Crono1973 said:
Radoh said:
Crono1973 said:
I read all that and I ignored it, here's why:
I am claiming they had a poor launch
You are saying that a poor launch doesn't matter. Well, it sounds like you are agreeing that they had a poor launch but don't think it matters. Why would I argue with you about that?
You may as well be saying that Pepsi has fewer calories than Coke because that too has nothing to do with what I am talking about.
Funny that you ignore everything else you've been arguing in this thread and are now addressing this as though it's what you've been arguing the whole time. You see, even though you seem determined to ignore that you've done nothing but argue how poorly Nintendo has been doing and have had to eat those words, you still pretend like all you've been arguing is that it had a poor launch, which just is not true.
And no, no amount of editing your posts will change that. You were wrong about every one of your points in the last two pages whenever you tried arguing something new.
Whenever sufficient evidence got into your head to deny your claim, you abandon it as though it was not your own.
That's very dishonest of you.
Oh ok then, remind me, where have I claimed anything other than the WiiU and the 3DS had a poor launch?
In the OP, you argue that previous generation consoles are outselling the WiiU, same thing with post 6 and 10. (Special mention that the 3DS made no appearances thus far, meaning that you haven't been arguing shit about it until more recently.)
Post 12 you argue whether or not Nintendo is happy with it's sales and the legitimacy of the article. Unrelated to the OP.
Post 15 you argue that all consoles are dying and Nintendo is first, because why not.
Post 17 you call anyone arguing against you apologists and make yourself out to be a victim.
Post 20 you make fun of the WiiU and Wii's controller, trying to deflect the conversation to that instead.
Post 42 you argue the WiiU is a dumb name and looks too similar to the Wii, again not the original topic of the thread.
Post 49 you argue semantics about the audience size in 2000.
Post 51 you deflect more questions and claim that you've not had anything to do with saying the WiiU is doing poorly despite the really obvious fact that you've done nothing but argue against anyone who points out that it won't be a failure.
Post 53 is the same thing.
Post 57 basically proves the point you deflect in 51.
Post 59 is back in line with what you are saying was your argument the whole time, I will give you that.
Post 61 you're arguing that you like Nintendo to be struggling, I think. Not really sure why that would be the case considering it kind of disregards your own OP and your general tone throughout the whole thread.
Post 72 you post your Michael Pachter argument saying that the WiiU will have a price drop and that that is completely disastrous and again has nothing to do with a poor launch. (Also, FINALLY mention the 3DS here, seems kind of far in considering you hold it as an integral part of the thread.)
Post 76 you do talk a good amount about the poor launch of the 3DS and argue about the price drop and postulate that it is a sign of failure.
Post 78 you deflect a valid point about the PS3's poor launch and say that has nothing to do with the 3DS's poor launch. Also you argue why Pachter is a perfectly valid source of information because he gets paid to do it, which I just find absolutely hilarious.
Post 80 you ask what records are being broken by Nintendo's launches, which has nothing to do with the poor launches, pointing out that you are IN FACT talking about things other than the launch, which set off this massive post.
Then I joined the conversation which lead us here.
Don't ever try and pull the "What have I said?" card on someone who's spiteful and has some time to kill before bed.
