Zero Punctuation: Pokemon White

Recommended Videos

kuposenpai

New member
Nov 23, 2009
92
0
0
I liked pokemon back in the good old days. And I was astonished by pokemon and rule # 34. my poor child hood. my main problem is with pokemon now is that they're pushing too much, much too late. I even have a pokdex on my droid phone.. and one morning to wake up that it was set on auto-update and I received 1st hand glance at these.... new 'things'.

One of my main problems is with creature design in general. Specifically, one new gothic pokemon to counter everyones fantasies on Gardevoir (at least thats how i saw it.. my poor child hood.), and this one psychic type who; and I want you all to rest assure I'm crystal clear on this... looks like a cross between green eggs and ham and a fetus. Reuniclus, thats the things name. And more useless water/flyers? At least Magikarp can ride in the carpool lane, unfortunately he'll still be in the trunk til he takes his spinach. Fly you beautiful bastards, FLY!
 

Lucie

New member
Mar 28, 2011
60
0
0
garjian said:
Lucie said:
Jdb said:
I want to know why some people think Pokemon is a super-complex game. Raising Pokemon is complex, but when it comes to battles between similarly-raised Pokemon it's just crossing fingers and hoping the other guy doesn't send out scissors when paper is in play.
Or hope he doesn't send in a level 1 Rattata.
Tip: turn your volume down
thats why you have scissors, rock and paper all on one pokemon.

this rattata strategy is easily beaten by any pokemon with any increased priority move, or status effects.
also, ghost types.
you fail.
It wasn't to be taken seriously, jeez. It was just a joke.
 

LeonLethality

New member
Mar 10, 2009
5,810
0
0
Caliostro said:
Dreiko said:
So chess or any card game in general is something nobody can be serious about?


Gotta inform all those people who actually are serious about those things, quick, run!
In chess both players have 16 pieces, and a 64 square board, with very specific movement constraints for each piece.

In card games, the ones taken seriously that I can remember at least, the players hands aren't showing.

Pokemon is like a chess match with 2 lanes and 1 queen each, or a poker game where everyone's hands are showing. It's not "strategy", it's memorizing a spread sheet.
In Pokemon you have six Pokemon, each with an ability, stats and four moves. with nigh infinite combinations. There is a huge amount of strategy involved, who to lead with, what moves to give a Pokemon to counter its weakness, how one Pokemon in a team can compliment another, how to counter someone who has their bases covered as well, what EVs to give to a Pokemon. There is a lot more strategy to a Pokemon battle than there is to Chess. Go in to a competitive battle without any strategy and watch how well your spread sheet memorization works.
 

garjian

New member
Mar 25, 2009
1,013
0
0
Lucie said:
garjian said:
Lucie said:
Jdb said:
I want to know why some people think Pokemon is a super-complex game. Raising Pokemon is complex, but when it comes to battles between similarly-raised Pokemon it's just crossing fingers and hoping the other guy doesn't send out scissors when paper is in play.
Or hope he doesn't send in a level 1 Rattata.
thats why you have scissors, rock and paper all on one pokemon.

this rattata strategy is easily beaten by any pokemon with any increased priority move, or status effects.
also, ghost types.
you fail.
It wasn't to be taken seriously, jeez. It was just a joke.
but it wasnt though... it was a reply adding to someones somewhat-lacking observations on the strategy of this game which were to be taken seriously, and thus the whole arguement is to be taken seriously. and its flawed, so it needed correcting.
 

jak1165

New member
Jul 16, 2009
79
0
0
LeonLethality said:
Caliostro said:
Dreiko said:
So chess or any card game in general is something nobody can be serious about?


Gotta inform all those people who actually are serious about those things, quick, run!
In chess both players have 16 pieces, and a 64 square board, with very specific movement constraints for each piece.

In card games, the ones taken seriously that I can remember at least, the players hands aren't showing.

Pokemon is like a chess match with 2 lanes and 1 queen each, or a poker game where everyone's hands are showing. It's not "strategy", it's memorizing a spread sheet.
In Pokemon you have six Pokemon, each with an ability, stats and four moves. with nigh infinite combinations. There is a huge amount of strategy involved, who to lead with, what moves to give a Pokemon to counter its weakness, how one Pokemon in a team can compliment another, how to counter someone who has their bases covered as well, what EVs to give to a Pokemon. There is a lot more strategy to a Pokemon battle than there is to Chess. Go in to a competitive battle without any strategy and watch how well your spread sheet memorization works.
But...but...itz da same gaem!!!

Cool, someone actually understands Pokemon
 

randommaster

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,802
0
0
DarkRyter said:
He finally reviews Pokemon and surprise, surprise, he doesn't like it.

I actually thought he'd hate it more, what with it embodying so many things he doesn't like, ie overfranchising, lack of innovation, turn based strategy, etc.
Well, he did watch the anime and play the 1st gen games.

What I find hilarious is that he doesn't really say anything new concerning the mechanics or story, yet people are flipping out.
 

