13-Year Old Girl, Strip Searched ; For what ?

Recommended Videos

Galletea

Inexplicably Awesome
Sep 27, 2008
2,877
0
0
I don't know the full story so I couldn't possibly say. It seems rather horrible from here, but without knowing the context who can say? She might have been bragging to other kids that she'd had something else on her.
 

Specter_

New member
Dec 24, 2008
736
0
0
SyphonX said:
This is something you would expect in the most corrupt and disturbing fascist states in history. The mere notion that the act is going to be discussed from being right or wrong in the supreme court sickens me. Though it really doesn't fucking surprise me anymore.
And that's the reason I won't even use the US for transit anymore.
 

Slash Dementia

New member
Apr 6, 2009
2,692
0
0
I don't even have words for this. This caused an auto-facepalm...
How could a person do this anywhere--especially a school. This just made me mad...
 

Baneat

New member
Jul 18, 2008
2,762
0
0
I'm not sure it's even legal to search someone AT ALL if you aren't a police officer.
 

Grand_Marquis

New member
Feb 9, 2009
137
0
0
Danzaivar said:
For fun maybe?
I was wondering when someone would try for a punchline :p

But guys, you need to calm down a bit. The Supreme Court isn't stupid. There were very obvious rights violations going on here; nobody is going to rule in favor of unconditional strip searches in high schools, I doubt that specific argument is even going to be brought up. This is being taken to the supreme court because 1) it's a constitutional problem, not just a legal one and 2) the ruling will need to apply in equal course to any school where this particular situation arises, because, again, it's a constitutional problem.

The whole zero-tolerance thing has deftly avoided the supreme court for way too long, if you ask me. Locker searches and random drug testing is perfectly reasonable and doesn't violate anything, but the extent to which schools have redefined these previous court decisions in order to abuse powers they aren't even supposed to have is despicable. It comes as no surprise to me that it eventually went too far, I just wish the sup. court had bothered to take notice of the situation first. There's a difference between proactive enforcement and tyranny. And too many schools have been gleefully crossing that line for years now.
 

gmer412

New member
Feb 21, 2008
754
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
Feh I don't care.

Do we really need to have the Supreme Court tied up over such a trivial matter?
It's probably not trivial to the girl and her family.
 

SyphonX

Coffee Bandit
Mar 22, 2009
956
0
0
Well it looks likely that the court will rule in favor of the school.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lUv0U_6g0o

00:58 ; The attorney representing the school quotes Chief Justice Scoliea (SP? no idea) on how he/she says : "It's a matter of embarrassment or in some cases even death."

Say goodbye to reasonable schools and say hello to your children's nether-region orifices being examined for pills on a daily basis.

I better see some news reports on someone being beaten by assailants.
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
gmer412 said:
Internet Kraken said:
Feh I don't care.

Do we really need to have the Supreme Court tied up over such a trivial matter?
It's probably not trivial to the girl and her family.
So that means it warrants Supreme Court attention?
 

the protaginist

New member
Jul 4, 2008
1,411
0
0
ColdStorage said:
Redding was pulled from class by a male vice principal, escorted to an office, where she denied the accusations.
the vice principal is a creep.

Enforcing zero tolerace over Ibuprofen?, get a grip, the man needs to be taught some manners.
A while ago, a girl got in trouble over the "zero tolerance" thing because her friend had an asthma attack, inhaler was empty, so the friend gave her hers. She was sued by the school.
I.E: it's a joke.
This sounds like something my Vice-principal would do. Colossal Pervert.
 

Hungry

New member
Apr 16, 2009
53
0
0
the nurse and the assistant should be arrested for sexual abuse. I don't know if they could charge the vice principal with anything.
 

gmer412

New member
Feb 21, 2008
754
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
gmer412 said:
Internet Kraken said:
Feh I don't care.

Do we really need to have the Supreme Court tied up over such a trivial matter?
It's probably not trivial to the girl and her family.
So that means it warrants Supreme Court attention?
Well, it's a matter of constitutional rights. 4th amendment rights. Does a school have a right to take these measures? It's a perfect supreme court case. Those are the cases that the supreme court takes.
 

GothmogII

Possessor Of Hats
Apr 6, 2008
2,215
0
0
SyphonX said:
Well it looks likely that the court will rule in favor of the school.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lUv0U_6g0o

00:58 ; The attorney representing the school quotes Chief Justice Scoliea (SP? no idea) on how he/she says : "It's a matter of embarrassment or in some cases even death."

Say goodbye to reasonable schools and say hello to your children's nether-region orifices being examined for pills on a daily basis.

I better see some news reports on someone being beaten by assailants.
That was an utterly depressing report right there. God damn it...
 

asinann

New member
Apr 28, 2008
1,602
0
0
Except that upon setting foot on school grounds you have given them the authority to search you, your possessions and your vehicle.

Strip search is a bit extreme though.