I think I'll wait for a "Game of the Year" version or a "Mass Effect Collection". That is, if that is ever gonna happen.
Besides, there are good arguments on both sides of the debate and to simply dismiss every single one of them as "cheeto-laden man-children" is not only in poor taste, it's just simply untrue.
Just because Yahtzee has his own internet show doesn't mean that his opinion is worth more than anyone else's. As long as you can express your opinion in a civilised, well thought out manner, I don't really see what the problem is. I mean, isn't that exactly what Yahtzee has done? So what makes him so different from everyone else, except for the fact that he's famous.Invadergray said:Yahtzee is a more valid authority on games than any cheeto-laden forum goer on this site. So if he says it could have been worse and maybe people are overreacting, I'm more inclined to believe that than some frothing man-child shouting "Aye wash lied two! DA nartive wash epic falez. Shivilishashun will nao collapse." He's not a bad journalist, he didn't overlook anything "all-important," and if you think you think you're disappointed because of his journalistic process which hasn't changed since 2009, it may just be possible that you're only upset he didn't take YOUR side. He took the middle ground, didn't address the controversy for more than a couple sentences. That's perfectly reasonable. This isn't in response to any comment in particular, more a pre-empt on all the ones sure to come. Don't hate on Yahtzee for this. Feel free to hate on me though, I'm really biased.
Besides, there are good arguments on both sides of the debate and to simply dismiss every single one of them as "cheeto-laden man-children" is not only in poor taste, it's just simply untrue.