There is no correct response so I will keep my opinion to myself, I pose a different question. I didn't see the whole 11 stabs as the main point. If they had footage of the kid stabbing distinctly 11 (or 12?) times into a kid who had yielded after the first few then there should be some more focus on the 11 thing. Since we do not know all or almost any of the facts its hard to call judgement on the 11 stabs. Also, even though its against what I usually think in similar, less lethal situations, while the bully needed to be stopped, did it require a knife? We do not know how this kid was bullied, to what extent, if he was just picked on the normal way, its closer to murder. It depends on the situation, which we will never know because half of the story got stabbed to death.
What opinion I will give is that the kid should not walk. Even if the bully had a weapon, that kid is gonna have problems with having taken a life. Also, while it seems like it came in handy, shouldn't they be concerned some kid carried a weapon to school? Seems like it would be better to just get help.
Interesting situation, makes my head hurt.
What opinion I will give is that the kid should not walk. Even if the bully had a weapon, that kid is gonna have problems with having taken a life. Also, while it seems like it came in handy, shouldn't they be concerned some kid carried a weapon to school? Seems like it would be better to just get help.
Interesting situation, makes my head hurt.