I would LOVE for Democrats to be even just half as cool as Republicans think Democrats are...damn, I wish
no seriously, this is utterly ludicrous
I would LOVE for Democrats to be even just half as cool as Republicans think Democrats are...damn, I wish
no seriously, this is utterly ludicrous
Which is exactly why we have direct democracy and the workers own the means of production. Jesus wept manBut the power, and the danger, is from the left. They control our schools, our media and largely, our government and deep state. They really are in a position to cause harm.
I guess if you don't consider Democrats the left, you have a point. But do a search on things such as who teachers politically support, and it is the Democratic party.damn, I wish
no seriously, this is utterly ludicrous
Every time a US soldier has raped a civilian, those in his command are responsible to respond accordingly (prison, court martial). What happens if they shrug and say, "that's fine"?No, we have literally no idea what's true. Bolton says he didn't hear Trump say it in a particular situation, but quite explicitly leaves open the possibility that he did say it at some other point.
And I did get my reports mixed up. Trump is reputed to said to John Kelly that he didn't understand why people served in war because he didn't understand why it was in their benefit to. And then there's calling John McCain a loser for being captured (thus implicitly all other POWs). And apparently his classmates back from his days in academy said he regularly disrespected the US military back then. And, you know, other stuff.
There is a lot of smoke. I think it's a bit unsafe to just dismiss there being a fire.
So you'd argue that every time a US soldier has raped a civilian, the president at the time (as commander in chief of the armed forces) is personally liable?
I do not see what is worse about describing an immigrant detention centre as a "concentration camp" than rousing a bunch of protestors with fighting talk and then directing them to march on the target of their ire.
I don't doubt it is "protected speech". But there's a big difference between whether you can say something and whether you should: "protected" does not mean "appropriate" or "responsible". Severe irresponsibility is a very disturbing trait for a president to have.
And this translates to you into mass indoctrination and censorship?I guess if you don't consider Democrats the left, you have a point. But do a search on things such as who teachers politically support, and it is the Democratic party.
It is a problem. Example: the recent critical race theory or whatever term you want to call lying to children about US history and making white people out to be the biggest problem in society.And this translates to you into mass indoctrination and censorship?
Teachers probably support the Democrats because the Republicans have a hate-boner for properly funding schools.
Refering to it as "critical race theory or whatever" undoubtedly shows you know what you're talking about.It is a problem. Example: the recent critical race theory or whatever term you want to call lying to children about US history and making white people out to be the biggest problem in society.
"I want a place to live."
is a problem. Example: the recent critical race theory or whatever term you want to call lying to children about US history and making white people out to be the biggest problem in society.
And are the schools underfunded? "$13,187 per pupil during the 2019 fiscal year " https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2021/public-school-spending-per-pupil.html
That's a ton of money for a classroom with 30 kids (about the average class size when I was a kid). About $400K per room. And the teacher isn't getting half that money.
Yes, they are bound to appropriate action, involving investigation, and potentially prosecution. Pelosi has set up an investigation to see what happened on 6th January, including potential security failures. So this seems to me like an appropriate response.Every time a US soldier has raped a civilian, those in his command are responsible to respond accordingly (prison, court martial). What happens if they shrug and say, "that's fine"?
It is at worse an exaggeration. Concentration camps were of course invented by the UK and also have been practised by the USA, for all that they are most famously associated with Nazi Germany. And even still, there is just no reasonable way to equate it with a call to action such as:And any location with a concentration of people could be referred to as a "concentration camp" which would be non-judgemental. Kinda of like calling a teacher a child molester because they bother children. Bad use of the term. But AOC was actually likening it to a Nazi death camp. Suggesting to the suggestible that these were dens of violence and injustice. It is no wonder that some took that to be a call to action/violence.
This just goes to show how little you know about it. CRT is not that recent. It originated in the 70's and it is very well founded. The only recent thing about it is the fact that it is the latest boogyman that the right-wing media uses to scare its ignorant base with. Every couple of years they'll come up with something new to upset you. And lo and behold, you fell for another piece of their propaganda. Right on cue, as so many other right-wingers without critical thinking skills. It might have something to do with the fact that right-wing in the US is literally against critical thinking being taught: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...skills-really/2012/07/08/gJQAHNpFXW_blog.htmlIt is a problem. Example: the recent critical race theory or whatever term you want to call lying to children about US history and making white people out to be the biggest problem in society.
That's just nonsense. Globally the left is the weakest its ever been and in the US the left isn't even a factor anymore.And they're wrong too. But the power, and the danger, is from the left. They control our schools, our media and largely, our government and deep state. They really are in a position to cause harm.
So far it seems to be a ''he said, she said'' situation but I can easily believe Trump said those things. After all he's obviously hostile to the post war world order which gives him a motive to scoff at the people who died to create it. Trump also has made a habit of mocking soldiers for their misery and as a coward who dodged the draft he has reasons to consider himself ''clever'' and those that failed to dodge conscription as ''suckers''.I've heard a ton of things about what Trump has said and done, ie, calling our troops suckers, that end up being non-sense.
Literally no public school is teaching that, so it's okay.Example: the recent critical race theory or whatever term you want to call lying to children about US history and making white people out to be the biggest problem in society.
I guess if you don't consider Democrats the left, you have a point. But do a search on things such as who teachers politically support, and it is the Democratic party.
To an extent it doesn't matter if the Republican Party official membership withers away to nothingness, so long as business keeps funding it up the wazoo and enough of those ex-members keep voting for it. I mean, membership down 140,000 in the context of 75 million voting for it. :/![]()
Nearly 140,000 voters left GOP in 25 states in January
Nearly 140,000 voters left the Republican Party in 25 states in January, according to an analysis of public voting records obtained by The Hill. Some of the steepest drops in Republican Party …thehill.com
Well also consider that, I think on average, the republican party tends to age more into the older demographics. So given the annual death rate for their target base, coupling that with a number of people unregistering (and assuming that's an annual rate, not just a single incident), that could add up to some significant reductions in their voting base, going forward. And while yes, unlisting yourself from the party, doesn't automatically mean you won't keep voting for them, odds are pretty good if you went to the trouble to actually do that, you don't plan on voting along that party line.To an extent it doesn't matter if the Republican Party official membership withers away to nothingness, so long as business keeps funding it up the wazoo and enough of those ex-members keep voting for it. I mean, membership down 140,000 in the context of 75 million voting for it. :/
Except, arguably of course, the Party will increasingly be run by extremists who will find it much easier to dominate candidate selection. This might take a toll after a while. But then, it might also be that a load of those ex-members who now identify as Independent but carry on voting Republican are just as extreme, too.
Note also the sudden 180 on vaccines from most Republican leadership now that the Delta variant is tearing ass through the red states. The Repubs resort to dirty tricks because demographically they're having a harder time competing every year.Well also consider that, I think on average, the republican party tends to age more into the older demographics. So given the annual death rate for their target base, coupling that with a number of people unregistering (and assuming that's an annual rate, not just a single incident), that could add up to some significant reductions in their voting base, going forward. And while yes, unlisting yourself from the party, doesn't automatically mean you won't keep voting for them, odds are pretty good if you went to the trouble to actually do that, you don't plan on voting along that party line.