15,000 knights are charging at you in full plate mail and all you're armed with is...

Recommended Videos

The_ModeRazor

New member
Jul 29, 2009
2,837
0
0
The hardest object I can find.
If it happens to be a knight, that's fine by me.
Armored knight arms can be devestating.
 

kahlzun

New member
Sep 9, 2009
492
0
0
M1A1 Abrahm.

Any tank, really. Swords wouldn't do shit to it, and they'd be *hell* fun to run over!
 

Yeq

New member
Jul 15, 2009
135
0
0
The crippler crossface. Works every time.

What? It was in smackdown. It's awesome.
 

Skratt

New member
Dec 20, 2008
824
0
0
APC from C&C Renegade

*bink* *bink* *binkbinkbinkbink*


Or the Serious Sam cannon ball gun.
 

Bat Vader

Elite Member
Mar 11, 2009
4,997
2
41
dietpeachsnapple said:
gof22 said:
dietpeachsnapple said:
gof22 said:
dietpeachsnapple said:
gof22 said:
Flos said:
Portal gun.

Why fight when you can run?
I have to agree. Running sounds best in these situations. Hiding also sounds good too.
Huh!

...

Hadn't thought of running actually.

Hiding doubly so. If there are 15,000 in sufficient density, they will either find you... or trample you.
Or by complete random luck they would bypass you leaving you free to run in the other direction.
Why rely on luck when you can rely on bullets?
1 VS. 15,000. Unless you have an entire squadron on guys aiming down the row at them they will eventually surround you. Plus, some bullets may hit the same knights two, three, or even four times there by wasting some ammo.

So if you had lets say 20,000 bullets and four bullets hit each knight you would roughly waste about 5,000 bullets on the same knights.

Plus we also have to factor in pain tolerance, where the body was hit, and all that stuff. Unless of course I am thinking way to much into this.
You seem to be assuming that one must remain in a fixed position and that fortifications are not applicable.

Further, with the correct defensive positions and the right caliber of bullets, 20,000 is more than enough.
Seeing as how we will never reach a conclusion to this debate I say we agree to disagree and draw our own conclusions.
 

Xvito

New member
Aug 16, 2008
2,114
0
0
I'd probably use the third upgrade of the Peacemaker from Jak 3, because it insta-kills everything on-screen.
 

wonkey20

New member
Sep 24, 2009
153
0
0
Tank? If not a tank probably I create full of nades and a good throwing arm/boots of haste.
 

Nannernade

New member
May 18, 2009
1,233
0
0
Hmm... I would have to go with... The M.I.R.V he he, never said I couldn't use the M.I.R.V. ^^
(I'd run backward before I fired.)
 

draxious

New member
Jun 14, 2009
86
0
0
well if its any weapon then i'd have to use the S.A.W. (Squad Automatic Weapon) but something in that time period depends do i have the counter siege waepons on a castle say the rolling logs, catapults, etc.. or am i out in the field in that case i'd run into the forest and use gurrila tactics to pick them off one by one sure it will take a month or maybe more but it would work and it also depends if i have money and in that case i'd buy alot of mercs and have them help me. but thats just what i'd do