I hope you're happy, because I can't read three posts in these comments without running into a picture of an Emolga.Onyx Oblivion said:
The bane of Yahtzee's existence.
Actually I think you would be shocked by the taste of Pikachu. To be honest though, I think it may actually taste quite good. Mice are small agile creatures and that means they need to have tender meat... not that I have ever eaten a mouse... or a Pikachu...Maclennan said:Heres the question he missed, what do the people in that world eat since every animal and most of the damn plants are pokemon?
I think a miltank would be quite tasty. Pikachu would probably be kind of stringy. They will probably resort to "iceberg lebtuce" soon.
Also...it took him 3 times to beat N?Loop Stricken said:Yeah but she had TWO of the little bastards! And they switched out every time they used whateverthefuck move it is she has.Onyx Oblivion said:You got your game strategy thrown off by EMOLGA enough to complain about it? Pokemon wasn't EASY enough for you that a Gym Leader you COULDN'T sweep with one move is a negative point against it?
The bane of Yahtzee's existence.
I like how he complained that a function of a Japanese game works better in Japan. That's just crazy.Orwellian37 said:I like how he complained about the effects that YOU CAN TURN OFF. I still like the games though.
Civ 4 would like a word with youAce IV said:Seriously, bro, Pokemon has probably the most complicated mechanics of any turn-based game ever. Like, seriously, so many secret stats, random variables, it's ridiculous. And Yu-gi-oh has a pretty damn near-indecipherable rule-set.wc alligator said:Yu-Gi-Oh! has tier lists too. That doesn't really indicate anything.
That is a surprisingly apt comparison. Pokemon is the most deviously complex game I've come across. I tried multiplayer and got beatdown pretty hard (In the days before I knew what EV training was.) I'll just put 80 hours into single player like I usually do.Onyx Oblivion said:Oh, I understand. I just hate the misinformation that Yahtzee can spread. Like how it hasn't changed in 15 years. Just because it's still turn based. The underlying mechanics have gone through quite a few changes.Manji187 said:Heh...someone looks insulted.Onyx Oblivion said:You got your game strategy thrown off by EMOLGA enough to complain about it? Pokemon wasn't EASY enough for you that a Gym Leader you COULDN'T sweep with one move is a negative point against it?
The bane of Yahtzee's existence.
Besides, "catching them all" is no longer viable...or even the point, really. It's all about competitive play, with the advent of wi-fi in D/P/P.
What's the matter? Is Pokemon one of your favorite franchises? You have to admit that it's not for everyone. Same with a lot of other games/ activities.
He's the FOX News of game reviews.
First off, I think we can agree the limitations of the item bag in the early games was simply that the games were older and storage space in the game itself was lower for data and such. It isn't really stupid, just unavoidable back in the old days (the 90's)Onyx Oblivion said:From the infinite TM use of B/W, to the infinite item bag after R/B/Y's STUPID limit, to the addition of Abilites in Gen 3, The Special split in Gen 2, the Special/Physical MOVE split in Gen 4, and even the removal/addition of new HMs for world exploration, to the key item mapping for easy Bike use.