ItsAChiaotzu said:
I believe if there were no money in the industry the only games that would be made would be ones purely for the purpose of art.
a artistic game does not equal a good game, also I would hate movies if there was no money in them and they were only made for artistic purpose but you know what
EVEN ARTISTIC MOVIES NEED MONEY BEHIND THEM. At least a lot of the good ones, same with games even though there are a lot more good artistic games that cost close to nothing (compared to movies) to make but still the number 1 thing I wan't in my games is that they are
FUN.
ItsAChiaotzu said:
if all art was made out of the desire to make art then we would have (mostly) consistently high products and piracy wouldn't be an issue.
Bull carp for several reasons:
1.) just because someone doesn't have any money to make a game doesn't mean that the game will be good to show this just randomly browse newgrounds for about a day. finished? ok all those games were made with a production cost of 0 and most of them SUCK.
2.) just because someone isn't looking to make money doesn't mean they will make art. You want an example you an just to what you did before or minecraft originally made as a small project with little money to no money behind it and is it art NO is it good YES.
3.) I have seen thousands of movies that were just made to be art and they are 99.9% of the time s***the other 0.1% are so bad they are good.
4.) this doesn't solve piracy it just makes it pointless if all games are free.