You can say the story was badly delivered (and then delve into a critique of why/how the devs failed).

but it's pretty lame to admit you just weren't paying attention and couldn't follow the story (or remember names).

and it's even worse to claim there is no story (or characters).
ugh.
Absolutely not. If a storyteller makes you fall asleep as s/he's narrating, s/he's not making you feel invested in the aforementioned story. The audience is well justified in falling asleep if the story isn't compelling them to follow.
 

JSRT

New member
Oct 5, 2011
36
0
0
Programmed_For_Damage said:
JSRT said:
Ixal said:
rickicker said:
I think the entirety of Gears of Wars series runs on bayonet chainsaw vasectomy, because of the whole "HOLY SHIT BAYONET CHAINSAW VASECTOMY LOLOLOLOLOLZ!!" mentality of both the producers and the audience who bought them. It was only when they see the later games that comes after GoW that they go, "Hmm...you know, this 'plot' thing might not be such a bad idea after all!"

Well done, boys. Well done.
And sadly "BAYONET CHAINSAW VASECTOMY" now gets exported and ruins other games by dumbing them down go get that audience. Mass Effect 3 being the most recent example.
Thank you guys for ruining video games...
LOL! So now Gear is ruining games? WOW! Gotta love that hyperbole. Yeah lets blame other developers whose games have nothing to do with them for Bioware's fuck ups! While we are at it lets blame Epic for Final Fantasy 13 and 14 being such turds as well. Funny thing is while they talk about "dumbing something down" for a certain audience , Mass Effect was never a complex game in the first place.
I'm a Mass Effect fanboy and thoroughly agree with your last comment.
Plus anyone who's spent a decent amount of time with the Gears series knows that the chainsaw bayonet isn't an insta-win button. Try rushing a Theron with it on anything greater than hardcore and you'll be cut down by gun fire before you close half the distance. Either that or they'll just go around you.
Yeah i am a huge Mass Effect fan myself, can't wait for ME3. Also yeah just randomly rushing every enemy with a chainsaw in single and especially multi will get you taken down pretty quickly.
 

duchaked

New member
Dec 25, 2008
4,451
0
0
Resistance 3 as a model for Gears 3? ehhhh let's not go there

but man, does Yahtzee read IGN game reviews? can't help but get the feeling...
 

honshuwolf

New member
Oct 17, 2007
6
0
0
sravankb said:
1. The planet's gonna "explode". Don't know where he got that from.
He means the bomb that is going to kill everyone.

2. "Were the lambent introduced in the earlier games?" Yes, all the way back in Gears 1.
The Nu-Lambent was introduced at the end of GOW2 with no explanation and at the end of GOW3 there is still no explanation what it is.

The Lambent Wretches from GOW were just a different type of enemy that was never discussed.

3. "Was Anya there in the games before this one?" Again, back in GoW1.
I had to google this at first because he has a totally different look. Apparently he didnt bother to try to find out.

Yup, he's definitely qualified to criticize the story aspect of the game (of all the fucking things to talk about in a Gears game).
Because he is not a Gearhead like you are it doesnt mean that he cannot discuss this. And you are really falling into what he said fans were going to do.

Mind you, I did like Yahtzee's earlier reviews, where he actually knew what he's talking about, but his constant negativity is just getting stale at this point. His act of not liking anything is just plain boring now.

And yes, it is an act. Let's face that fact. No one who complains about games to this extent can also say that he likes them as an art form.
Oh yeah you did.

Anyway, you didnt really need to remember what happened in GOW 2 to follow this game at all since a lot of stuff was dropped and only the most basic things stayed.
 

honshuwolf

New member
Oct 17, 2007
6
0
0
internetzealot1 said:
Yahtzee, you were positive to Gears 2 to because it had excellent pacing. Gears 3 had even better pacing, so I guess fuck all for reviewer consistency.
The first two Gears had good stories of doom and actual endings, in Gears 3 you spend a chapter going to a grocery store to get supplies that goes nowhere because the ship blows up and no one told them to come back from the start of the attack for some reason.And then the several chapters of you looking for fuel for the sub that you never end up getting only to find fuel in the same dock where the sub is. Some one should have sent a scout team to see if the dock had all the stuff they needed from the start but that would have just cut the story down by a third.
 