Irony's Acolyte

Back from the Depths
Mar 9, 2010
3,636
0
0
randommaster said:
Irony said:
randommaster said:
You really should have picked up Pokemon Black, Yahtzee. It focuses on story rather than collecting a bunch of critters. At one point you have to choose whether to choose between your friend and your journey, with a branching story for each path. It's pretty much two entirely different games and it puts the Bioware writing staff to shame.

I'm sorry you had to get the wrong version to get back into what has become a great series.
Wait there's a major difference between the two versions? What is this madness?
Ah, this is a very common mistake. Madness, most often of the unusual events variety, has been used as the description for something which, in actuality, is a prominent city-state in ancient Greece.
But good sir, I used the word in the way that would satisfy the definition used by the dictionary. There was no reference to any Greek city-state.
 

Dreiko_v1legacy

New member
Aug 28, 2008
4,696
0
0
Caliostro said:
Dreiko said:
So chess or any card game in general is something nobody can be serious about?


Gotta inform all those people who actually are serious about those things, quick, run!
In chess both players have 16 pieces, and a 64 square board, with very specific movement constraints for each piece.

In card games, the ones taken seriously that I can remember at least, the players hands aren't showing.

Pokemon is like a chess match with 2 lanes and 1 queen each, or a poker game where everyone's hands are showing. It's not "strategy", it's memorizing a spread sheet.

Here's what you're failing to realize, in Pokemon the strategy happens as you choose the team you'll be using. Battles are a segment of the pokemon game, not it's entirety.





There's 600+ pokemon and each can learn around 40 moves, which pokemon, with which moves, with which other pokemon, which which other moves etc. etc. is the best combination for your team is a purely strategical aspect of the game and how your team is equipped to deal with every threat is purely a matter of strategy as there are many ways of dealing with something.


If you think everyone just picks any 6 buggers cause they like them and then try to shallowly guess their way into victory you're sorely mistaken I'm afraid.
 

Dragonpit

New member
Nov 10, 2010
637
0
0
Yes. Well, part of Pokemon's strategy comes from dealing with dual-types. Still, the game does raise a lot of...interesting questions about that world.
 

randommaster

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,802
0
0
Irony said:
randommaster said:
Irony said:
randommaster said:
You really should have picked up Pokemon Black, Yahtzee. It focuses on story rather than collecting a bunch of critters. At one point you have to choose whether to choose between your friend and your journey, with a branching story for each path. It's pretty much two entirely different games and it puts the Bioware writing staff to shame.

I'm sorry you had to get the wrong version to get back into what has become a great series.
Wait there's a major difference between the two versions? What is this madness?
Ah, this is a very common mistake. Madness, most often of the unusual events variety, has been used as the description for something which, in actuality, is a prominent city-state in ancient Greece.
But good sir, I used the word in the way that would satisfy the definition used by the dictionary. There was no reference to any Greek city-state.
But you forget, my friend, that the dictionary is oftentimes outdated and is not updated when popular phrases from kings of said city-states are depicted as using the word in a new context, thereby causing the population at large to adopt this new meaning.
 

Dragonpit

New member
Nov 10, 2010
637
0
0
Dreiko said:
Caliostro said:
Dreiko said:
So chess or any card game in general is something nobody can be serious about?


Gotta inform all those people who actually are serious about those things, quick, run!
In chess both players have 16 pieces, and a 64 square board, with very specific movement constraints for each piece.

In card games, the ones taken seriously that I can remember at least, the players hands aren't showing.

Pokemon is like a chess match with 2 lanes and 1 queen each, or a poker game where everyone's hands are showing. It's not "strategy", it's memorizing a spread sheet.

Here's what you're failing to realize, in Pokemon the strategy happens as you choose the team you'll be using. Battles are a segment of the pokemon game, not it's entirety.





There's 600+ pokemon and each can learn around 40 moves, which pokemon, with which moves, with which other pokemon, which which other moves etc. etc. is the best combination for your team is a purely strategical aspect of the game and how your team is equipped to deal with every threat is purely a matter of strategy as there are many ways of dealing with something.


If you think everyone just picks any 6 buggers cause they like them and then try to shallowly guess their way into victory you're sorely mistaken I'm afraid.
I'm afraid my friend's little brother would beg to differ on that point, seeing as he finished his game with the first six Pokemon he picked up.
 

LeonLethality

New member
Mar 10, 2009
5,810
0
0
jak1165 said:
But...but...itz da same gaem!!!

Cool, someone actually understands Pokemon
If someone honestly told me it was the same game I would smack them and tell them about how things have changed with things such as the physical special split, the EV and IV system reduxes and all that jazz.
 

TerranReaper

New member
Mar 28, 2009
953
0
0
Dragonpit said:
Dreiko said:
Caliostro said:
Dreiko said:
So chess or any card game in general is something nobody can be serious about?


Gotta inform all those people who actually are serious about those things, quick, run!
In chess both players have 16 pieces, and a 64 square board, with very specific movement constraints for each piece.

In card games, the ones taken seriously that I can remember at least, the players hands aren't showing.

