15-year old Stabs Bully 11 Times at Bus Stop, Gets Away With It

Recommended Videos

jimbob123432

New member
Apr 8, 2011
245
0
0
Philip Petrunak said:
Who stabs a guy 12 times in "self defense"? Oh, right I remember now, no one!

The first stab was self-defense, the other 11 were murder. Hands down, no question. This isn't fucking Spartacus; One stab wound to the chest can be fatal, and will take down anyone. This was murder.
Honestly, as a kid who was bullied, I don't know if I would have reacted any differently though. Once he got that first stab he probably got a surge of adrenaline, and mix that with the memories of being repeatedly bullied, and you've got pure rage. It was a "crime of passion", but not necessarily "murder". I don't think he had the mens reas to stop himself. I would charge him (here in Canada) with manslaughter, but not murder.
 

TheScientificIssole

New member
Jun 9, 2011
514
0
0
Hey kids, let's not talk to parents and solve problems, how about we FUCKING MURDER someone!
Christ, why does this shit exist? Fucked-up maniacs who can't see the concept of everything ever from someone. He should be proud that he had the balls to stab a living, breathing bit of the world ELEVEN FUCKING TIMES, and avoid the consequence.
I mean, REALLY! In a few sentences or a few years of the least important part of your life you could have been done with this, but instead the kid murdered someone. In two years both of the people involved would be completely different from what they were, but now one is dead, and the other is a murderer. Who here thinks he can just grow away from the fact that he killed someone. He won't, because he's a psychopath. I hope everyone at school disassociates themselves from this dick and he suffers.
JESUS, I needed that.
EDIT: I spoke out of reasoning, this kid should be hanged or shot or stabbed. He is a fucking hazard to the development of a civilized world, and as it seems LOTS of the Escapist thinks that this isn't murder. IT IS, One argument seems to be that adrenaline cause 11 stabbings, well this kid was being bullied he wasn't strong enough to push through human flesh with a knife fast enough to regret his choices. If I were his parents I would go to the late-abortion clinic immediately.
EDIT 2: Sorry I got mad at the people who supported the kid, and then as you can see went apeshit.
 

Dastardly

Imaginary Friend
Apr 19, 2010
2,420
0
0
jimbob123432 said:
Wow, the first quote hurts. As a black belt, self-defense DOES exist, and it can severely reduce the amount of violence in a situation, if you do it right . Grabbing a weapon, unless you've just "liberated" it from your opponent, just escalates the level of violence, sometimes to a lethal level. If a kid is being bullied, the best thing for that kid is martial arts training. It boosts self-confidence and if they get in a fight, they can put the other guy down without doing undue damage and no one will want to mess with them again.
As someone who has studied full-contact martial arts, martial arts classes do not teach kids how to "take someone down." Classes that use point-bout teaching systems perpetrate several myths that cause even BIGGER problems:

1. Kids learn that they can take an opponent out of a fight with one or two "special attacks."

2. Kids don't learn how to take a real hit, because they are led to believe that can "fight well enough" to never get hit. This is a complete and total myth.

3. Kids learn all manner of grossly impractical "moves" that they then try to apply in a fight. Jump kicks, for instance, are laughably ridiculous in any kind of real fight -- you're sacrificing every bit of balance. Kicking someone in the head? You may as well punch them in the foot for all the sense that makes.

Now, yes, a well-taught martial arts class can increase a child's balance, flexibility, body awareness, and self-confidence. But unless it is full-contact (unethical with kids), it is not teaching them how to fight.

In an actual self-defense situation, your goal isn't to "take your opponent down," which is waaaaay harder than people think. Bear in mind, people get hit by trucks or shot in the head and still put up a fight. Your goal is to buy yourself time and room to get away. If you're surrounded or cornered, especially when outnumbered, your job is to do whatever it takes to create that opening.

In this case, the kid was cornered to the point that he was put in a panic. The sad fact is that he tried to avoid the situation, but it was forced upon him by the assailant(s). Any failing results from the parents of these kids not taking steps to keep things from escalating before it got this bad.
 

knhirt

New member
Nov 9, 2009
399
0
0
The bully had it coming. That's the way of it. I just wish I saw more stories like this in place of all the stories of kids being beaten to death by their bully assailants, kids having to change schools because their bullies won't ever be suspended and kids flat-out committing suicide because of bullying.
Not to mention all the unreported cases - people that grow up to be unstable or simply miserable because of bullying at school.
 