Random7

New member
Feb 8, 2010
9
0
0
Wow, what a shitty review. Its like all he does now is just complain nonstop to please his fans. I'm not even sure he knew what he was talking about I doubt he even played the game ay this point if the plot confused him that much.
 

The Breadcrab

New member
Mar 20, 2011
171
0
0
Wow... this is honestly IMO the worst review Yahtzee has ever done. And yes, I absolutely love his older episodes; I just watched a few recently and laughed my polka-dotted trousers off.

All I can recount from this review is blabbering about mainstream shooters, a few recycled jokes that are not even that funny, and completely misused references to Freud. Does Yahtzee even know who he is? I'm not sure he even used any metaphors here, at least not good ones.

What happened, Yahtzee? You used to be my favorite critic ever, but now your reviews are getting seriously lackluster. Recent reviews like SotD, inFAMOUS 2, Zelda 3DS, etc didn't wow me either. The Resistance 3 review was especially disappointing. Oh, it's like Half-life 2. Brilliant. Any other joke you got? Step up your game, man. For your sake and ours.
 

The Breadcrab

New member
Mar 20, 2011
171
0
0
trollpwner said:
The Breadcrab said:
Wow... this is honestly IMO the worst review Yahtzee has ever done. And yes, I absolutely love his older episodes; I just watched a few recently and laughed my polka-dotted trousers off.

All I can recount from this review is blabbering about mainstream shooters, a few recycled jokes that are not even that funny, and completely misused references to Freud. Does Yahtzee even know who he is? I'm not sure he even used any metaphors here, at least not good ones.

What happened, Yahtzee? You used to be my favorite critic ever, but now your reviews are getting seriously lackluster. Recent reviews like SotD, inFAMOUS 2, Zelda 3DS, etc didn't wow me either. The Resistance 3 review was especially disappointing. Oh, it's like Half-life 2. Brilliant. Any other joke you got? Step up your game, man. For your sake and ours.
Ah. I always enjoy returning to controversial reviews about a month after they've been posted. You know why? There's always one person making a heart-felt, venomous speech that they've spent about a week nicely wording. An attack on someone who doesn't care, that nobody's going to read, all because you can't accept *gasp* someone else having a different opinion that you can ignore if you dislike. Thanks man, this made my day.
Why, you're welcome. Wish I could say the same for your comment, but then again you did completely miss the point of my argument, so no worries.
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
trollpwner said:
The Breadcrab said:
Wow... this is honestly IMO the worst review Yahtzee has ever done. And yes, I absolutely love his older episodes; I just watched a few recently and laughed my polka-dotted trousers off.

All I can recount from this review is blabbering about mainstream shooters, a few recycled jokes that are not even that funny, and completely misused references to Freud. Does Yahtzee even know who he is? I'm not sure he even used any metaphors here, at least not good ones.

What happened, Yahtzee? You used to be my favorite critic ever, but now your reviews are getting seriously lackluster. Recent reviews like SotD, inFAMOUS 2, Zelda 3DS, etc didn't wow me either. The Resistance 3 review was especially disappointing. Oh, it's like Half-life 2. Brilliant. Any other joke you got? Step up your game, man. For your sake and ours.
Ah. I always enjoy returning to controversial reviews about a month after they've been posted. You know why? There's always one person making a heart-felt, venomous speech that they've spent about a week nicely wording. An attack on someone who doesn't care, that nobody's going to read, all because you can't accept *gasp* someone else having a different opinion that you can ignore if you dislike. Thanks man, this made my day.
No one is going to read this...says the guy who just wrote half a paragraph about it.