Pokemon is like a chess match with 2 lanes and 1 queen each, or a poker game where everyone's hands are showing. It's not "strategy", it's memorizing a spread sheet.

Here's what you're failing to realize, in Pokemon the strategy happens as you choose the team you'll be using. Battles are a segment of the pokemon game, not it's entirety.





There's 600+ pokemon and each can learn around 40 moves, which pokemon, with which moves, with which other pokemon, which which other moves etc. etc. is the best combination for your team is a purely strategical aspect of the game and how your team is equipped to deal with every threat is purely a matter of strategy as there are many ways of dealing with something.


If you think everyone just picks any 6 buggers cause they like them and then try to shallowly guess their way into victory you're sorely mistaken I'm afraid.
I'm afraid my friend's little brother would beg to differ on that point, seeing as he finished his game with the first six Pokemon he picked up.
I think he meant in the context of multiplayer battles. Anyone can beat the singleplayer easily without much grinding, this being especially true with the newest ones.

OT: Funnily enough, I beat the third gym with the electric zebra, because Emolga takes normal damage from electric attacks being electric/flying. Only real trouble was the gym leader's own electric zebra, in which case, my ground/dark crocodile took care of easily.
 

jak1165

New member
Jul 16, 2009
79
0
0
Dragonpit said:
Dreiko said:
Caliostro said:
Dreiko said:
So chess or any card game in general is something nobody can be serious about?


Gotta inform all those people who actually are serious about those things, quick, run!
In chess both players have 16 pieces, and a 64 square board, with very specific movement constraints for each piece.

In card games, the ones taken seriously that I can remember at least, the players hands aren't showing.

Pokemon is like a chess match with 2 lanes and 1 queen each, or a poker game where everyone's hands are showing. It's not "strategy", it's memorizing a spread sheet.

Here's what you're failing to realize, in Pokemon the strategy happens as you choose the team you'll be using. Battles are a segment of the pokemon game, not it's entirety.





There's 600+ pokemon and each can learn around 40 moves, which pokemon, with which moves, with which other pokemon, which which other moves etc. etc. is the best combination for your team is a purely strategical aspect of the game and how your team is equipped to deal with every threat is purely a matter of strategy as there are many ways of dealing with something.


If you think everyone just picks any 6 buggers cause they like them and then try to shallowly guess their way into victory you're sorely mistaken I'm afraid.
I'm afraid my friend's little brother would beg to differ on that point, seeing as he finished his game with the first six Pokemon he picked up.
Oh, your pointless anecdote beat a fairly easy game? Now if he so chooses he can start breeding so he can actually play the real game
 

LeonLethality

New member
Mar 10, 2009
5,810
0
0
Dragonpit said:
I'm afraid my friend's little brother would beg to differ on that point, seeing as he finished his game with the first six Pokemon he picked up.
The main game is easy stuff, it's meant to be that way. Try going through the battle subway or competitive play with those first six and see how many losses you rack up.
 

jak1165

New member
Jul 16, 2009
79
0
0
LeonLethality said:
jak1165 said:
But...but...itz da same gaem!!!

Cool, someone actually understands Pokemon
If someone honestly told me it was the same game I would smack them and tell them about how things have changed with things such as the physical special split, the EV and IV system reduxes and all that jazz.
Hey man, you're preaching to the choir here. I just started to get back into competitive Pokemon...I'll admit the phrase "competitive Pokemon" raises my self-conscious-nerdness by about 20%...but it's addictive lol
 

Coldster

New member
Oct 29, 2010
541
0
0
LeonLethality said:
Caliostro said:
Dreiko said:
So chess or any card game in general is something nobody can be serious about?


Gotta inform all those people who actually are serious about those things, quick, run!
In chess both players have 16 pieces, and a 64 square board, with very specific movement constraints for each piece.

In card games, the ones taken seriously that I can remember at least, the players hands aren't showing.

Pokemon is like a chess match with 2 lanes and 1 queen each, or a poker game where everyone's hands are showing. It's not "strategy", it's memorizing a spread sheet.
In Pokemon you have six Pokemon, each with an ability, stats and four moves. with nigh infinite combinations. There is a huge amount of strategy involved, who to lead with, what moves to give a Pokemon to counter its weakness, how one Pokemon in a team can compliment another, how to counter someone who has their bases covered as well, what EVs to give to a Pokemon. There is a lot more strategy to a Pokemon battle than there is to Chess. Go in to a competitive battle without any strategy and watch how well your spread sheet memorization works.
Ha! If there actually was alot of strategy involved with Pokemon then I was a genius when I was six.

My Captcha says "Boose laser". What is that supposed to mean?
 

Giest4life

The Saucepan Man
Feb 13, 2010
1,554
0
0
Why must there always be someone on Yahtzee's video that goes on probation for early posting? Yeesh.

OT: I don't know anything about Pokemon other than how to spell them and that they are from Japan. But this still was a great episode. I guess those ample references to gentiles and self-mutilation paid off!