*Oddworld facepalm*antipunt said:*facepalm*
Fucking pedos... Ibuprofen is given by school health centers all the damn time. I would sue.
*Oddworld facepalm*antipunt said:*facepalm*
Where have you been? This kind of shit is common now...SyphonX said:This is something you would expect in the most corrupt and disturbing fascist states in history. The mere notion that the act is going to be discussed from being right or wrong in the supreme court sickens me. Though it really doesn't fucking surprise me anymore.
Oh! My bad! You're more than welcome to rant as much as you like on the subject... someone must!SyphonX said:Wasn't trying to say you disagreed or anything, I just took an opportunity to rant some more.the_hessian said:I'm not disagreeing... I completely agree that it's a totally f***ed up state of affairs, and utterly shambolic that it is required to even be discussed by the supreme court, it is nothing short of a travisty of justice.
The world is a totally f***ed place at times...
mikemart said:i read the article and thats just insane.
Seriously now?
just for pills?
If the supreme court doesnt see this wrong i dont know what they wont find wrong
And if they rule in favour of granting schools the right to make a girl strip for legal pills?Slycne said:I'm surprised by how many people are upset over the fact that the Supreme Court is making a decision on this. Even if you think the decision is an easy one, it's a Constitutional Rights decision which is going to set precedence for a school's abilities to conduct searches on its students. It's the kind of case that the Supreme Court was set up for.
1) Even if it was a woman, you could file a sexual assualt case, especially if the woman was a lesbian.LockHeart said:Fuck me, it was done by someone without any actual authority to do so?!SyphonX said:Nor authorities or guardians were informed. It was conducted by school staff, a female assistant and a school-nurse I do believe. It is disturbing regardless of gender, but if it were males that searched her, yes it would have been disgusting.TheTygerfire said:Was it even done by a woman police officer? If not that could also warrant a sexual assualt/abuse case.
Thing is, another student was caught with pills, and when confronted, she said "Oh, she gave/sold them to me..." Of course, nobody who was guilty ever tried to pass the buck. [/sarcasm]Damien the Pigeon said:I don't think that schools should have the right to do stuff like this (assuming they actually do). It's definitely a violation of privacy. If stuff like this needs to be done, it shouldn't be a random "on the spot" thing. There should be a real concern and cause for suspicion (like another student says that they saw another selling drugs, etc.).
Yeah, the definitely need more solid evidence before doing an entire strip search. As a matter of fact, if it's a complete strip search, they damn well better have solid evidence and be in immediate danger. I agree with you; it's total BS.orannis62 said:Thing is, another student was caught with pills, and when confronted, she said "Oh, she gave/sold them to me..." Of course, nobody who was guilty ever tried to pass the buck. [/sarcasm]Damien the Pigeon said:I don't think that schools should have the right to do stuff like this (assuming they actually do). It's definitely a violation of privacy. If stuff like this needs to be done, it shouldn't be a random "on the spot" thing. There should be a real concern and cause for suspicion (like another student says that they saw another selling drugs, etc.).
As has been said, this is complete bullshit. I really don't know what else to say.
unless the cop was lesbian...TheTygerfire said:Was it even done by a woman police officer? If not that could also warrant a sexual assualt/abuse case.