FarleShadow

New member
Oct 31, 2008
432
0
0
knhirt said:
The bully had it coming.
Its disturbing that someone can justify premeditated murder because 'he had it coming'.

And yes, its premeditated, if he grabbed a rock and beat him over the head, it wouldn't be an argument with me, but a weapon is always a calculated decision.
 

jimbob123432

New member
Apr 8, 2011
245
0
0
Dastardly said:
jimbob123432 said:
Wow, the first quote hurts. As a black belt, self-defense DOES exist, and it can severely reduce the amount of violence in a situation, if you do it right . Grabbing a weapon, unless you've just "liberated" it from your opponent, just escalates the level of violence, sometimes to a lethal level. If a kid is being bullied, the best thing for that kid is martial arts training. It boosts self-confidence and if they get in a fight, they can put the other guy down without doing undue damage and no one will want to mess with them again.
As someone who has studied full-contact martial arts, martial arts classes do not teach kids how to "take someone down." Classes that use point-bout teaching systems perpetrate several myths that cause even BIGGER problems:

1. Kids learn that they can take an opponent out of a fight with one or two "special attacks."

2. Kids don't learn how to take a real hit, because they are led to believe that can "fight well enough" to never get hit. This is a complete and total myth.

3. Kids learn all manner of grossly impractical "moves" that they then try to apply in a fight. Jump kicks, for instance, are laughably ridiculous in any kind of real fight -- you're sacrificing every bit of balance. Kicking someone in the head? You may as well punch them in the foot for all the sense that makes.

Now, yes, a well-taught martial arts class can increase a child's balance, flexibility, body awareness, and self-confidence. But unless it is full-contact (unethical with kids), it is not teaching them how to fight.

In an actual self-defense situation, your goal isn't to "take your opponent down," which is waaaaay harder than people think. Bear in mind, people get hit by trucks or shot in the head and still put up a fight. Your goal is to buy yourself time and room to get away. If you're surrounded or cornered, especially when outnumbered, your job is to do whatever it takes to create that opening.

In this case, the kid was cornered to the point that he was put in a panic. The sad fact is that he tried to avoid the situation, but it was forced upon him by the assailant(s). Any failing results from the parents of these kids not taking steps to keep things from escalating before it got this bad.
Oh, I don't think you grasped what I meant, mainly because I really failed to explain it. I study a very traditional, down-to-earth style of fighting, developed during WWII by the residents of Okinawa to fight of invading US soldiers. There are no "crazy jumps, flips, or kicks". I understand that some dojos may not handle full-contact training properly, but mine was quite relaxed about it. I'm not suggesting martial arts training as a quick solution, it takes at least a year to get enough training to defend yourself, not initiate fights. The WORST thing you can teach a child is flashy, Western crap. A good, traditional style is what kids today need to learn.

I still stick with my statement of "don't grab anything" unless the assailant(s) themselves have a weapon . Your opponent may feel threatened by it and, because they don't want to back down, they may escalate.
 

Carboncrown

New member
Oct 17, 2009
368
0
0
Mortai Gravesend said:
Carboncrown said:
BrassButtons said:
Carboncrown said:
Furthermore, I'd actually argue that his life was not in danger, given that
1) This was not the first time he was bullied, what's suddenly gonna provoke murder?
Assault always carries the risk of death. There is no safe way to physically attack someone. It doesn't matter if the bullies were intending to kill him or not, because they could anyway.
There's a reason attempted murder and assault two are different crimes, don't you think?
That's a really stupid argument. You're assuming your reason is why they're two different crimes. And why it isn't the reason you think it is is incredibly simple for most people to see. All you'd need to do is actually look at the definition of attempted murder. It's not hard.
Wait, attempted murder isn't about a failed intent?
Well, in case I'm wrong, I do wholeheartedly apologize. Going by personal "feels" of words in disregard of the actual definition is something that really annoys me.

I wasn't thinking and just wanted to tie your post to my response, which I could have accomplished by saying nothing... Guess I should go to sleep. Bringing legal terms into this was pretty much the opposite of my intentions.

But anyways, you seem to have grasped my meaning, and my intention was for you to consider the whole of my post as the actual argument, even the part that seemingly wasn't directed at you.

