It wasn't to be taken seriously, jeez. It was just a joke.garjian said:thats why you have scissors, rock and paper all on one pokemon.Lucie said:Or hope he doesn't send in a level 1 Rattata.Jdb said:I want to know why some people think Pokemon is a super-complex game. Raising Pokemon is complex, but when it comes to battles between similarly-raised Pokemon it's just crossing fingers and hoping the other guy doesn't send out scissors when paper is in play.
Tip: turn your volume down
this rattata strategy is easily beaten by any pokemon with any increased priority move, or status effects.
also, ghost types.
you fail.
In Pokemon you have six Pokemon, each with an ability, stats and four moves. with nigh infinite combinations. There is a huge amount of strategy involved, who to lead with, what moves to give a Pokemon to counter its weakness, how one Pokemon in a team can compliment another, how to counter someone who has their bases covered as well, what EVs to give to a Pokemon. There is a lot more strategy to a Pokemon battle than there is to Chess. Go in to a competitive battle without any strategy and watch how well your spread sheet memorization works.Caliostro said:In chess both players have 16 pieces, and a 64 square board, with very specific movement constraints for each piece.Dreiko said:So chess or any card game in general is something nobody can be serious about?
Gotta inform all those people who actually are serious about those things, quick, run!
In card games, the ones taken seriously that I can remember at least, the players hands aren't showing.
Pokemon is like a chess match with 2 lanes and 1 queen each, or a poker game where everyone's hands are showing. It's not "strategy", it's memorizing a spread sheet.
but it wasnt though... it was a reply adding to someones somewhat-lacking observations on the strategy of this game which were to be taken seriously, and thus the whole arguement is to be taken seriously. and its flawed, so it needed correcting.Lucie said:It wasn't to be taken seriously, jeez. It was just a joke.garjian said:thats why you have scissors, rock and paper all on one pokemon.Lucie said:Or hope he doesn't send in a level 1 Rattata.Jdb said:I want to know why some people think Pokemon is a super-complex game. Raising Pokemon is complex, but when it comes to battles between similarly-raised Pokemon it's just crossing fingers and hoping the other guy doesn't send out scissors when paper is in play.
this rattata strategy is easily beaten by any pokemon with any increased priority move, or status effects.
also, ghost types.
you fail.
But...but...itz da same gaem!!!LeonLethality said:In Pokemon you have six Pokemon, each with an ability, stats and four moves. with nigh infinite combinations. There is a huge amount of strategy involved, who to lead with, what moves to give a Pokemon to counter its weakness, how one Pokemon in a team can compliment another, how to counter someone who has their bases covered as well, what EVs to give to a Pokemon. There is a lot more strategy to a Pokemon battle than there is to Chess. Go in to a competitive battle without any strategy and watch how well your spread sheet memorization works.Caliostro said:In chess both players have 16 pieces, and a 64 square board, with very specific movement constraints for each piece.Dreiko said:So chess or any card game in general is something nobody can be serious about?
Gotta inform all those people who actually are serious about those things, quick, run!
In card games, the ones taken seriously that I can remember at least, the players hands aren't showing.
Pokemon is like a chess match with 2 lanes and 1 queen each, or a poker game where everyone's hands are showing. It's not "strategy", it's memorizing a spread sheet.
Well, he did watch the anime and play the 1st gen games.DarkRyter said:He finally reviews Pokemon and surprise, surprise, he doesn't like it.
I actually thought he'd hate it more, what with it embodying so many things he doesn't like, ie overfranchising, lack of innovation, turn based strategy, etc.
But good sir, I used the word in the way that would satisfy the definition used by the dictionary. There was no reference to any Greek city-state.randommaster said:Ah, this is a very common mistake. Madness, most often of the unusual events variety, has been used as the description for something which, in actuality, is a prominent city-state in ancient Greece.Irony said:Wait there's a major difference between the two versions? What is this madness?randommaster said:You really should have picked up Pokemon Black, Yahtzee. It focuses on story rather than collecting a bunch of critters. At one point you have to choose whether to choose between your friend and your journey, with a branching story for each path. It's pretty much two entirely different games and it puts the Bioware writing staff to shame.
I'm sorry you had to get the wrong version to get back into what has become a great series.
Caliostro said:In chess both players have 16 pieces, and a 64 square board, with very specific movement constraints for each piece.Dreiko said:So chess or any card game in general is something nobody can be serious about?
Gotta inform all those people who actually are serious about those things, quick, run!
In card games, the ones taken seriously that I can remember at least, the players hands aren't showing.
Pokemon is like a chess match with 2 lanes and 1 queen each, or a poker game where everyone's hands are showing. It's not "strategy", it's memorizing a spread sheet.
badum ching!HankMan said:I think I know why Yahtzee really doesn't like Pokemon.
It's because he hates going to the gym!
But you forget, my friend, that the dictionary is oftentimes outdated and is not updated when popular phrases from kings of said city-states are depicted as using the word in a new context, thereby causing the population at large to adopt this new meaning.Irony said:But good sir, I used the word in the way that would satisfy the definition used by the dictionary. There was no reference to any Greek city-state.randommaster said:Ah, this is a very common mistake. Madness, most often of the unusual events variety, has been used as the description for something which, in actuality, is a prominent city-state in ancient Greece.Irony said:Wait there's a major difference between the two versions? What is this madness?randommaster said:You really should have picked up Pokemon Black, Yahtzee. It focuses on story rather than collecting a bunch of critters. At one point you have to choose whether to choose between your friend and your journey, with a branching story for each path. It's pretty much two entirely different games and it puts the Bioware writing staff to shame.
I'm sorry you had to get the wrong version to get back into what has become a great series.
