Nothing is for free...so for the sake of stupidity she deserves it but for fine-printing the "we will charge you enormous amounts of money for accepting this offer" clause they deserve a studded belt across the ass and be ordered to repay the funds
I agree.razer17 said:One thinks that the phrase "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me" is very applicable in this situation. To be honest, she doesn't a penny for doing it twice. In fact, she doesn't deserve anything, because I'm sure the $9.99 charge was in the small print, maybe she should have read it
That's an insult to spreadsheets. At least I can scare my friends with spreadsheets.AgentChunk said:As long a Zynga burns I don't care. Farmville is about as fun as spreadsheet software.
Dude... WoW is WoW for casual-tards.Reuq said:Farmville is like wow for casual-tards, it soaks up lives.
I thought the phrase sounded like this :razer17 said:One thinks that the phrase "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me" is very applicable in this situation.
People this bloody stupid shouldn't be allowed control over their finances, for their own good.Malygris said:The plaintiff in this case, Rebecca Swift, first provided her cellphone number to a Zynga advertiser in April so she could be sent a code for "Yocash," the currency used in the Zynga game Yoville. She claims that while she wasn't told that there would be any charges applied to her account, she was billed $9.99 four separate times, beginning in April, "without her knowledge or consent." Then in June she answered an advertisement for a "risk-free Green Tea Purity trial" while playing the same game, providing the advertiser her debit card number and agreeing to a $5.95 shipping charge. However, although she was informed that she could cancel the trial anytime within 15 days, her attempts to cancel apparently failed; she was ultimately charged over $165 for two shipments of green tea pills and tea bags which she has thus far been unable to recover.