Which was:
senordesol said:
*snip*

It doesn't matter how 'likely' it is, the likelihood would be ZERO (to both parties) if they did not attack. If there is even a *chance* he could've been killed due to the assault, then that is reason enough. You have NO legal or moral obligation to gamble with your LIFE. His assailants don't even have to *mean* to kill him, a concussion can kill. A broken rib puncturing a lung can kill, a kick to the head that snaps his neck can kill; but ignoring all of that, NO ONE has the right to kick the crap out of you no matter how 'likely' or 'unlikely' it is to result in your death because ALL IT TAKES is for it to happen JUST ONCE.
I guess I should have said:"His life wasn't actually in reasonable danger."

Or better yet: "Honestly, he probably didn't think he was about to die."

All and all, I'm not afraid to die because of every possible thing that has the slightest chance to do so, and I hope that you or him aren't either.

It was common sense-speech not court-of-law-speech.
Despite what his lawyer might say, I think we can all agree that his motivations was of bottled up anger and general fear, not fear of death.

Reminder for perspective; I'm not saying, that he was wrong to use a knife to defend himself (something that completely unacceptable in a "fair fight".*) It's the nothing for overkill that I disagree with.



*[sub]common-sense-not-law wise[/sub]

EDIT:
BrassButtons said:
Carboncrown said:
BrassButtons said:
Carboncrown said:
Furthermore, I'd actually argue that his life was not in danger, given that
1) This was not the first time he was bullied, what's suddenly gonna provoke murder?
Assault always carries the risk of death. There is no safe way to physically attack someone. It doesn't matter if the bullies were intending to kill him or not, because they could anyway.
There's a reason attempted murder and assault two are different crimes, don't you think?
Yes, but the reason is not because assault carries no risk of death. Assault kills. Even if the assaulter didn't intend for it to happen.
Goddamit, now I'm confusing posters. Well, that response hopefully also works here.

Good night to you all.
 

knhirt

New member
Nov 9, 2009
399
0
0
FarleShadow said:
knhirt said:
The bully had it coming.
Its disturbing that someone can justify premeditated murder because 'he had it coming'.

And yes, its premeditated, if he grabbed a rock and beat him over the head, it wouldn't be an argument with me, but a weapon is always a calculated decision.
What a joke. Should the kid have brought just his fists instead? That's gonna work. Most likely, without the aid of that knife, the kid would have been beaten up and then the bullying would have continued.

Deciding to carry a method of protection is not the same as making a calculated decision to murder somebody.
Think, for a moment. If you were forced into a physical confrontation with a group of people, would you not take something along with you if you could?

Death is not such a terrible thing. Some people deserve to die. That's my opinion, and I'm sticking with it.
 

Valthonis666

New member
Nov 19, 2009
34
0
0
Personally. I LOVE this! Finally, Bullies are starting to get what they fucking deserve! Maybe, if more kids start doing this this shit will stop. I Love the fact that CartoonNetwork and everyone else and their fucking mother are trying to help with this Bullying thing, telling them to go talk to an adult, but that doesn't fucking help. It never does anything! The Adult, normally a teacher, tells the parent, who beats the kid, who in turn beats the original kid being bullied, putting them in a worse spot. That bully fucking deserved it. I put a bully into a brick-wall when i got harassed to the point of snapping, and he better be thanking every god and my two best friends for saving his ass.

Honestly, I care not what other people in this world think anymore. Opinions are assholes, and I'm tired of hearing all the shit.

My kids are going to be educated in every police take down, as well as basic defensive techniques, and I'm going to let them carry a fucking taser around with them. Fuck bullies, and fuck these parents who don't care enough about their kids to help them until its too damn late, then they pin it on someone else, and try to sue them for it.

BTW: GO FLORIDA! I LOVE YOUR LAWS!
 

FarleShadow

New member
Oct 31, 2008
432
0
0
knhirt said:
What a joke. Should the kid have brought just his fists instead? That's gonna work. Most likely, without the aid of that knife, the kid would have been beaten up and then the bullying would have continued.

Deciding to carry a method of protection is not the same as making a calculated decision to murder somebody.
Think, for a moment. If you were forced into a physical confrontation with a group of people, would you not take something along with you if you could?