I'm afraid my friend's little brother would beg to differ on that point, seeing as he finished his game with the first six Pokemon he picked up.Dreiko said:Caliostro said:In chess both players have 16 pieces, and a 64 square board, with very specific movement constraints for each piece.Dreiko said:So chess or any card game in general is something nobody can be serious about?
Gotta inform all those people who actually are serious about those things, quick, run!
In card games, the ones taken seriously that I can remember at least, the players hands aren't showing.
Pokemon is like a chess match with 2 lanes and 1 queen each, or a poker game where everyone's hands are showing. It's not "strategy", it's memorizing a spread sheet.
Here's what you're failing to realize, in Pokemon the strategy happens as you choose the team you'll be using. Battles are a segment of the pokemon game, not it's entirety.
There's 600+ pokemon and each can learn around 40 moves, which pokemon, with which moves, with which other pokemon, which which other moves etc. etc. is the best combination for your team is a purely strategical aspect of the game and how your team is equipped to deal with every threat is purely a matter of strategy as there are many ways of dealing with something.
If you think everyone just picks any 6 buggers cause they like them and then try to shallowly guess their way into victory you're sorely mistaken I'm afraid.
If someone honestly told me it was the same game I would smack them and tell them about how things have changed with things such as the physical special split, the EV and IV system reduxes and all that jazz.jak1165 said:But...but...itz da same gaem!!!
Cool, someone actually understands Pokemon
I think he meant in the context of multiplayer battles. Anyone can beat the singleplayer easily without much grinding, this being especially true with the newest ones.Dragonpit said:I'm afraid my friend's little brother would beg to differ on that point, seeing as he finished his game with the first six Pokemon he picked up.Dreiko said:Caliostro said:In chess both players have 16 pieces, and a 64 square board, with very specific movement constraints for each piece.Dreiko said:So chess or any card game in general is something nobody can be serious about?
Gotta inform all those people who actually are serious about those things, quick, run!
In card games, the ones taken seriously that I can remember at least, the players hands aren't showing.
Pokemon is like a chess match with 2 lanes and 1 queen each, or a poker game where everyone's hands are showing. It's not "strategy", it's memorizing a spread sheet.
Here's what you're failing to realize, in Pokemon the strategy happens as you choose the team you'll be using. Battles are a segment of the pokemon game, not it's entirety.
There's 600+ pokemon and each can learn around 40 moves, which pokemon, with which moves, with which other pokemon, which which other moves etc. etc. is the best combination for your team is a purely strategical aspect of the game and how your team is equipped to deal with every threat is purely a matter of strategy as there are many ways of dealing with something.
If you think everyone just picks any 6 buggers cause they like them and then try to shallowly guess their way into victory you're sorely mistaken I'm afraid.
Oh, your pointless anecdote beat a fairly easy game? Now if he so chooses he can start breeding so he can actually play the real gameDragonpit said:I'm afraid my friend's little brother would beg to differ on that point, seeing as he finished his game with the first six Pokemon he picked up.Dreiko said:Caliostro said:In chess both players have 16 pieces, and a 64 square board, with very specific movement constraints for each piece.Dreiko said:So chess or any card game in general is something nobody can be serious about?
Gotta inform all those people who actually are serious about those things, quick, run!
In card games, the ones taken seriously that I can remember at least, the players hands aren't showing.
Pokemon is like a chess match with 2 lanes and 1 queen each, or a poker game where everyone's hands are showing. It's not "strategy", it's memorizing a spread sheet.
Here's what you're failing to realize, in Pokemon the strategy happens as you choose the team you'll be using. Battles are a segment of the pokemon game, not it's entirety.
There's 600+ pokemon and each can learn around 40 moves, which pokemon, with which moves, with which other pokemon, which which other moves etc. etc. is the best combination for your team is a purely strategical aspect of the game and how your team is equipped to deal with every threat is purely a matter of strategy as there are many ways of dealing with something.
If you think everyone just picks any 6 buggers cause they like them and then try to shallowly guess their way into victory you're sorely mistaken I'm afraid.
The main game is easy stuff, it's meant to be that way. Try going through the battle subway or competitive play with those first six and see how many losses you rack up.Dragonpit said:I'm afraid my friend's little brother would beg to differ on that point, seeing as he finished his game with the first six Pokemon he picked up.
Hey man, you're preaching to the choir here. I just started to get back into competitive Pokemon...I'll admit the phrase "competitive Pokemon" raises my self-conscious-nerdness by about 20%...but it's addictive lolLeonLethality said:If someone honestly told me it was the same game I would smack them and tell them about how things have changed with things such as the physical special split, the EV and IV system reduxes and all that jazz.jak1165 said:But...but...itz da same gaem!!!
Cool, someone actually understands Pokemon
Ha! If there actually was alot of strategy involved with Pokemon then I was a genius when I was six.LeonLethality said:In Pokemon you have six Pokemon, each with an ability, stats and four moves. with nigh infinite combinations. There is a huge amount of strategy involved, who to lead with, what moves to give a Pokemon to counter its weakness, how one Pokemon in a team can compliment another, how to counter someone who has their bases covered as well, what EVs to give to a Pokemon. There is a lot more strategy to a Pokemon battle than there is to Chess. Go in to a competitive battle without any strategy and watch how well your spread sheet memorization works.Caliostro said:In chess both players have 16 pieces, and a 64 square board, with very specific movement constraints for each piece.Dreiko said:So chess or any card game in general is something nobody can be serious about?
Gotta inform all those people who actually are serious about those things, quick, run!
In card games, the ones taken seriously that I can remember at least, the players hands aren't showing.
Pokemon is like a chess match with 2 lanes and 1 queen each, or a poker game where everyone's hands are showing. It's not "strategy", it's memorizing a spread sheet.