A zombie or a murderer?

[MelasZepheos_v1legacy]

I'm going to go with the trend. I have lots of heavy bludgeoning objects around my room, including but not limited to multiple books, computing equipment and guitaring things. A zombie would be infinitely easier to deal with.

 

[CloakedOne]

death to the murderer

 

[Ekonk]

The zombie. Slow, stupid, easy to lock out and relatively easy to kill.

Also, the person killed would have to be killed too, because he or she would rise as well.

 

[Baldry]

Just for the hell of it option 1, just for the thrill(secretly wanting 2)

 

[orc33]

option 2 = the zombie apocalypse has started
*initiating zombie apocalypse countermeasure procedures*
just for the hell of finally getting this plan of the ground

 

[Voodoomancer]

I'll take both, then I'll trick them into killing each other.

 

[Kazturkey]

If the Zombie scratches me I will die of zombiefication. The murderer actually needs to kill me properly. Thus, I would rather fight a murderer, especially since when he comes up the stairs I'll pop out from under the conveniently covered eaves with a large metal rod that I have in my room and bash his head in.

 

[Enzeru92]

I would chose the zombie anyday and i would beat its head in with my wooden sword

 

[E-mantheseeker]

Id kill the OP removing either threat.

Ooh,it hurts me to know you would do that. However in the realm of my thread, I am immortal. I'll forgive you this time

 

[Xvito]

Well, the strength of Zombies lie in their numbers. So, just dealing with one shouldn't be any trouble... As long as you've got "The Guide" and some anti-zombie equipment lying around...

Incidentally, the strength of murderers also seem to lie in their numbers... So... Whatever works for you...

 

[digipinky75910]

I'd have to go zombie. Lots of stigma around killing murders, paperwork, it goes on your record, but with zombies, all ya gotta do is point and say, is a zombie!

I doubt they'd believe it was a zombie...

OT:

zombie

They would if I showed them the dismembered corpse

 

[annoyinglizardvoice]

Note: The only supplies/weapons you have are what you currently have in your house in real life

You've made surviving this far too easy
Depends on the sort of zombie. If it's both fast and contageous, then I'm sure the combination of home-turf advantage, bigger weapons, melee training and armour (raised by reenacters) will keep me alive against the psyco where-as I'd risk infection by the zombie even if I took it down.

 

[TheLefty]

The zombie coming at me probably means there's a zombie apocalyps going on, which means that even if I can get rid of it there will be a lot more to eventually eat me, so in that case I might as well give up and just let that first zombie eat me. It's not like I care that much for being alive.

Good point. That made me change my idea. I'd go with zombie just because it's easier but there would be more than one...But the murder can think and plan but there's only one.

 

[Jark212]

Option 2, Zombies can't plan, hide, or fight dirty, they just scratch and bite.

They can't run ether, anyone who says otherwise lies...

Anyways I'd take the zombies, There more fun...

Edit: Actually I'd let the zombie go and wait for a class 3 outbreak, then it will be my time to shine...

 

[Rooster893]

As in the Max Brooks novel, The Zombie Survival Guide,


"It would be easier to take on Ten zombies, rather than one criminal."

NEVER ARGUE WITH THE MANUAL!

 

[King of the N00bs]

opt 2 cause im smarter than a zombie

 

[loppopoo]

Murderer. Zombies have pain tolerance, humans'll get in capacitated usually with a baseball bat to the knees, shot to the chest, etc.

 

[Gmano]

I have so many spears and stuff in my house,and a great view of all the entrances. So either one doesn't stand a chance (provided the murderer ONLY has the knife, and not a gun or something, but even then, i know the layout of my house. I could still take 'em.

 

[Sanguinius- The Angel]

Either. I'd just take the metal baseball bat in my room and brain 'em.