Death is not such a terrible thing. Some people deserve to die. That's my opinion, and I'm sticking with it.
So escalation in the weaponry is the only answer? Knife doesn't work? Bring a gun?

And then, 'Some people deserve to die. That's my opinion'.

Christ! Are you some psychopath? How can you possible justify murder as a reasonable response?!
 

BoogieManFL

New member
Apr 14, 2008
1,284
0
0
Dastardly said:
jimbob123432 said:
Wow, the first quote hurts. As a black belt, self-defense DOES exist, and it can severely reduce the amount of violence in a situation, if you do it right . Grabbing a weapon, unless you've just "liberated" it from your opponent, just escalates the level of violence, sometimes to a lethal level. If a kid is being bullied, the best thing for that kid is martial arts training. It boosts self-confidence and if they get in a fight, they can put the other guy down without doing undue damage and no one will want to mess with them again.
As someone who has studied full-contact martial arts, martial arts classes do not teach kids how to "take someone down." Classes that use point-bout teaching systems perpetrate several myths that cause even BIGGER problems:

1. Kids learn that they can take an opponent out of a fight with one or two "special attacks."

2. Kids don't learn how to take a real hit, because they are led to believe that can "fight well enough" to never get hit. This is a complete and total myth.

3. Kids learn all manner of grossly impractical "moves" that they then try to apply in a fight. Jump kicks, for instance, are laughably ridiculous in any kind of real fight -- you're sacrificing every bit of balance. Kicking someone in the head? You may as well punch them in the foot for all the sense that makes....

As someone who has been attending Karate classes (Shuri Ti Ha, Jujutsu) twice a week for over a year, fancy jump kicks and the like aren't real Karate, that's sporty bullshit Karate. We're taught real life self defense against commonly wielded weapons and joint locks and ground fighting.
 

Rallus

New member
Mar 28, 2011
32
0
0
Aaah it's in Florida. In the UK there is a law that states that if you are going to defend yourself against a threat you must use 'reasonable force' which is determined by the situation at hand. In this case 11 stabs and killing them isn't reasonable force and should be treated as murder since I reckon this guy, when he pulled out the knife, intended to kill the bully.

Of course I don't know if it's the same in the US and I'm free to be called out on that, but from what I've seen in this case, 'reasonable force' is enough to murder somebody.

My personal opinion is that while it's sad that the boy was bullied, it doesn't excuse him killing the bully and therefore should have been judged as a murderer since that's what he did. I don't think bullying is right but I don't think it deserves death. The bully, given maybe some proper discipline or if the situation was actually solved before this happened, might have grown up to become a better person, but now he can't because he's dead.
 

ryo02

New member
Oct 8, 2007
819
0
0
as a child I remember running from bullies and ultimately having to climb a tree to keep from them ... I was followed right to the top of the tree with them trying to make me take a fall that would kill me. (as high as your average house if not higher)

one or two followed me up (hard to remember I was fighting for my life) grabbing and trying to hit and pull at me two more on the ground throwing stones.

it was only after a long time and I had started trying to kick them off and trying to kick them in the face that they left.

my point is how far did the bullies go exactly? dont go thinking that just because theyre kids they wouldnt have been evil.
 

knhirt

New member
Nov 9, 2009
399
0
0
FarleShadow said:
knhirt said:
What a joke. Should the kid have brought just his fists instead? That's gonna work. Most likely, without the aid of that knife, the kid would have been beaten up and then the bullying would have continued.

Deciding to carry a method of protection is not the same as making a calculated decision to murder somebody.
Think, for a moment. If you were forced into a physical confrontation with a group of people, would you not take something along with you if you could?

Death is not such a terrible thing. Some people deserve to die. That's my opinion, and I'm sticking with it.
So escalation in the weaponry is the only answer? Knife doesn't work? Bring a gun?

And then, 'Some people deserve to die. That's my opinion'.

Christ! Are you some psychopath? How can you possible justify murder as a reasonable response?!
It's all the same. Knife, gun, you take the most effective thing you have access to in order to protect yourself. That's pretty basic. What's the difference between being dead because of a blade and being dead because of a bullet?
Also, I'm not talking about murder, here. If you can't make the distinction between straight-out murder and killing in self-defense, then I wonder who you're calling a psychopath.
People like that bully have it coming and I have absolutely no sympathy for them.