That's her consideration to make, not his.Mortai Gravesend said:Well no, by competing without any consideration for others you're a worse person for it.
But she is a prize. There is really no way around that fact. You might not like to look at it that way, but why do you think the expression "Winning her heart" (or "Conquer her heart") were invented in the first place?Also looking at it as a competition which implies she's a prize to be won is pretty disgusting.
All life is competition, and looking at it differently is naive. To get a job you have to compete with others applying for the same post. Is this wrong? No, because being the best man for the job means you bring the most benefit to the employer. Competition doesn't mean you have to be a dick about it, you don't go and cripple the other applicants so they can't show up for an interview, no you just display superior ability for the job.Mortai Gravesend said:Well no, by competing without any consideration for others you're a worse person for it. Also looking at it as a competition which implies she's a prize to be won is pretty disgusting.VladG said:Well, if you don't know the guy, I say fuck him and go for it. Seriously, it's a competitive world, and courting is just another form of competition. The best man wins (more or less)
That doesn't mean her cheating on the guy. No, that's shitty. Legitimate break-up because you actually do like someone else more is ok.
As a general point, people follow that rule when it's convenient for them to. Don't argue me on that, it won't do you any good.senordesol said:Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Would you be ok with your girlfriend hooking up with some guy you didn't know?
Whatever your answer, that is your answer.
You do have a narrow-minded view. Why do you confuse "prize" with "object"? And yes, of course it goes both ways, it's a matter of perspective. Consider her/his affection your prize for being worthy for said affection.Mortai Gravesend said:It is his too. He knows what she is doing and what his participation is doing.Athinira said:That's her consideration to make, not his.Mortai Gravesend said:Well no, by competing without any consideration for others you're a worse person for it.
Because of a certain view of things. Views don't make it so.But she is a prize. There is really no way around that fact. You might not like to look at it that way, but why do you think the expression "Winning her heart" (or "Conquer her heart") were invented in the first place?Also looking at it as a competition which implies she's a prize to be won is pretty disgusting.
Erm, no, people aren't prizes. It would be silly as then what, you're both prizes? It's a mutual agreement.Whether or not you look at a person as a prize is irrelevant (because it IS a prize). How you CARE about your prize is relevant. Is it the most important prize you've ever won in your entire life, a prize that you will care for a polish every day? Or is it just another trophy to be put on the shelf while you go out and try to get a new one (because you like bragging about how many prizes you won or like "bagging trophies" or whatever)? THAT is what's important.
And if "Infidelity" is the problem, it's still her job to turn him down. Period.Mortai Gravesend said:It is his too. He knows what she is doing and what his participation is doing.
Mortai Gravesend said:Because of a certain view of things. Views don't make it so.
I'm just going to point to VladG's post after my first one. It explains pretty accurately why you're wrong.Mortai Gravesend said:Erm, no, people aren't prizes. It would be silly as then what, you're both prizes? It's a mutual agreement.
I've said in my OP that cheating is a shitty thing to do, and he should go for it if she breaks up with the other guy. That's not a lack of consideration. So either you didn't bother to read my post (funny that) or you just try to make me look like an asshole so you'd have a point to make. Also note that I don't care if I'm considered an asshole for my views. I stick by themMortai Gravesend said:And to take me pointing out that a lack of consideration for others isn't nice as saying there was no competition is idiotic. Also, life itself is not a competition. There are many in it, but no it itself is not a competition. It's not naive to not try to be all edgy or whatever.VladG said:All life is competition, and looking at it differently is naive.Mortai Gravesend said:Well no, by competing without any consideration for others you're a worse person for it. Also looking at it as a competition which implies she's a prize to be won is pretty disgusting.VladG said:Well, if you don't know the guy, I say fuck him and go for it. Seriously, it's a competitive world, and courting is just another form of competition. The best man wins (more or less)
That doesn't mean her cheating on the guy. No, that's shitty. Legitimate break-up because you actually do like someone else more is ok.
Oh my because I said competition didn't exist!To get a job you have to compete with others applying for the same post.
Because I totally said competition itself was wrong. Or wait, I didn't.Is this wrong?
Lolno. It isn't wrong in the case of a job, but hardly because of how it is for the employer.No, because being the best man for the job means you bring the most benefit to the employer.
Sleeping with someone who is in a relationship is being a dick.Competition doesn't mean you have to be a dick about it, you don't go and cripple the other applicants so they can't show up for an interview, no you just display superior ability for the job.
Can you read? If I remind you that I said "lack of consideration" will you be able to read those words or will you make more idiotic mistakes like trying to pretend that I said competition made you a worse person?A worse person for it? Really?? Competition is the BASIS of all evolution, of all growth.
Also, evolution has nothing to do with this at all.
It's not narrow minded of me to point out that one competes to win something.Prize to be won? No, and that's a very narrow-minded view. In every relationship you've won over someone else simply because you are a better partner to your girlfriend/boyfriend. Making someone happier than they would be with someone other than you is objectifying? Is that really how you think?
Also it's naive of you to always pretend that whoever wins in the end was better. Lett's all live in a nice little world where only the best in fact win.
Making someone happier? As if that was the stated goal. As if that is something you can know or even come close to judging without bias given the situation.
Pretty much exactly this. It's their responsibility to handle it. It's not something you need to worry about.evilthecat said:My theory has always been that people are responsible for their own partners. If you have a boyfriend or girlfriend, it's your choice whether you want to sleep with someone else. The person you're jumping into bed with with has no responsibility to look after your relationship for you. Your friends can always give you advice, and it's good to appreciate honest advice from your friends because it beats being lied to, but ultimately.. it's your decision. If you're okay with cheating, then fine, but it's your responsibility to handle it and any potential consequences.
Of course, I also think anyone is perfectly within their rights to account for whether someone is willing to lie to people they supposedly care about in an appraisal of their character. That doesn't necessarily mean you have to cut them off or even that you can't sleep with them, but if someone is willing to cheat on a partner, even to your advantage, I think that can tell you a lot about them.
I personally wouldn't ever go there again unless the person in question is incredibly hot or something about the situation is sufficiently interesting. My experience is that sleeping with people you can't respect seldom makes you feel very good about yourself, even putting aside any potential issues of guilt or exploitation.
It's not about what you can get away with, it's quite possibly more fun if you do get caught, it's about what you want to do. Don't you agree? Life is about wanting to do something and then doing it, if you want to put compassion for someone you've never met then you do that; if you want to have sex with some hot girl then you do that. Or is it all about doing what's right over what you actually want?peruvianskys said:if you know that your actions are going to hurt someone, propagate deceit and dishonesty, and probably most important indulge what is a clearly an uncontrolled mind and its desires, then you don't fucking do it. Stop trying to decide what you can and can't get away with and try and do what's right.
Tell me, what would happen if you were to fuck someone that had made such a promise?You don't fuck someone if they have made a promise to someone else that they won't.
Mortai Gravesend said:VladG said:Self-serving? Yes. Always. We all are.Mortai Gravesend said:Yes, and you're just being self-serving pretending to be some kind of hero. Now that we have unsubstantiated claims out of the way...Athinira said:snip
If someone chooses to be with you that isn't a prize.
Some kind of hero? no idea what this is about. What claim?