I wouldn't recommend canvassing for Kamala with the top right one - you'd be in the wrong country. (I'm pretty sure that's the UK from the style of building, police garb, and absence of vast quantities of guns.)
What would you call it when Biden's caught on mic pledging behind closed doors to donors nothing will fundamentally change and apologizing for the appearance of his platform, and stacking his campaign with lobbyists and think tank weasels, while his campaign publicly touts "ThE mOsT pRoGrEsSiVe PlAtFoRm EvEr!"?If you pledge to betray someone, then surely it isn't a betrayal?
We went over that in the Biden task force thread. Do we have to go over it again?Biden's environmental plan has 20 times the funds allocated to it than Clinton's. Then there's the universally-available public healthcare option. I'd say those are some pretty major differences.
Maybe they're Americans visiting overseas and just need to be reminded of their civic duty.I wouldn't recommend canvassing for Kamala with the top right one - you'd be in the wrong country. (I'm pretty sure that's the UK from the style of building, police garb, and absence of vast quantities of guns.)
It was a joke based on the wording. If he says he's going to betray someone, then betraying that person is... fulfilling his word, and thus not a betrayal.What would you call it when Biden's caught on mic [...]
You say that as if the discussion concluded neatly in your favour, rather than with both of us failing to convince the other.We went over that in the Biden task force thread. Do we have to go over it again?
Unless he's telling two different groups of people contradictory and exclusive things, promising one group he doesn't mean anything he says to the other. Then it becomes not so much a joke, as serious cause for alarm for his intentions should be become president.It was a joke based on the wording. If he says he's going to betray someone, then betraying that person is... fulfilling his word, and thus not a betrayal.
He also was pro drone strikes, killing about a thousand innocents, kids in cages, paying the Mexican military to abuse refugees and socialism for the rich. And that’s only in his last major tenureBiden 2020. I don't think there's a huge policy distinction, so it's down to the person. Biden has flaws galore, but they're relatable, predictable flaws. He sticks his foot in his mouth, he lets his family get away with corruption, these are sympathetic flaws. Clinton's flaws are not normal people flaws. They're like psycho flaws. I voted a big "neither" in 2016, but there wasn't the tiniest chance of me voting Clinton with the footage of "we came, we saw, he died" floating about.
What even are your politics CM? You don't talk much but you also don't seem to be snippy about your short posts so I'm curious.Not the worst person he could have picked, to be honest.
It could have been Amy...Not the worst person he could have picked, to be honest.
Frankly Klobuchar would have been a better pick. Biden's not been performing well in Minnesota polls the past month, barely being outside MoE, and the state's gone from "safe Democratic" to "likely Democratic" in that time. Yesterday's Emerson poll doesn't even show Biden leading outside the MoE. Picking Klobuchar would have helped shore up the vote in a state that may well turn out in the "battleground state" category before November.It could have been Amy...
I don’t think picking the person who released Chauvin on his last murder would have been a big selling point. Say what you will about Harris, she hasn’t caused massive riots across the country.Frankly Klobuchar would have been a better pick. Biden's not been performing well in Minnesota polls the past month, barely being outside MoE, and the state's gone from "safe Democratic" to "likely Democratic" in that time. Yesterday's Emerson poll doesn't even show Biden leading outside the MoE. Picking Klobuchar would have helped shore up the vote in a state that may well turn out in the "battleground state" category before November.
Right-wing, beyond any doubt. It's just that the topics I'm very far to the right on, I don't tend to talk about them here.What even are your politics CM?
I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean by this?You don't talk much but you also don't seem to be snippy about your short posts so I'm curious.
In not as few degrees of separation as Klobuchar, but Harris and the policies she supports very much has. Klobuchar also has the benefit of not having hours' worth of speech and debate footage of her openly mocking racial and economic justice protest, activists, and progressives, and attacking Biden on the primary debate stage for his Senate record on racial justice issues.I don’t think picking the person who released Chauvin on his last murder would have been a big selling point. Say what you will about Harris, she hasn’t caused massive riots across the country.
Revisionist? It's on tape in the fox news archives. Thing done by obama vs the same thing done by trump. It's hilariously transparent.Ya know we've known about this for a while right?
Can we stop with this revisionist bull shit?
Yeah...remember when that wasn't a controversial statement?Claiming there is no racism is about as blatantly wrong as claiming all white people are racists.
Biden will not be alive in eight years.Yeah...remember when that wasn't a controversial statement?
On other news, does this mean that we get Biden for two terms, a Republican for one term, and then Kamala runs for president? I mean, history repeats itself sometimes...
All white people are racist. So are all black, Asian, etc. people as well.
Statistically, he's got a better than average chance of being alive in 8 years. He's 77, and the life expectancy for the richest Americans is 86 for men.Biden will not be alive in eight years.
It should have been Tulsi... but then again, Biden and Tulis are too far apart politically.It could have been Amy...